Skip to main content
Log in

Solute Segregation During Ferrite Growth: Solute/Interphase and Substitutional/Interstitial Interactions

  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The segregation of solutes to austenite/ferrite transformation interfaces during decarburization/denitriding of Fe-Mn-C, Fe-Mn-N, and Fe-Si-C ternary alloys was studied by using atom probe tomography. Manganese was found to segregate noticeably to the transformation interface in the presence of carbon, while no segregation could be detected in the presence of nitrogen. This result might indicate that manganese interacts little with the interface itself and that its interaction with the interstitial controls its segregation behavior. In the case of Fe-Si-C, the experiments were complicated by interface motion during quenching. Preliminary results suggest that silicon was depleted at the interface in contrast to the commonly observed segregation behavior of silicon at grain boundaries of ferrite and austenite. This observation could be explained by taking into account the repulsive interaction between silicon and carbon along with the intense segregation of carbon to the interface. This would lead to a net repulsive interaction of silicon with the interface even when considering the intrinsic tendency of silicon to segregate to the boundary in the absence of carbon. The results presented here emphasize the need to account for the interaction of all solutes present at the interface in ferrite growth models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We have used the convention in which an attractive interaction with the interface is indicated by a negative binding energy.

References

  1. M. Hillert and B. Sundman, Acta Metall. 24, 731 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J.W. Cahn, Acta Metall. 10, 789 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Enomoto, C.L. White, and H.I. Aaronson, Metall. Trans. A 19, 1807 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Qiu, H.S. Zurob, and C.R. Hutchinson, Acta Mater. 100, 333 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Mori, 19th Committee on Reaction in Steel Making (Department of Metallurgy, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, 1964)

  6. T. Wada, H. Wada, J.F. Elliott, and J. Chipman, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2, 2199 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Jarl, Scand. J. Metall. 7, 93 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Gavriljuk and H. Berns, High Nitrogen Steels: Structure, Properties, Manufacture, Applications (Berlin: Springer, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Guo, D. Panahi, H. Van Landeghem, C.R. Hutchinson, G. Purdy, and H.S. Zurob, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 46, 2449 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H.S. Zurob, C.R. Hutchinson, A. Béché, G.R. Purdy, and Y.J.M. Bréchet, Acta Mater. 56, 2203 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Gault, M.P. Moody, J.M. Cairney, and S.P. Ringer, Atom Probe Microscopy (New York: Springer, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.P. Van Landeghem, B. Langelier, D. Panahi, G.R. Purdy, and H.S. Zurob, International Conference on Solid-Solid Phase Transformations in Inorganic Materials (Whistler, BC, Canada, 2015), pp. 655–662.

  13. H. Guo and G.R. Purdy, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 39, 950 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. E.S. Humphreys, H.A. Fletcher, J.D. Hutchins, A.J. Garratt-Reed, W.T. Reynolds Jr., H.I. Aaronson, G.R. Purdy, and G.D.W. Smith, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 35, 1223 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Guo, G.R. Purdy, M. Enomoto, and H.I. Aaronson, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 37, 1721 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Wang, P.J. van der Wolk, and S. van der Zwaag, Mater. Trans. JIM 41, 761 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Gouné, F. Danoix, J. Ågren, Y. Bréchet, C.R. Hutchinson, M. Militzer, G. Purdy, S. van der Zwaag, and H. Zurob, Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 92, 1 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Toji, H. Matsuda, M. Herbig, P.-P. Choi, and D. Raabe, Acta Mater. 65, 215 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Lejček and S. Hofmann, Interface Sci. 1, 163 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Hofmann and P. Lejček, Interface Sci. 3, 241 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

DP, GAB, HSZ, and GRP gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The microscopy work was carried out at the Canadian Centre for Electron Microscopy, a facility supported by the Canada Foundation for Innovation under the MSI program, NSERC and McMaster University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. P. Van Landeghem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Landeghem, H.P., Langelier, B., Panahi, D. et al. Solute Segregation During Ferrite Growth: Solute/Interphase and Substitutional/Interstitial Interactions. JOM 68, 1329–1334 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-1852-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-1852-y

Keywords

Navigation