Review of Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V Made by Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing Using Powder Feedstock
Laser-based additive manufacturing (AM) of metals using powder feedstock can be accomplished via two broadly defined technologies: directed energy deposition (DED) and powder bed fusion (PBF). In these processes, metallic powder is delivered to a location and locally melted with a laser heat source. Upon deposition, the material undergoes a rapid cooling and solidification, and as subsequent layers are added to the component, the material within the component is subjected to rapid thermal cycles. In order to adopt AM for the building of structural components, a thorough understanding of the relationships among the complex thermal cycles seen in AM, the unique heterogeneous and anisotropic microstructure, and the mechanical properties must be developed. Researchers have fabricated components by both DED and PBF from the widely used titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V and studied the resultant microstructure and mechanical properties. This review article discusses the progress to date on investigating the as-deposited and heat-treated microstructures and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V structures made by powder-based laser AM using DED and PBF.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Science Foundation through Award Number CMMI-1402978. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
- 1.G. Lutjering and J.C. Williams, Titanium, 2nd ed. (Berlin: Springer, 2007).Google Scholar
- 2.M.J. Donachie, Titanium: A Technical Guide, 2nd ed. (Materials Park: ASM International, 2000).Google Scholar
- 3.ASTM F2921-11, Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing—Coordinate Systems and Test (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2011).Google Scholar
- 6.M.L. Griffith, D.M. Keicher, C.L. Atwood, J.A. Romero, J.E. Smugeresky, L.D. Harwell, and D. L. Greene, Proceedings of 7th Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium (Austin, August 12–14, 1996), p. 53.Google Scholar
- 7.D.M. Keicher and W.D. Miller, Met. Powder Rep. 53, 26 (1998).Google Scholar
- 9.W. Carter and M. Jones, Proceedings of Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium (1993), p. 51.Google Scholar
- 14.P.A. Kobryn and S.L. Semiatin, Proceedings of 12th Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium (Austin, 2001), p. 179.Google Scholar
- 35.M. Simonelli, Y.Y. Tse, and C. Tuck, J. Phys. 371, 1 (2012).Google Scholar
- 41.E. Amsterdam and G. Kool, 25th ICAF (International Committee on Aeronautical Fatigue) Symposium (Rotterdam, May 27–29, 2009), pp. 1261–1274.Google Scholar
- 42.X.D. Zhang, H. Zhang, R.J. Grylls, T.J. Lienert, C. Brice, H.L. Fraser, D.M. Keicher, and M.E. Schlienger, J. Adv. Mater. 33, 17 (2001).Google Scholar
- 49.M.K.E. Ramosoeu, G. Booysen, T.N. Ngonda, and H.K. Chikwanda, Mater. Sci. Technol. 2, 1460 (2011).Google Scholar
- 55.D.N. Mohamed, T. Robert, and B. Thorsten, 1019, 248 (2014).Google Scholar
- 58.http://www.optomec.com/3d-Printed-Metals/lens-Materials/ (2015). Accessed 15 Nov 2015.
- 59.M.K.E. Ramosoeu, G. Booysen, T.N. Ngonda, and C. Bloemfontein, Materials Science and Technology Conference (Columbus, October 16–20, 2011).Google Scholar
- 60.EOS, Material Data Sheet EOS Titanium Ti64 (2011).Google Scholar
- 61.M.L. Griffith, M.T. Ensz, J.D. Puskar, C.V. Robino, J.A. Brooks, J.A. Philliber, J.E. Smugeresky, and W.H. Hofmeister, MRS Proceeding 625 (2000).Google Scholar