Skip to main content
Log in

An Improved Process for Precipitating Cyanide Ions from the Barren Solution at Different pHs

  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent decades, the use of metal sulfides instead of hydroxide precipitation in hydrometallurgical processes has gained prominence. Some arguments for its preferential use are as follows: a high degree of metal removal at relatively low pH values, the sparingly soluble nature of sulfide precipitates, favorable dewatering characteristics, and the stability of the formed metal sulfides. The Merrill–Crowe zinc-precipitation process has been applied worldwide in a large number of operations for the recovery of gold and silver from cyanide solutions. However, in some larger plants, the quality of this precious precipitate is low because copper, zinc and especially lead are precipitated along with gold and silver. This results in higher consumption of zinc dust and flux during the smelting of the precipitate, the formation of the matte, and a shorter crucible life. The results show that pH has a significant effect on the removal efficiency of zinc and copper cyanide ions. The optimal pH range was determined to be 3–4, and the removal efficiency of zinc and copper cyanide ions was up to 99%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.R. Parga, J.L. Valenzuela, and F. Cepeda, JOM 10, 43 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. I. Rehman and W. Bonfield, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 8, 1 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Rayanaud, E. Champion, D. Bernache-Assollant, and P. Thomas, Mater. Chem. Phys. 23, 1065 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Lin, R.C. Viadero, B.E. Reed, and R.L. Vaughan, Water Environ. Res. 71, 816 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R.W.Peters, Y. Ku, and. D. Bhattacharyya, in AIChE Symp. Series, vol. 81 (1985) pp. 165–172.

  6. I.A.Sultan, Environ. Tech., (1998) pp. 56–60

  7. F. Fenglian and Q. Wang, J. Environ. Manag. 92, 407 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Freedman and Shannon, in Industrial Water Enginnering (1973) pp. 31.

  9. A. Özverdi and M.J. Erdem, Hazard. Mater. 137, 626 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A.E. Lewis, Hydrometallurgy 104, 222 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H.M. Freeman, Standard Handbook of Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1989), p. 7.21.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K.A. Baltpurvins, R.C. Burns, G.A. Lawrance, and A.D. Stuart, Effect of electrolyte composition on zinc hydroxide precipitation by lime. Water Res. 31, 973–980 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT), the Department of Chemical Engineering and Metallurgical at the University of Sonora, and TNM (ITS) in Mexico.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriela V. Figueroa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Figueroa, G.V., Parga, J.R., Valenzuela, J.L. et al. An Improved Process for Precipitating Cyanide Ions from the Barren Solution at Different pHs. JOM 68, 540–547 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1746-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1746-4

Keywords

Navigation