Abstract
The magnetic domain structure of commercial alnico grades 5–7 and 9 was investigated using a magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) to gain an understanding of their coercivity mechanisms at the micron to millimeter scale. In alnico 5–7, the magnetic domain structure exhibits stripes of alternating high and low induction. Magnetic domains easily cross grain boundaries if neighboring grains have a similar tilt and rotation of their crystallographic axes relative to the magnet body. In contrast for alnico 9, stripe-like magnetic domains are not observed regularly throughout the transverse section; rather, discrete localization of high- and low-induction stripe features are observed. In higher magnification MOKE experiments, i.e., ~100 μm, a zigzag-shaped magnetic domain structure was observed in both alnico 5–7 and 9. The zigzag features are four to five times smaller in size than an average grain of alnico 5–7, implying a pinning mechanism that is caused by structural elements within the grains. Discontinuous and reversible motion on a length scale of a few microns was observed for the zigzag-shaped domains for incremental changes in the applied field of ~10 Oe. Complimentary magnetic force microscopy measurements show that there are domain structures on an even smaller scale, i.e., 2 μm to 100 μm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B.D. Cullity and C.D. Graham, Introduction to Magnetic Materials, 2nd ed. (New York: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2008).
Critical Materials Strategy, U.S. DOE, 2011, http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/DOE_CMS2011_FINAL_Full.pdf.
Critical Materials for Sustainable Energy Applications, R. Institute, 2011, http://www.resnick.caltech.edu/news/Features/ri_criticalmaterials_report.pdf.
M.J. Kramer, R.W. McCallum, I.A. Anderson, and S. Constantinides, JOM 64, 752 (2012).
L.H. Lewis and F. Jimenez-Villacorta, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 44A, 2 (2013).
V.A.M. Brabers, Handbook of Magnetic Materials, vol. 8, ed. K.H. Buschow (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1995), p. 189.
R.B. Campbell and C.A. Julien, J. Appl. Phys. 32, S346 (1961).
A.F. Andresen, W. Halg, P. Fischer, and E. Stoll, Acta Chem. Scand. 21, 1543 (1967).
J.M.D. Coey and P.A.I. Smith, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200, 405 (1999).
R.B. Campbell and C.A. Julien, J. Appl. Phys. 32, S192 (1961).
J.J. Mason, D.W. Ashall, and A.V. Dean, IEEE Trans. Magn. Mag. 6, 191 (1970).
E.A. Nesbitt and H.J. Williams, Phys. Rev. 80, 112 (1950).
C.A. Julien and F.G. Jones, J. Appl. Phys. 36, 1173 (1965).
A.H. Geisler, Trans. ASM 43, 70 (1951).
J.W. Cahn, Acta Metall. Mater. 9, 795 (1961).
J.W. Cahn, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 3581 (1963).
P. Pashkov, A. Fridman, E. Granovsky, V. Sergeyev, and R. Larichki, J. Appl. Phys. 40, 1308 (1969).
H.C. Angus, J.J. Mason, and S.W.K. Shaw, Metallurgia 82, 127 (1970).
S. Hao, K. Ishida, and T. Nishizawa, Metall. Trans. A 16, 179 (1985).
S.A. Cowley, M.G. Hetherington, J.P. Jakubovics, and G.D.W. Smith, J. Phys. Paris 47, 211 (1986).
M.G. Hetherington, A. Cerezo, J. Hyde, G.D.W. Smith, and G.M. Worrall, J. Phys. Paris 47, 495 (1986).
M.G. Hetherington, G.D.W. Smith, and J.P. Jakubovics, Metall. Trans. A 17, 1629 (1986).
M.G. Hetherington, A. Cerezo, J.P. Jakubovics, and G.D.W. Smith, J. Appl. Phys. 57, 4173 (1985).
M.G. Hetherington, A. Cerezo, J.P. Jakubovics, and G.D.W. Smith, J. Phys. Paris 45, 429 (1984).
J.J. Wyslocki and B. Wyslocki, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 83, 225 (1990).
R. Skomski, Y. Liu, J.E. Shield, G.C. Hadjipanayis, and D.J. Sellmyer, J. Appl. Phys. 107 09A739 (2010).
J.F. Herbst, Rev. Mod. Phys. 63, 819 (1991).
J.A. Krizan and S.D. Sudhoff, IEEE. (2012). doi:10.1109/PESGM.2012.6345224.
C. Kittel, E.A. Nesbitt, and W. Shockley, Phys. Rev. 77, 839 (1950).
J.J. Kim, H.S. Park, D. Shindo, S. Hirosawa, and H. Morimoto, Mater. Trans. 47, 907 (2006).
Q. Xing, M.K. Miller, L. Zhou, H.M. Dillon, R.W. McCallum, I.E. Anderson, S. Constantinides, and M.J. Kramer, IEEE Trans. Magn. In press.
L. Zhou and M.J. Kramer, in preparation.
Acknowledgements
We are greatly indebted to Fran Laabs (Ames Laboratory) for OIM data collection and assistance in data analysis. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), under its Vehicle Technologies Program, through the Ames Laboratory. The Ames Laboratory is operated by Iowa State University under Contract DE-AC02-07CH11358.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palasyuk, A., Blomberg, E., Prozorov, R. et al. Advances in Characterization of Non-Rare-Earth Permanent Magnets: Exploring Commercial Alnico Grades 5–7 and 9. JOM 65, 862–869 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0618-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0618-z