Dynamic fracture resilience of elk antler: Biomimetic inspiration for improved crashworthiness
- 202 Downloads
The antler of the North American elk has been shown to have impressive fracture resistance under quasi-static loads, but given its viscoelastic behavior and impact nature of loading, questions remain as to its mechanical, and in particular, fracture behavior under dynamic loading. Samples were tested using a unique split-pressure Hopkin-son bar (SPHB) for four-point bending experiments in order to measure the fracture toughness of this material Interestingly, the hierarchical structure of antler had a strong influence on crack propagation characteristics, and cracks tended to propagate along the osteonal growth direction, whether loaded parallel or perpendicular to the osteonal growth direction. This occurred to such a degree so as to stop all crack propagation through the sample on transverse specimens, thus inhibiting the ability to measure a valid crack initiation toughness and demonstrating the extreme resilience of antler to resist dynamic fracture. The high resilience of antler to impact loading may serve as biomimetic inspiration to future material development for crashworthiness and defense applications.
KeywordsFracture Toughness Crack Initiation Dynamic Fracture Viscoelastic Behavior Fracture Resistance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.P.Y. Chen, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceeding 1132E (Warrendale, FA: MRS, 2008), doi: 10.1557/PROC-1132-Z01 -04.Google Scholar
- 7.M.E. Launey et al., “Mechanistic Aspects of Fracture and R-curve Behavior in Elk Antler Bone” (submitted to Acta Biomaterialia, 2009).Google Scholar
- 9.J.G. Skedros, P. Durand, and R.D. Bloebaum, J. Bone and Mineral Research, 10(Suppl 1) (1995), p. S441.Google Scholar
- 13.ASTM, “Standard Test Methods for Determination of Fracture Toughness of Advanced Ceramics,” ASTM-C1421-01b, ASTM Annual Book of Standards (West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2006).Google Scholar
- 14.G.T. Gray, ASM HandbookVol 8, Mechanical Testing and Evaluation, ed. M. Kuhn and D. Medlin (Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 2000), pp. 462–476.Google Scholar
- 15.F. Jiang and K. Vecchio, Applied Mechanics Reviews, 62(6) (2009), doi: 10.1115/1.3124647.Google Scholar
- 20.A.C. Kitchener, Biomechanics and Evolutbn, ed. J.M.V. Rayner and R.J. Wootton (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 229–253.Google Scholar