JOM

, Volume 60, Issue 8, pp 39–46 | Cite as

Thermodynamic metrics for measuring the “sustainability” of design for recycling

Recycling and Clean Technologies Overview

Abstract

In this article, exergy is applied as a parameter to measure the “sustainability” of a recycling system in addition to the fundamental prediction of material recycling and energy recovery, summarizing a development of over 20 years by the principal author supported by various co-workers, Ph.D., and M.Sc. students. In order to achieve this, recyclate qualities and particle size distributions throughout the system must be predicted as a function of product design, liberation during shredding, process dynamics, physical separation physics, and metallurgical thermodynamics. This crucial development enables the estimation of the true exergy of a recycling system from its inputs and outputs including all its realistic industrial traits. These models have among others been linked to computer aided design tools of the automotive industry and have been used to evaluate the performance of waste electric and electronic equipment recycling systems in The Netherlands. This paper also suggests that the complete system must be optimized to find a “truer” optimum of the material production system linked to the consumer market.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M.A. Reuter et al., The Metrics of Material and Metal Ecology (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2005).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Szargut, Exergy Method—Technical and Ecological Applications, Vol. 18 of International series on Developments in Heat Transfer (Southampton, U.K.: WIT Press, 2005).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Meskers et al., “A Fundamental Metric for Metal Recycling Applied to Coated Magnesium,” Metallurgical Transactions B (in press).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. Ignatenko, A. van Schaik, and M.A. Reuter, “Exergy as a Tool for Evaluation of the Resource Efficiency of Recycling Systems,” Minerals Engineering, 20(9) (2007), pp. 862–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. van Schaik and M.A. Reuter, “The Time-Varying Factors Influencing the Recycling Rate of Products,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 40(4) (2004), pp. 301–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. van Schaik and M.A. Reuter, “The Use of Fuzzy Rule Models to Link Automotive Design to Recycling Rate Calculation,” Minerals Engineering, 20(9) (2007), pp. 875–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O. Ignatenko, A. van Schaik, and M.A. Reuter, “Recycling System Flexibility: The Fundamental Solution to Achieve High Recycling Rates,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(4) (2007), pp. 432–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.A. Reuter, A. van Schaik, and O. Ignatenko, “Fundamental Limits for the Recycling of End-of-Life Vehicles,” Minerals Engineering, 19(5) (2006), pp. 433–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.A. Reuter, “The Fundamental Limits of Recycling” (Doctorate of Engineering Thesis, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa, 2006).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ausmelt Ltd.MelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.MARASThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations