Skip to main content
Log in

Localized corrosion of alloy 22 in the potential Yucca Mountain repository environment

  • Nuclear Waste Disposition
  • Overview
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has indicated that it may use Alloy 22 as the waste package outer container material for the potential high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Additionally, a drip shield, made of titanium grade 7 and titanium grade 29, may extend the length of the emplacement drifts to enclose the top and sides of the emplaced waste package. Localized corrosion in the form of crevice corrosion could be one degradation process that may adversely affect the waste package performance. This paper will summarize the work conducted to evaluate the effects of environmental conditions relevant to the potential Yucca Mountain repository, metallurgical states (e.g., mill-annealed and welded plus solution annealed), and similar and dissimilar metal crevices on the crevice corrosion susceptibility of Alloy 22. This work also evaluates crevice corrosion propagation behavior resulting from contact with Alloy 22 or titanium grade 7.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Risk Insights Baseline Report, NUREG-1762 (Washington, D.C.: NRC, July 2004).

  2. G.A. Cragnolino et al., “Assessment of Performance Issues Related to Alternate Engineered Barrier System Materials and Design Options,” CNWRA 99-003 (San Antonio, TX: CNWRA, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Mohanty, T.J. McCartin, and D. Esh, corrdinators, “Total-system Performance Assessment (TPA), Version 4.0 Code: Module Descriptions and User’s Guide” (San Antonio, TX: CNWRA, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.S. Dunn et al., “Modeling Corrosion Processes for Alloy 22 Waste Packages,” Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIX Symposium Proceedings Vol. 932, ed. P. Van Isheghem (Warrendale, PA: Materials Research Society, 2006), pp. 853–860.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D.S. Dunn et al., “Localized Corrosion Susceptibility of Alloy 22 in Chloride Solutions: Part 2—Effect of Fabrication Processes,” Corrosion, 62 (2006), pp. 3–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. D.S. Dunn et al., “Passive and Localized Corrosion of Alloy 22—Modeling and Experiments,” CNWRA 2005-002 (San Antonio, TX: CNWRA, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.S. Dunn et al., “Localized Corrosion Susceptibility of Alloy 22 in Chloride Solutions: Part 1—Mill-Annealed Condition,” Corrosion, 61 (2005), pp. 1078–1085.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. X. He and D.S. Dunn, “Alloy 22 Localized Corrosion Propagation in Chloride-Containing Waters,” Corrosion, 63 (2007), pp. 145–158.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. X. He and D.S. Dunn, “Alloy 22 Localized Corrosion Propagation in Chloride-Containing Waters,” CNWRA 2006-001 (San Antonio, TX: CNWRA, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  10. “Metals Test Methods and Analytical Procedures,” ASTM G46-94 (2004): Standard Guide for Examination and Evaluation of Pitting Corrosion. Volume 3.02: Wear and Erosion—Metal Corrosion (West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2004), published on CD-ROM.

  11. D.S. Dunn et al., “The Effects of Fabrication Processes on the Mechanical Properties of Waste Packages—Progress Report,” CNWRA 2004-03 (San Antonio, TX: CNWRA, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D.S. Dunn, D. Daruwalla, and Y.-M. Pan, “Effect of Fabrication Processes on Material Stability—Characterization and Corrosion,” CNWRA 2004-01 (San Antonio, TX: CNWRA, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.L. Tapping, “Surface Studies of Austenitic Alloys Subjected to Crevice Corrosion in Sea Water,” Corrosion Science, 25 (1985), pp. 363–376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Y.H. Kim and G.S. Frankel, “Effect of Noblel Element Alloying on Passivity and Passivity Breakdown on Ni,” J. Electrochemical Society, 154 (2007), pp. C36–C42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J.R. Hayes et al., “Influence of Chromium and Molybdenum on the Corrosion of Nickel-Based Alloys,” Corrosion, 62 (2006), pp. 491–500.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. A.C. Lloyd et al., “Effects of Temperature and Potential on the Passive Corrosion Properties of Alloys C22 and C276,” J. Electrochemical Society, 150 (2003), pp. B120–B130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. A.C. Lloyd et al., “Cr, Mo and W Alloying Additions in Ni and Their Effect on Passivity,” Electrochimica Acta, 49 (2004), pp. 3015–3027.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. D.D. Macdonald, “The Point Defect Model for the Passive State,” J. Electrochemical Society, 139 (1992), pp. 3434–3448.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. B.A. Kehler, G.O. Ilevbare, and J.R. Scully, “Crevice Corrosion Stabilization and Repassivation Behavior of Alloy 625 and Alloy 22,” Corrosion, 57 (2001), pp. 1042–1065.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. N. Sridhar et al., “Stabilization and Repassivation of Localized Corrosion,” Proceedings of the CORROSION/2001 Research Topical Symposium, ed. G.S. Frankel and J.P. Scully (Houston, TX: NACE, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xihua He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, X., Mintz, T. Localized corrosion of alloy 22 in the potential Yucca Mountain repository environment. JOM 60, 44–51 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-008-0007-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-008-0007-1

Keywords

Navigation