Advertisement

JOM

, Volume 59, Issue 3, pp 61–65 | Cite as

Clay-epoxy nanocomposites: Processing and properties

  • Nikhil Gupta
  • Tien Chih Lin
  • Michael Shapiro
Research Summary Nanocomposite Materials

Abstract

The work described in this paper is focused on evaluating the effect of the processing method and nanoclay (montmorillonite) content on the tensile, compressive, and impact properties of clay-epoxy nanocomposites. Nanocomposites are synthesized by two methods: mechanical mixing and shear mixing. Both these methods are capable of producing bulk quantities of clay-epoxy nanocomposites. X-ray diffraction analysis indicates that the nanoclay has exfoliated in the mechanically mixed specimens. Results show that as nanoclay content increases the tensile modulus increases for both mechanically and shear mixed specimens, while the compressive modulus remains largely unchanged. The total energy absorption under impact loading is found to be higher in mechanically mixed specimens.

Keywords

Compressive Modulus Neat Epoxy Syntactic Foam Neat Resin Nanoclay Content 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Y. Kojima et al., “Synthesis and Mechanical Properties of Nylon-6/Clay Hybrid,” Journal of Materials Research, 8 (1993), pp. 1179–1185.ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Miyagawa and L.T. Drzal, “Thermo-physical and Impact Properties of Epoxy Nanocomposites Reinforced by Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes,” Polymer, 45(15) (2004), pp. 5163–5170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Mahajan et al., “Synthesis and Characterization of Nanosized Metal Embedded in Polystyrene Matrix,” Composites: Part B, 37 (2006), pp. 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F.H. Gojny et al., “Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Epoxy-Composites: Enhanced Stiffness and Fracture Toughness at Low Nanotube Content,” Composites Science and Technology, 64(15) (2004), pp. 2363–2371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K.T. Lau et al., “Heat Absorbability of Single-Walled, Coiled and Bamboo Nanotube/Epoxy Nanocomposites,” Journal of Material Science, 39 (2004), pp. 5861–5863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.H. Park and S.C. Jana, “The Relationship between Nano-and Microstructures and Mechanical Properties in PMMA-Epoxy-Nanoclay Composites,” Polymer, 44(7) (2003), pp. 2091–2100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.S. Ray and M. Okamoto, “Polymer/Layered Silicate Nanocomposites: A Review from Preparation to Processing,” Progress in Polymer Science, 28 (2003), pp. 1539–1641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Zhou et al., “Fabrication and Characterization of Montmorillonite Clay-filled SC-15 Epoxy,” Materials Letters, 60(7) (2006), pp. 869–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K.T. Lau, M. Lu, and D. Hui, “Coiled Carbon Nanotubes: Synthesis and Their Potential Application in Advanced Composite Structures,” Composites: Part B, 37(6) (2006), pp. 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.K. Subramaniyan and C.T. Sun, “Enhancing Compressive Strength of Unidirectional Polymeric Composites Using Nanoclay,” Composites: Part A, 37(12) (2006), pp. 2257–2268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Maharsia, N. Gupta, and H.D. Jerro, “Investigation of Flexural Strength Properties of Rubber and Nanoclay Reinforced Hybrid Syntactic Foams,” Materials Science and Engineering A, 417 (2006), pp. 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Andrew McWilliams, Nanocomposites, Nanoparticles, Nanoclays, and Nanotubes (Norwalk, CT: Business Communications Company, June 2006).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nanomaterials to 2008—Market Size, Market Share, Demand Forecast, and Sales (Cleveland, OH: Freedonia Group, January 2005).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Zhao et al., “Ultrasonic Oscillations Induced Morphology and Property Development of Polypropylene/Montmorillonite Nanocomposites,” Polymer, 47(7) (2006), pp. 2460–2469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    C.K. Lam et al., “Cluster Size Effect in Hardness of Nanoclay/Epoxy Composites,” Composites: Part B, 36 (2005), pp. 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    C.K. Lam et al., “Effect of Ultrasound Sonication in Nanoclay Clusters of Nanoclay/Epoxy Composites,” Materials Letters, 59 (2005), pp. 1369–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    ASTM Standard Test D 5083-02: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Reinforced Thermosetting Plastics Using Straight-Sided Specimens (West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, April 10, 2002).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ASTM Standard Test D 695-02: Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics (West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, August 10, 2002).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    ASTM Standard Test D 4812-05: Standard Test Method for Unnotched Cantilever Beam Impact Strength of Plastics (West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, November 11, 2005).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.J. Luo and I.M. Daniel, “Characterization and Modeling of Mechanical Behavior of Polymer/Clay Nanocomposites,” Composites Science and Technology, 63(11) (2003), pp. 1607–1616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Yasmin, J.L. Abot, and I.M. Daniel, “Processing of Clay/Epoxy Nanocomposites by Shear Mixing,” Scripta Materialia, 49(1) (2003), pp. 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A.K. Subramaniyan and C.T. Sun, “Toughening Polymeric Composites Using Nanoclay: Crack Tip Scale Effects on Fracture Toughness,” Composites: Part A, 38(1) (2007), pp. 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Lu et al., “Enhancement of Vicker’s Hardness of Nanoclay-Supported Nanotube Reinforced Novel Polymer Composites,” Carbon, 44 (2006), pp. 383–386.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Wang et al., “Preparation, Morphology and Thermal/Mechanical Properties of Epoxy/Nanoclay Composite,” Composites: Part A, 37(11) (2006), pp. 1890–1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    P. Jawahar, R. Gnanamoorthy, and M. Balasubramanian, “Tribological Behaviour of Clay-Thermoset Polyester Nanocomposites,” Wear, 261(7–8) (2006), pp. 835–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Dasari et al., “Clay Exfoliation and Organic Modification on Wear of Nylon 6 Nanocomposites Processed by Different Routes,” Composites Science and Technology, 65(15–16) (2005), pp. 2314–2328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    W. Liu, S.V. Hoa, and M. Pugh, “Fracture Toughness and Water Uptake of High-Performance Epoxy/Nanoclay Nanocomposites,” Composites Science and Technology, 65 (2005), pp. 2364–2373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    C.E. Powell and G.W. Beall, “Physical Properties of Polymer/Clay Nanocomposites,” Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science (2006), DOI: 10.1016/j.cossms.2006.09.001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikhil Gupta
    • 1
  • Tien Chih Lin
    • 1
  • Michael Shapiro
    • 2
  1. 1.Composite Materials and Mechanics Laboratory, Mechanical, Aerospace and Manufacturing Engineering DepartmentPolytechnic UniversityBrooklynUSA
  2. 2.Yeshiva UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations