, Volume 58, Issue 11, pp 87–91 | Cite as

Co-continuous composite materials for friction and braking applications

  • Glenn S. Daehn
  • Michael C. Breslin
Overview Low-Cost Composites in Vehicle Manufacture


Reactive infiltration of precursor ceramics (e.g., the formation of an alumina-aluminum composite by reaction of silica in liquid aluminum) is a low-cost and versatile method of creating materials with interpenetrating co-continuous ceramic and metal phases. By controlling the composition and microstructure of the precursor and the composition of the reaction bath, one can control the structure and properties of the resulting material. This paper summarizes preliminary attempts to use these routes to create next-generation materials for automotive brake rotors. Two types of materials were tested. The first is a two-level composite of a co-continuous alumina-aluminum structure that surrounds SiC particles that provide thermal conductivity. For higher-temperature use, the aluminum alloy is replaced with aluminum-bronze. Both materials show friction and wear properties similar to cast iron, but with half the density and better thermal conductivity.


Cast Iron Stir Processing Friction Friction Material Friction Pair Liquid Aluminum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1. Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.C. Breslin, “Process for Preparing Ceramic-Metal Composite Bodies”, BFD, Inc., U.S. patent 5,214,011 (25 May 1993).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K.G. Ewsuk et al., Metall. Mat. Trans., 27A (8) (1996), pp. 2122–2129.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.C. Breslin et al., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., 5 (4) (1994), pp. 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.C. Breslin et al., Mat. Sci. Eng., A195 (1995), pp. 113–119.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G.S. Daehn et al., Acta Mater., 44 (1) (1996), pp. 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Liu and U. Köster, Mater. Sci. Eng., A210 (1996), pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Farmer (Senior Research Thesis, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Ohio State University, 2000). Note: Weibull statistics are based on over 40 measurements for each material.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.Y. Chen and M.C. Breslin, Wear, 249 (2002), pp. 868–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. Ceschini et al., Wear, 216 (1998), pp. 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. Imbeni, I.M. Hutchings, and M.C. Breslin, Wear, 235 (1999), pp. 233–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Herling et al., PNNL-DOE report, Friction Pair Testing of Candidate Metal Composite Brake Materials (2002), full report available at www.exceramaterials. com/MMC_Friction_PNNL_Report.pdf.Google Scholar
  13. 13. program/2004_hv_optimization.pdf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenn S. Daehn
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael C. Breslin
    • 1
  1. 1.Excera Materials Group in Worthington
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and Engineering at Ohio State University in Columbus

Personalised recommendations