, Volume 58, Issue 11, pp 28–35 | Cite as

Virtual aluminum castings: An industrial application of ICME

  • John Allison
  • Mei Li
  • C. Wolverton
  • XuMing Su
Overview Integrated Computational Materials Engineering


The automotive product design and manufacturing community is continually besieged by Hercule an engineering, timing, and cost challenges. Nowhere is this more evident than in the development of designs and manufacturing processes for cast aluminum engine blocks and cylinder heads. Increasing engine performance requirements coupled with stringent weight and packaging constraints are pushing aluminum alloys to the limits of their capabilities. To provide high-quality blocks and heads at the lowest possible cost, manufacturing process engineers are required to find increasingly innovative ways to cast and heat treat components. Additionally, to remain competitive, products and manufacturing methods must be developed and implemented in record time. To bridge the gaps between program needs and engineering reality, the use of robust computational models in up-front analysis will take on an increasingly important role. This article describes just such a computational approach, the Virtual Aluminum Castings methodology, which was developed and implemented at Ford Motor Company and demonstrates the feasibility and benefits of integrated computational materials engineering.


Residual Stress Cylinder Head Fatigue High Cycle Ford Motor Company Residual Stress Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    John Allison, D. Backman, and L. Christodoulou, JOM, in this issue.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mei Li and John Allison, Simulation of Aluminum Casting Process: From Alloy Design to Mechanical properties, ed. Qigui Wang, et al., (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 2006), p. 91.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Li et al., Metallurgical Modeling for Aluminum Alloys. ed. M. Tiryakioglu and L. Lalli, (Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 2003) p. 79.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Wolverton and J. Allison, U.S. patent 6,858,103 (2005).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Weakley, et al., Met. and Matis. Trans. A, 35A (2004), p. 2407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Vaithyanathan, C. Wolverton, and L.-Q. Chen, Acta Mater., 52 (2004), p. 2973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. Vaithyanathan, C. Wolverton, and L.-Q. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88 (2002), p. 125503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Wolverton et al., Acta Mater. 50 (2002), p. 2187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Wolverton and V. Ozolins, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86 (2001), p. 5518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Boileau et al., SAE Paper 2003-01-0657 (Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, 2003).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Caton, J. Jones, and J. Allison, Fatigue Crack Growth Thresholds, Endurance Limits and Design, ASTM STP 1372 ed. J.C. Newman and R.S. Piascik (West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2000).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xuming Su et al., “Thermal and Residual Stress Analysis for Engine Block with Cast-in Liners” (Presentation at the ASM Material Solution and Exhibition, Pittsburgh, PA 15–17 October 2003).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ulrich Weiss et al. Proceedings of Haus der Technik (Essen, Germany: House of Technology, 2003).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Sehitoglu et al., Met. and Malls. Trans. A. 20A (1989), p. 1755.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    X. Su et al. SAE Paper 2002-01-0657 (Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, 2002).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Lasecki, X. Su, and J. Allison, SAE Paper 2006-01-0324 (Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, 2006).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Allison
    • 1
  • Mei Li
    • 1
  • C. Wolverton
    • 1
  • XuMing Su
    • 1
  1. 1.Ford Motor Company in Dearborn

Personalised recommendations