Abstract
The aluminum can industry is facing a new challenge in declining recycling rates in the United States. The economic benefits of aluminum recycling are wide-spread and important not only to the U.S. aluminum industry, but to the economy in general. With an Alfred P. Sloan Foundation grant, Secat Inc. and the University of Kentucky, through the Center for a Sustainable Aluminum Industry, are conducting a project in Fayette County, Kentucky, to understand and improve recycling rates using Six Sigma methodology. This application of Six Sigma is the first methodological attempt at improving the recycling rate. To date, the preliminary process map has been identified and an initial estimate of the true recycling rate has been developed. The information gathered during this project and described in this article is expected to serve as a steppingstone to a national effort to increase U.S. recycling rates. The result, it is anticipated, will be increased economic development opportunities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aluminum Facts at a Glance (Washington, D.C.: The Aluminum Association Inc., September 2003).
W.F. Hosford and J.L. Duncan, “The Aluminum Beverage Can,” Scientific American, (September 1994), pp. 48–53.
P. Millbank, “Aluminum Recycling Vital to Global Supply Chain”, Aluminium International Today. (September/October 2004), pp. 44–49.
B. Lackey, The Aluminum Industry in Kentucky (Frankfort, KY: Division of Research, Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development; 2002).
S.M. Kaufman et al., “The State of Garbage in America, 14th Annual Nationwide Survey of Solid Waste Management in the United States,” BioCycle (January 2004), pp. 31–41.
Motorola, “The Inventors of Six Sigma” (accessed March 2006), www.motorola.com/content.jsp ?globalObjectld=1778-4162.
J.A. De Feo and W.W. Barnard, JURAN Institute's Six Sigma Breakthrough and Beyond—Quality Performance Breakthrough Methods (New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, 2005).
Charles Waxer, “Six Sigma Organizational Structure,” www.isixsigma.com/library/content/c010128a.asp (accessed March 2006).
“General Electric Annual Report 1997” (accessed March 2006), www.ge.com/annua/97/annua/97.pdf.
“Six Sigma,” Wikipedia (accessed March 2006). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Sigma#_note-0.
“Closing the Loop: Recyclability Gives Aluminum the Environmental Edge,” Aluminum Now, 4 (2002), p. 20.
Aluminum Beverage Can Waste Passes the “One Trillion Mark (Washington, D.C.: Container Recycling Institute, 24 May 2004).
S. Das and J. Liew, “Evaluation of Lexington-Fayette Urban County Recycling” (Presentation at the Aluminum Can Council Meeting, Washington, D.C., 25 May 2005).
2003 Census Report (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce & Bureau of Census, 2003).
Peter D. Hart Research Associates, “Consumer Attitudes Toward Aluminum Beverage Cans” (Presentation for Can Manufacturers Institute. 2002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Subodh K. Das is the president and chief executive officer of Secat, director for the Center for Aluminum Technology, executive director for the Sloan Industry Center for a Sustainable Aluminum Industry, and adjunct professor of mechanical engineering and University of Kentucky
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Das, S.K., Hughes, M. Improving aluminum can recycling rates: A six sigma study in Kentucky. JOM 58, 27–31 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-006-0049-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-006-0049-1