Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting remaining life by fusing the physics of failure modeling with diagnostics

  • Research Summary
  • Materials Prognosis
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Technology that enables failure prediction of critical machine components (prognostics) has the potential to significantly reduce maintenance costs and increase availability and safety. This article summarizes a research effort funded through the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and Naval Air System Command aimed at enhancing prognostic accuracy through more advanced physics-of-failure modeling and intelligent utilization of relevant diagnostic information. H-60 helicopter gear is used as a case study to introduce both stochastic sub-zone crack initiation and three-dimensional fracture mechanics lifing models along with adaptive model updating techniques for tuning key failure mode variables at a local material/damage site based on fused vibration features. The overall prognostic scheme is aimed at minimizing inherent modeling and operational uncertainties via sensed system measurements that evolve as damage progresses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. Hartman and A. Hess, “A USN Strategy for Mechanical and Propulsion System Prognostics with Demonstration Results” (Paper presented at the AHS Forum 58, Quebec, Canada, 11–13 June 2002).

  2. G. Kacprzynski et al., “Calibration of Failure Mechanism-Based Prognosis with Vibratory State Awareness Applied to the H-60 Gearbox,” Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Aerospace Conf., (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE).

  3. M. Roemer and G. Kacprzynski, “Development of Diagnostic and Prognostic Technologies for Aerospace Health Management Applications,” Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conf., (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE).

  4. Rachel E. Cohen, George Krauss, and David K. Matlock, “Bending Fatigue Performance of Carburized 4320 Steel,” SAE Technical Paper Series #930963 (Warrendale, PA: SAE, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Socie, “A Procedure for Estimating the Total Fatigue Life of Notched and Cracked Members,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 11 (1) (1979), pp. 851–859.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J.A. Bannantine, J.J. Comer, and J.L. Handrock, Fundamentals of Metals Fatigue Analysis (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  7. David G. Lewicki, “Gear Crack Propagation Path Studies—Guidelines for Ultra-Safe Design,” NASA/TM—2001-211073 (July 2001).

  8. ASM Handbook Volume 19: Fatigue and Fracture (Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 1996).

  9. L.E. Spievak, P.A. Wawrzynek, and A.R. Ingraffea, “Simulating Fatigue Crack Growth in Spiral Bevel Gears” (M.S. Thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, August 1999).

  10. J. Ma, “Energy Operator and Other Demodulation Approaches to Gear Defect Detection,” Proceedings of the 49th Meeting of the Society for Machinery Failure Prevention Technology, (Willowbrook, IL: Vibration Institute Publishing, 1995), pp. 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Editor’s Note: Presentation of this paper is supported by the Air Force Research Laboratory, under agreement number F33615-01-D-5801. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notational thereon. The views and conclusions contained herein are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of the Air Force Research Laboratory or the U.S. Government.

For more information, contact G.J. Kacprzynski, Impact Technologies LLC, 125 Tech Park Drive, Rochester, New York 14623; (585) 424-1990; fax (585) 424-1177; e-mail greg.kacprzynski@impacttek.com.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kacprzynski, G.J., Sarlashkar, A., Roemer, M.J. et al. Predicting remaining life by fusing the physics of failure modeling with diagnostics. JOM 56, 29–35 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-004-0029-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-004-0029-2

Keywords

Navigation