Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability of assessing the coronal curvature of children with scoliosis by using ultrasound images

  • Original Clinical Article
  • Published:
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the coronal curvature asymmetry of children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using the center of lamina (COL) method on ultrasound (US) images.

Methods

A cadaver spinal column phantom which was manipulated to present 30 scoliotic curves of varying severity of scoliotic deformities was scanned using both the US and laser scanner (LS) systems. Three observers of varying experience and skill measured the coronal curvature using the Cobb method on the LS images and the COL method on the US images. All of the measurements were performed twice, with a 1-week interval to reduce memory bias. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), the mean absolute differences (MAD), and the error index (EI) were calculated to determine the agreement on selecting the end vertebrae. In addition, five AIS subjects were scanned using the US system. One observer measured the coronal curvature on the US images twice, and the measurements were compared with the Cobb angle reported in the clinical records.

Results

In the phantom study, the COL method showed high intra- and inter-observer reliabilities, with all ICC values >0.88. The maximum MAD of the COL measurements between different sessions among all observers was <4.1°. The EI values of the US method had similar end-vertebra selections as the LS method. The results of the pilot study showed a high intra-reliability for the US measurements. The measured difference between the Cobb and COL methods was 0.7° ± 0.5°.

Conclusions

The COL method using US images appears to be a very reliable method for measuring the coronal curvature in AIS without the need to expose the patient to radiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cobb J (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. In: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Instructional Course Lectures, vol 5. Edwards, Ann Arbor, pp 261–275

  2. Katz DE, Richards BS, Browne RH, Herring JA (1997) A comparison between the Boston brace and the Charleston bending brace in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 22(12):1302–1312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjonen T, Ylikoski M, Schlenzka D, Helenius M, Poussa M (2003) Harrington and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Long-term functional and radiographic outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A(12):2303–2309

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tan KJ, Moe MM, Vaithinathan R, Wong HK (2009) Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis: follow-up study to skeletal maturity. Spine 34(7):697–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG (1990) Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intra-observer and inter-observer variation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(3):328–333

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, Kehl D, Cowie GH (1990) Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72A(3):320–327

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shea KG, Stevens PM, Nelson M, Smith JT, Masters KS, Yandow S (1998) A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement. Intra-observer measurement variability for Cobb angles. Spine 23(5):551–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Srinivasalu S, Modi HN, Smehta S, Suh S-W, Chen T, Murun T (2008) Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis using computer measurement of digitally acquired radiographs. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability. Asian Spine J 2(2):90–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mok JM, Berven SH, Diab M, Hackbarth M, Hu SS, Deviren V (2008) Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 33(6):681–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chockalingam N, Dangerfield PH, Giakas G, Cochrane T, Dorgan JC (2002) Computer-assisted Cobb measurement of scoliosis. Eur Spine J 11(4):353–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stokes IA, Aronsson DD (2006) Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King Classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis. Spine 31(6):665–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang JH, Lou E, Le LH, Hill DL, Raso JV, Wang YY (2009) Automatic Cobb measurement of scoliosis based on fuzzy Hough transform with vertebral shape prior. J Digit Imaging 22(5):463–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoffman DA, Lonstein JE, Morin MM, Visscher W, Harris BS 3rd, Boice JD Jr (1989) Breast cancer in women with scoliosis exposed to multiple diagnostic X-rays. J Natl Cancer Inst 81(17):1307–1312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Hacker DG, Luckyanov N, Land CE (2000) Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. Scoliosis Cohort Study. Spine 25(16):2052–2063

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Suzuki S, Yamamuro T, Shikata J, Shimizu K, Iida H (1989) Ultrasound measurement of vertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71(2):252–255

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Li M, Cheng J, Ying M, Ng B, Zheng Y, Lam T, Wong W, Wong M (2012) Could clinical ultrasound improve the fitting of spinal orthosis for the patients with AIS? Eur Spine J 21(10):1926–1935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tallroth K, Ylikoski M, Taavitsainen M (1987) Sonographic measurement of vertebral dislocation in spondylolisthesis. 7(5):538–540

  18. Chen W, Lou EH, Le LH (2011) Using ultrasound imaging to identify landmarks in vertebra models to assess spinal deformity. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011:8495–8498

  19. Chen W, Le L, Lou E (2012) Ultrasound imaging of spinal vertebrae to study scoliosis. Open J Acoust 2(3):95–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McGraw KO, Wong SP (1996) Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1(1):30–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Currier DP (1984) Elements of research in physical therapy, 3rd edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 160–171

    Google Scholar 

  23. Oda M, Rauh S, Gregory PB, Silverman FN, Bleck EE (1982) The significance of roentgenographic measurement in scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2(4):378–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuklo TR, Potter BK, O’Brien MF, Schroeder TM, Lenke LG, Polly DW Jr (2005) Reliability analysis for digital adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(2):152–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, Winter P, Wachter R, Bach CM (2007) Inter- and intra-observer reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur Spine J 16(10):1587–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wills BP, Auerbach JD, Zhu X, Caird MS, Horn BD, Flynn JM, Drummond DS, Dormans JP, Ecker ML (2007) Comparison of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis radiographs with preselected end vertebrae: traditional versus digital acquisition. Spine 32(1):98–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Women and Children’s Health Research Institute, the China Scholarship Council, and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edmond H. M. Lou.

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, W., Lou, E.H.M., Zhang, P.Q. et al. Reliability of assessing the coronal curvature of children with scoliosis by using ultrasound images. J Child Orthop 7, 521–529 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-013-0539-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-013-0539-y

Keywords

Navigation