Journal of Children's Orthopaedics

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 269–276 | Cite as

Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: the results of an evolving protocol of management

Original Clinical Article

Abstract

Purpose

This retrospective cohort study assesses the outcomes of a protocol of management, based on the recommendations of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) multi-centre study, for the management of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia.

Methods

Utilising an incremental protocol of bracing, intramedullary rods and circular frame fixation with or without bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), 11 patients had reached skeletal maturity or had follow up of 5 years from radiological union of the pseudarthrosis. Demographic data, deformity parameters before and after treatment, and functional outcome scores were recorded.

Results

Ten of the 11 patients successfully healed and two sustained a refracture. All deformity parameters improved and a mean leg length discrepancy of 2.5 cm (range 0–7.5 cm) existed at the time of the last follow up. Some pseudarthroses healed with deformity correction and rod insertion alone. Six of the 11 patients had a confirmed diagnosis of neurofibromatosis and nine had sustained a fracture before 4 years of age. Refracture was associated with malalignment after healing.

Conclusion

This method of treatment provides a successful stepwise protocol for the management of this complex disorder, avoiding the use of aggressive limb reconstruction techniques at a young age in some cases.

Level of evidenceCase series Level IV.

Keywords

Pseudarthrosis of the tibia Treatment Management 

References

  1. 1.
    Hefti F, Bollini G, Dungl P, Fixsen J, Grill F, Ippolito E, Romanus B, Tudisco C, Wientroub S (2000) Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: history, etiology, classification, and epidemiologic data. J Pediatr Orthop B 9(1):11–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andersen KS (1972) Congenital angulation of the lower leg and congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia in Denmark. Acta Orthop Scand 43:539–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyd HB (1982) Pathology and natural history of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 166:5–13Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crawford AH, Schorry EK (1999) Neurofibromatosis in children: the role of the orthopaedist. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7(4):217–230Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wientroub S, Grill F (2000) Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: part 1. European Pediatric Orthopaedic Society multicenter study of congenital pseudoarthrosis. J Pediatr Orthop B 9(1):1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee DY, Cho TJ, Lee HR, Lee K, Moon HJ, Park MS, Yoo WJ, Chung CY, Choi IH (2011) Disturbed osteoblastic differentiation of fibrous hamartoma cell from congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia associated with neurofibromatosis type I. Clin Orthop Surg 3(3):230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    El-Hoss J, Sullivan K, Cheng T, Yu NY, Bobyn JD, Peacock L, Mikulec K, Baldock P, Alexander IE, Schindeler A, Little DG (2012) A murine model of neurofibromatosis type 1 tibial pseudarthrosis featuring proliferative fibrous tissue and osteoclast-like cells. J Bone Miner Res 27(1):68–78. doi:10.1002/jbmr.528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McCarthy RE (1982) Amputation for congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Indications and techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 166:58–61Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morrissy RT, Riseborough EJ, Hall JE (1981) Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63(3):367–375Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tudisco C, Bollini G, Dungl P, Fixen J, Grill F, Hefti F, Romanus B, Wientroub S (2000) Functional results at the end of skeletal growth in 30 patients affected by congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia. J Pediatr Orthop B 9(2):94–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Inan M, El Rassi G, Riddle EC, Kumar SJ (2006) Residual deformities following successful initial bone union in congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia. J Pediatr Orthop 26(3):393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grill F, Bollini G, Dungl P, Fixsen J, Hefti F, Ippolito E, Romanus B, Tudisco C, Wientroub S (2000) Treatment approaches for congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia: results of the EPOS multicenter study. European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS). J Pediatr Orthop B 9(2):75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Romanus B, Bollini G, Dungl P, Fixsen J, Grill F, Hefti F, Ippolito E, Tudisco C, Wientroub S (2000) Free vascular fibular transfer in congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia: results of the EPOS multicenter study. European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS). J Pediatr Orthop B 9(2):90–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keret D, Bollini G, Dungl P, Fixsen J, Grill F, Hefti F, Ippolito E, Romanus B, Tudisco C, Wientroub S (2000) The fibula in congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia: the EPOS multicenter study. European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS). J Pediatr Orthop B 9(2):69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ohnishi I, Sato W, Matsuyama J, Yajima H, Haga N, Kamegaya M, Minami A, Sato M, Yoshino S, Oki T, Nakamura K (2005) Treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: a multicenter study in Japan. J Pediatr Orthop 25(2):219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Plint AC, Gaboury I, Owen J, Young NL (2003) Activities scale for kids: an analysis of normals. J Pediatr Orthop 23(6):788–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morris C, Doll HA, Wainwright A, Theologis T, Fitzpatrick R (2008) The Oxford ankle foot questionnaire for children: scaling, reliability and validity. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1451–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boyd HB (1982) Pathology and natural history of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 166:5–13Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Anticevic D, Jelic M, Vukicevic S (2006) Treatment of a congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia by osteogenic protein-1 (bone morphogenetic protein-7): a case report. J Pediatr Orthop B 15(3):220–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spiro AS, Babin K, Lipovac S, Stenger P, Mladenov K, Rupprecht M, Rueger JM, Stuecker R (2011) Combined treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia, including recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a case series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(5):695–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Richards BS, Oetgen ME, Johnston CE (2010) The use of rhBMP-2 for the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: a case series. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(1):177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee FY, Sinicropi SM, Lee FS, Vitale MG, Roye DP Jr, Choi IH (2006) Treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7 (rhBMP-7). A report of five cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(3):627–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fabeck L, Ghafil D, Gerroudj M, Baillon R, Delincé P (2006) Bone morphogenetic protein 7 in the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(1):116–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilkinson JM, Scott BW, Clarke AM, Bell MJ (1998) Surgical stabilisation of the lower limb in osteogenesis imperfecta using the Sheffield Telescopic Intramedullary Rod System. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(6):999–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mathieu L, Vialle R, Thevenin-Lemoine C, Mary P, Damsin JP (2008) Association of Ilizarov’s technique and intramedullary rodding in the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Child Orthop 2(6):449–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Korompilias AV, Lykissas MG, Soucacos PN, Kostas I, Beris AE (2009) Vascularized free fibular bone graft in the management of congenital tibial pseudarthrosis. Microsurgery 29:346–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sakamoto A, Yoshida T, Uchida Y, Kojima T, Kubota H, Iwamoto Y (2008) Long-term follow-up on the use of vascularized fibular graft for the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Orthop Surg Res 3:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weiland AJ, Weiss AP, Moore JR, Tolo VT (1990) Vascularized fibular grafts in the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:654–662Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pho RW, Levack B, Satku K, Patradul A (1985) Free vascularised fibular graft in the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67(1):64–70Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Heikkinen ES, Poyhonen MH, Kinnunen PK, Seppänen UI (1999) Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Treatment and outcome at skeletal maturity in 10 children. Acta Orthop Scand 70(3):275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ghanem I, Damsin JP, Carlioz H (1997) Ilizarov technique in the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Pediatr Orthop 17(5):685–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Boero S, Catagni M, Donzelli O, Facchini R, Frediani PV (1997) Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia associated with neurofibromatosis-1: treatment with Ilizarov’s device. J Pediatr Orthop 17(5):675–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kristiansen LP, Steen H, Terjesen T (2003) Residual challenges after healing of congenital pseudarthrosis in the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 414:228–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Paley D, Catagni M, Argnani F, Prevot J, Bell D, Armstrong P (1992) Treatment of congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia using the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 280:81–93Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Thabet AM, Paley D, Kocaoglu M, Eralp L, Herzenberg JE, Ergin ON (2008) Periosteal grafting for congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: a preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(12):2981–2994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Joseph B, Somaraju VV, Shetty SK (2003) Management of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia in children under 3 years of age: effect of early surgery on union of the pseudarthrosis and growth of the limb. J Pediatr Orthop 23(6):740–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EPOS 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS TrustLondonUK
  2. 2.Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS TrustMaidstoneUK

Personalised recommendations