Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: the results of an evolving protocol of management
- 235 Downloads
This retrospective cohort study assesses the outcomes of a protocol of management, based on the recommendations of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) multi-centre study, for the management of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia.
Utilising an incremental protocol of bracing, intramedullary rods and circular frame fixation with or without bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), 11 patients had reached skeletal maturity or had follow up of 5 years from radiological union of the pseudarthrosis. Demographic data, deformity parameters before and after treatment, and functional outcome scores were recorded.
Ten of the 11 patients successfully healed and two sustained a refracture. All deformity parameters improved and a mean leg length discrepancy of 2.5 cm (range 0–7.5 cm) existed at the time of the last follow up. Some pseudarthroses healed with deformity correction and rod insertion alone. Six of the 11 patients had a confirmed diagnosis of neurofibromatosis and nine had sustained a fracture before 4 years of age. Refracture was associated with malalignment after healing.
This method of treatment provides a successful stepwise protocol for the management of this complex disorder, avoiding the use of aggressive limb reconstruction techniques at a young age in some cases.
Level of evidenceCase series Level IV.
KeywordsPseudarthrosis of the tibia Treatment Management
- 3.Boyd HB (1982) Pathology and natural history of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 166:5–13Google Scholar
- 4.Crawford AH, Schorry EK (1999) Neurofibromatosis in children: the role of the orthopaedist. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7(4):217–230Google Scholar
- 7.El-Hoss J, Sullivan K, Cheng T, Yu NY, Bobyn JD, Peacock L, Mikulec K, Baldock P, Alexander IE, Schindeler A, Little DG (2012) A murine model of neurofibromatosis type 1 tibial pseudarthrosis featuring proliferative fibrous tissue and osteoclast-like cells. J Bone Miner Res 27(1):68–78. doi:10.1002/jbmr.528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.McCarthy RE (1982) Amputation for congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Indications and techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 166:58–61Google Scholar
- 9.Morrissy RT, Riseborough EJ, Hall JE (1981) Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63(3):367–375Google Scholar
- 12.Grill F, Bollini G, Dungl P, Fixsen J, Hefti F, Ippolito E, Romanus B, Tudisco C, Wientroub S (2000) Treatment approaches for congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia: results of the EPOS multicenter study. European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS). J Pediatr Orthop B 9(2):75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Romanus B, Bollini G, Dungl P, Fixsen J, Grill F, Hefti F, Ippolito E, Tudisco C, Wientroub S (2000) Free vascular fibular transfer in congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia: results of the EPOS multicenter study. European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS). J Pediatr Orthop B 9(2):90–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Boyd HB (1982) Pathology and natural history of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 166:5–13Google Scholar
- 28.Weiland AJ, Weiss AP, Moore JR, Tolo VT (1990) Vascularized fibular grafts in the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:654–662Google Scholar
- 29.Pho RW, Levack B, Satku K, Patradul A (1985) Free vascularised fibular graft in the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67(1):64–70Google Scholar
- 34.Paley D, Catagni M, Argnani F, Prevot J, Bell D, Armstrong P (1992) Treatment of congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia using the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 280:81–93Google Scholar