Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The modulation of spinal growth with nitinol intervertebral stapling in an established swine model

  • Basic Science
  • Published:
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics

Abstract

Purpose

Anterior spinal stapling for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has been shown to slow progression in small curves; however, its role in larger curves remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of nitinol staples to modulate spinal growth by evaluating the two-dimensional and three-dimensional morphological and histological effects of this method in a well-established porcine model.

Methods

Three immature Yucatan miniature pigs underwent intervertebral stapling. Two staples spanned each of three consecutive mid-thoracic discs and epiphyses. Monthly radiographs were obtained. Computed tomography (CT) was conducted at harvest after 6 months of growth. Measurements of wedging and height for each disc and vertebral body were conducted. Micro CT was used to compare physeal closure between stapled and non-stapled levels. Histology of the growth plate also compared the hypertrophic zone thickness for control and stapled vertebrae.

Results

After 6 months of stapled growth, the average coronal Cobb angle of the stapled segments increased by 7.7 ± 2.0° and kyphosis increased by 3.3 ± 0.6° compared to preoperative curves. Increased vertebral wedging and decreased disc height (p < 0.001) were noted in stapled regions. Overall, 26 ± 23 % of each growth plate was closed in the stapled segments, with 6 ± 8 % closure in the unstapled levels. No difference was observed regarding the hypertrophic zone height when comparing instrumented to uninstrumented levels, nor was a difference recognized when comparing right versus left regions within stapled levels alone.

Conclusions

Six months of nitinol intervertebral stapling created a mild coronal and sagittal deformity associated with reduced vertebral and disc height, and increased coronal vertebral and sagittal disc wedging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guo X, Chau WW, Chan YL, Cheng JC, Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH (2005) Relative anterior spinal overgrowth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—result of disproportionate endochondral-membranous bone growth? Summary of an electronic focus group debate of the IBSE. Eur Spine J 14(9):862–873. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-1002-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Roaf R (1960) Vertebral growth and its mechanical control. J Bone Joint Surg Br 42-B:40–59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dickson RA, Lawton JO, Archer IA, Butt WP (1984) The pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Biplanar spinal asymmetry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66(1):8–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Somerville EW (1952) Rotational lordosis; the development of single curve. J Bone Joint Surg Br 34-B(3):421–427

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lavelle WF, Samdani AF, Cahill PJ, Betz RR (2011) Clinical outcomes of nitinol staples for preventing curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 31(1 Suppl):S107–S113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Betz RR, Ranade A, Samdani AF, Chafetz R, D’Andrea LP, Gaughan JP et al (2010) Vertebral body stapling: a fusionless treatment option for a growing child with moderate idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 35(2):169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Betz RR, Kim J, D’Andrea LP, Mulcahey MJ, Balsara RK, Clements DH (2003) An innovative technique of vertebral body stapling for the treatment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a feasibility, safety, and utility study. Spine 28(20):S255–S265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Newton PO, Upasani VV, Farnsworth CL, Oka R, Chambers RC, Dwek J et al (2008) Spinal growth modulation with use of a tether in an immature porcine model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(12):2695–2706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Newton PO, Farnsworth CL, Upasani VV, Chambers RC, Varley E, Tsutsui S (2011) Effects of intraoperative tensioning of an anterolateral spinal tether on spinal growth modulation in a porcine model. Spine 36(2):109–117

    Google Scholar 

  10. Upasani VV, Farnsworth CL, Chambers RC, Bastrom TP, Williams GM, Sah RL et al (2011) Intervertebral disc health preservation after six months of spinal growth modulation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(15):1408–1416. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.00247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Weinstein SL, Zavala DC, Ponseti IV (1981) Idiopathic scoliosis: long-term follow-up and prognosis in untreated patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63(5):702–712

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Braun JT, Akyuz E, Ogilvie JW, Bachus KN (2005) The efficacy and integrity of shape memory alloy staples and bone anchors with ligament tethers in the fusionless treatment of experimental scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(9):2038–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nachlas IW, Borden JN (1951) The cure of experimental scoliosis by directed growth control. J Bone Joint Surg Am 33(A:1):24–34

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith AD, Von Lackum WH, Wylie R (1954) An operation for stapling vertebral bodies in congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36(A:2):342–348

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Braun JT, Ogilvie JW, Akyuz E, Brodke DS, Bachus KN, Stefko RM (2003) Experimental scoliosis in an immature goat model: a method that creates idiopathic-type deformity with minimal violation of the spinal elements along the curve. Spine 28(19):2198–2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Braun JT, Ogilvie JW, Akyuz E, Brodke DS, Bachus KN (2004) Fusionless scoliosis correction using a shape memory alloy staple in the anterior thoracic spine of the immature goat. Spine 29(18):1980–1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG (1990) Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(3):328–333

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Newton PO, Farnsworth CL, Faro FD, Mahar AT, Odell TR, Mohamad F et al (2008) Spinal growth modulation with an anterolateral flexible tether in an immature bovine model: disc health and motion preservation. Spine 33(7):724–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwab F, Patel A, Lafage V, Farcy JP (2009) A porcine model for progressive thoracic scoliosis. Spine 34(11):E397–E404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Braun JT, Ogilvie JW, Akyuz E, Brodke DS, Bachus KN (2006) Creation of an experimental idiopathic-type scoliosis in an immature goat model using a flexible posterior asymmetric tether. Spine 31(13):1410–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Braun JT, Hoffman M, Akyuz E, Ogilvie JW, Brodke DS, Bachus KN (2006) Mechanical modulation of vertebral growth in the fusionless treatment of progressive scoliosis in an experimental model. Spine 31(12):1314–1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Braun JT, Hines JL, Akyuz E, Vallera C, Ogilvie JW (2006) Relative versus absolute modulation of growth in the fusionless treatment of experimental scoliosis. Spine 31(16):1776–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hunt KJ, Braun JT, Christensen BA (2010) The effect of two clinically relevant fusionless scoliosis implant strategies on the health of the intervertebral disc: analysis in an immature goat model. Spine 35(4):371–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zheng GQ, Zhang YG, Wang Y, Zhang XS, Zhang RY, Zhang W (2009) An experimental study of correction of idiopathic-type scoliosis by staple. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 47(2):136–138

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wall EJ, Bylski-Austrow DI, Kolata RJ, Crawford AH (2005) Endoscopic mechanical spinal hemiepiphysiodesis modifies spine growth. Spine 30(10):1148–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank Esther Cory for her assistance with the μCT accession and Karen Bowden for the histological processing, and acknowledge Children’s Specialists of San Diego for the support of this study and Medtronic Spinal and Biologics for loaning the SMA staples and instrumentation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter O. Newton.

About this article

Cite this article

Carreau, J.H., Farnsworth, C.L., Glaser, D.A. et al. The modulation of spinal growth with nitinol intervertebral stapling in an established swine model. J Child Orthop 6, 241–253 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0417-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0417-z

Keywords

Navigation