Advertisement

Journal of Children's Orthopaedics

, Volume 5, Issue 6, pp 425–431 | Cite as

Residual hip dysplasia as a risk factor for osteoarthritis in 45 years follow-up of late-detected hip dislocation

  • Terje TerjesenEmail author
Original Clinical Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was to assess the role of residual hip dysplasia as a risk factor for osteoarthritis (OA) in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

Methods

Fifty-one patients (60 hips) with late-detected DDH were studied. Reduction had been performed at a mean age of 19 months (range 4–65 months). On radiographs at age 8–10 years, at skeletal maturity, and at long-term follow-up, femoral head coverage was assessed using the migration percentage (MP) and centre-edge (CE) angle. OA was diagnosed if the minimum joint space width of the upper part of the joint was <2.0 mm.

Results

The mean age at the last follow-up was 45 years (range 43–49 years) in patients who had not undergone total hip replacement (THR). Ten patients had developed OA and eight of them had undergone THR at a mean age of 40 years (range 32–47 years). There was a clear association between OA and residual hip dysplasia. At the last follow-up, 37 hips had normal CE angles (20° or higher) and OA had developed in only two of them (5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1–18%). Hip dysplasia without subluxation (CE angle 10–19°) was seen in 18 hips, of which 14 hips had good outcome and four had OA (22%; 95% CI 6–48%). Subluxation occurred in five hips, of which one had a good long-term outcome and four had OA (80%; 95% CI 28–99%). In patients without late reconstructive surgery, MP increased from the age of 10 years to skeletal maturity; thereafter, no significant change occurred. The CE angle did not change significantly between the age of 10 years and the last follow-up.

Conclusion

Hip dysplasia without subluxation has a relatively good long-term prognosis. Subluxation is a risk factor for osteoarthritis. Thus, children with MP above 33% and CE angle under 10° should be evaluated for reconstructive surgery in order to improve the long-term outcome.

Keywords

Developmental hip dislocation Residual hip dysplasia Long-term follow-up Osteoarthritis of the hip 

References

  1. 1.
    Albinana J, Dolan LA, Spratt KF, Morcuende J, Meyer MD, Weinstein SL (2004) Acetabular dysplasia after treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Implications for secondary procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:876–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angliss R, Fujii G, Pickvance E, Wainwright AM, Benson MKD (2005) Surgical treatment of late developmental displacement of the hip. Results after 33 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Terjesen T, Halvorsen V (2007) Long-term results after closed reduction of late-detected hip dislocation: 60 patients followed up to skeletal maturity. Acta Orthop 78:236–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wiberg G (1939) Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint. Acta Chir Scand 83(Suppl 58):7–135Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stulberg SD, Harris WH (1974) Acetabular dysplasia and development of osteoarthritis of the hip. In: Harris WH (ed) The hip. Proceedings of the Second Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society. Mosby, St. Louis, MO, pp 82–93Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooperman DR, Wallensten R, Stulberg SD (1983) Acetabular dysplasia in the adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res 175:79–85Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murphy SB, Ganz R, Müller ME (1995) The prognosis in untreated dysplasia of the hip. A study of radiographic factors that predict the outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:985–989Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malvitz TA, Weinstein SL (1994) Closed reduction for congenital dysplasia of the hip. Functional and radiographic results after an average of thirty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:1777–1792Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salter RB, Dubos JP (1974) The first fifteen year’s personal experience with innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 98:72–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thomas SR, Wedge JH, Salter RB (2007) Outcome at forty-five years after open reduction and innominate osteotomy for late-presenting developmental dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2341–2350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spitzy H (1924) Künstliche pfannendachbildung. Z Orthop 43:284–294Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reimers J (1980) The stability of the hip in children: a radiological study of the results of muscle surgery in cerebral palsy. Acta Orthop Scand 51(Suppl 184):4–91Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S (2005) Hip dysplasia: a significant risk factor for the development of hip osteoarthritis. A cross-sectional survey. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44:211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Terjesen T, Gunderson RB (2011) Reliability of radiographic parameters in adults with hip dysplasia. Skel Radiol (accepted for publication)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Troelsen A, Jacobsen S, Rømer L, Søballe K (2008) Weightbearing anteroposterior pelvic radiographs are recommended in DDH assessment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:813–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Troelsen A, Rømer L, Kring S, Elmengaard B, Søballe K (2010) Assessment of hip dysplasia and osteoarthritis: variability of different methods. Acta Radiol 51:187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hartofilakidis G, Karachalios T, Stamos KG (2000) Epidemiology, demographics, and natural history of congenital hip disease in adults. Orthopedics 23:823–827Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA (2008) Mean 20-year followup of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1633–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goker B, Sancak A, Haznedaroglu S (2005) Radiographic hip osteoarthritis and acetabular dysplasia in Turkish men and women. Rheumatol Int 25:419–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reijman M, Hazes JMW, Pols HAP, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA (2005) Acetabular dysplasia predicts incident osteoarthritis of the hip: the Rotterdam study. Arthritis Rheum 52:787–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hasegawa Y, Iwata H, Mizuno M, Genda E, Sato S, Miura T (1992) The natural course of osteoarthritis of the hip due to subluxation or acetabular dysplasia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 111:187–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scoles PV, Boyd A, Jones PK (1987) Roentgenographic parameters of the normal infant hip. J Pediatr Orthop 7:656–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Heyman CH, Herndon CH (1950) Legg–Perthes disease; a method for the measurement of the roentgenographic result. J Bone Joint Surg Am 32:767–778Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wiig O, Terjesen T, Svenningsen S (2002) Inter-observer reliability of radiographic classifications and measurements in the assessment of Perthes’ disease. Acta Ortop Scand 73:523–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eklöf O, Ringertz H, Samuelsson L (1988) The percentage of migration as indicator of femoral head position. Acta Radiol 29:363–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EPOS 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orthopaedic DepartmentRikshospitalet, Oslo University HospitalOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations