Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Expandable endoprosthesis for limb-sparing surgery in children: long-term results

  • Original Clinical Article
  • Published:
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics

Abstract

Purpose

Most children today with bone sarcomas undergo limb-sparing surgery. When treating children younger than 12 years of age, the result is significant limb length discrepancy (LLD). One of the solutions is the use of an expandable endoprosthesis.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 38 skeletally immature patients with bone sarcoma of the lower limb in whom different types of expandable endoprostheses were used from January 1988 to December 2005 were included. All patients were under the age of 14 years. There were 26 osteosarcoma and 12 Ewing’s sarcomas. The data collected included the tumor characteristics, the surgical and other treatment modalities, complications and their treatment, and the final LLD and functional results.

Results

Fifty-five percent of the patients survived and had a mean follow-up of 113 months. All survivors reached skeletal maturity at the time of last follow-up. Seventy-one percent of the survivors had satisfactory function and 29% had a poor result. There were three secondary amputations due to local recurrence. Complications were documented in 58% of patients; the most common was infection that was diagnosed 56 times (primary 16% and secondary 84%). A significant correlation was found between function and final LLD (greater than 5 cm = inferior function), the number of complications, and the number of surgical procedures performed other than prosthesis elongation. The younger the patient was at definitive surgery, the shorter the time it took for the prosthesis to fail.

Conclusion

In order to improve results, the number of operations must be reduced. This can be achieved by the use of novel non-invasive expandable endoprostheses or biological reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DiCaprio MR, Friedlaender GE (2003) Malignant bone tumors: limb sparing versus amputation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11:25–37

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dominkus M, Krepler P, Schwameis E, Windhager R, Kotz R (2001) Growth prediction in extendable tumor prostheses in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 390:212–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cool WP, Carter SR, Grimer RJ, Tillman RM, Walker PS (1997) Growth after extendible endoprosthetic replacement of the distal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:938–942

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis VO (2005) Limb salvage in the skeletally immature patient. Curr Oncol Rep 7:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Malawer M (1985) Surgical technique and results of limb sparing surgery for high grade bone sarcomas of the knee and shoulder. Orthopedics 8:597–607

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grimer RJ (2005) Surgical options for children with osteosarcoma. Lancet Oncol 6:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Unwin PS, Walker PS (1996) Extendible endoprostheses for the skeletally immature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 322:179–193

    Google Scholar 

  8. Letson GD, D’Amato G, Windham TC, Muro-Cacho CA (2003) Extendable prostheses for the treatment of malignant bone tumors in growing children. Curr Opin Orthop 14:413–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Futani H, Minamizaki T, Nishimoto Y, Abe S, Yabe H, Ueda T (2006) Long-term follow-up after limb salvage in skeletally immature children with a primary malignant tumor of the distal end of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:595–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ (1993) A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:241–246

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frieden RA, Ryniker D, Kenan S, Lewis MM (1993) Assessment of patient function after limb-sparing surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:38–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1953) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA (1980) A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 153:106–120

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bacci G, Ferrari S, Mercuri M, Longhi A, Capanna R, Tienghi A, Brach del Prever A, Comandone A, Cesari M, Bernini G, Picci P (1998) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for extremity osteosarcoma—preliminary results of the Rizzoli’s 4th study. Acta Oncol 37:41–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Keohan ML, Taub RN (1997) Chemotherapy for advanced sarcoma: therapeutic decisions and modalities. Semin Oncol 24:572–579

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bramwell VHC (1997) The role of chemotherapy in the management of non-metastatic operable extremity osteosarcoma. Semin Oncol 24:561–571

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schindler OS, Cannon SR, Briggs TW, Blunn GW (1997) Stanmore custom-made extendible distal femoral replacements. Clinical experience in children with primary malignant bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:927–937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Belthur MV, Grimer RJ, Suneja R, Carter SR, Tillman RM (2003) Extensible endoprostheses for bone tumors of the proximal femur in children. J Pediatr Orthop 23:230–235

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schiller C, Windhager R, Fellinger EJ, Salzer-Kuntschik M, Kaider A, Kotz R (1995) Extendable tumour endoprostheses for the leg in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:608–614

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Neel MD, Letson GD (2001) Modular endoprostheses for children with malignant bone tumors. Cancer Control 8:344–348

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Eckardt JJ, Kabo JM, Kelley CM, Ward WG Sr, Asavamongkolkul A, Wirganowicz PZ, Yang RS, Eilber FR (2000) Expandable endoprosthesis reconstruction in skeletally immature patients with tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 373:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baumgart R, Hinterwimmer S, Krammer M, Muensterer O, Mutschler W (2005) The bioexpandable prosthesis: a new perspective after resection of malignant bone tumors in children. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 27:452–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tillman RM, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Cool WP, Sneath RS (1997) Growing endoprostheses for primary malignant bone tumors. Semin Surg Oncol 13:41–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Simon MA, Aschliman MA, Thomas N, Mankin HJ (1986) Limb-salvage treatment versus amputation for osteosarcoma of the distal end of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:1331–1337

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ewald A, Glückermann SK, Thull R, Gbureck U (2006) Antimicrobial titanium/silver PVD coatings on titanium. Biomed Eng Online 5:22

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isaac Meller.

About this article

Cite this article

Dotan, A., Dadia, S., Bickels, J. et al. Expandable endoprosthesis for limb-sparing surgery in children: long-term results. J Child Orthop 4, 391–400 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-010-0270-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-010-0270-x

Keywords

Navigation