Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Short-term experience with Ponseti casting and the Achilles tenotomy method for clubfeet treatment in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita

  • Original Clinical Article
  • Published:
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics

Abstract

Purpose

This study presents our experience with the Ponseti method of manipulation and casting followed by Achilles tenotomy (AT) in children with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC).

Methods

Five children (ten feet) were followed for at least 24 months after the AT and are the cohort for this study. Their mean age at follow-up was 38.4 months (26 to 48 months), and the average follow-up period was 35.8 months (24–44 months). Treatment was begun within the first months of life. The AT to correct rigid equinus was performed at a mean of 14.4 weeks of life, after 7–10 cast changes (mean 8.4). Clinical criteria by Niki et al. and standard standing AP and lateral radiographs were analyzed for final evaluation. Efficacy of Ponseti casting and AT tenotomy was assessed according to the amount and continuance of the achieved correction.

Results

Seven feet had clinically satisfactory results. Among the three unsatisfactory feet, there were two (one child) with rocker-bottom pseudocorrections after repeated bilateral AT and one recurrent clubfoot (one child). Six feet required soft tissue releases at 3, 12 and 21 months after the AT due to recurrence of moderate equinus and adductus. Three feet (two children) underwent repeat AT at 10 and 15 months after the primary procedure. The mean interval between initial AT and redo surgical procedures was 11.8 months (range 3–21 months). Two feet (20%) remained without significant deformity after AT.

Conclusion

Clubfoot in AMC responds initially to the Ponseti method of casting, and deformity may be corrected or diminished. In some children, more extensive surgical treatment can be avoided and in others, delayed. Despite the need for additional surgical intervention, the Ponseti method of casting and AT does seem to be an alternative for initial treatment in children with AMC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sodergard J, Ryoppy S (1994) Foot deformities in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. J Pediatr Orthop 14(6):768–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Guidera KJ, Drennan JC (1985) Foot and ankle deformities in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Clin Orthop Relat Res 194:93–98

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein RM (2002) Arthrogryposis and amyoplasia. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 10(6):417–424

    Google Scholar 

  4. Widmann RF, Do TT, Burke SW (2005) Radical soft-tissue release of the arthrogrypotic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B 14(2):111–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang CH, Huang SC (1997) Surgical treatment of clubfoot deformity in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. J Formos Med Assoc 96(1):30–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Niki H, Staheli LT, Mosca VS (1997) Management of clubfoot deformity in amyoplasia. J Pediatr Orthop 17(6):803–807. doi:10.1097/00004694-199711000-00020

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cassis N, Capdevila R (2000) Talectomy for clubfoot in arthrogryposis. J Pediatr Orthop 20(5):652–655. doi:10.1097/00004694-200009000-00020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lloyd-Roberts CG, Lettin AWF (1970) Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. J Bone Joint Surg Br 52:494–508

    Google Scholar 

  9. Letts M, Davidson D (1999) The role of bilateral talectomy in the management of bilateral rigid clubfeet. Am J Orthop 28(2):106–110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Spires TD, Gross RH, Low W, Barringer W (1984) Management of the resistant myelodysplastic or arthrogrypotic clubfoot with the Verberely–Ogston procedure. J Pediatr Orthop 4(6):705–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gross RH (1985) The role of the Verberely–Ogston procedure in the management of the arthrogrypotic foot. Clin Orthop Relat Res 194:99–103

    Google Scholar 

  12. Solund K, Sonne-Holm S, Kjolbye JE (1991) Talectomy for equinovarus deformity in arthrogryposis. A 13 (2–20) year review of 17 feet. Acta Orthop Scand 62(4):372–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ponseti IV, Smoley EN (1963) Congenital clubfoot: the results of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 45A:2261–2275

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ponseti IV, Zhivkov M, Davis N, Sinclair M, Dobbs MB, Morcuende JA (2006) Treatment of the complex idiopathic clubfoot. Clin Orthop Relat Res 451:171–176. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000224062.39990.48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dobbs MB, Rudzki JR, Purcell DB, Walton T, Porter KR, Gurnett CA (2004) Factors predictive of outcome after use of the Ponseti method for the treatment for idiopathic clubfeet. J Bone J Surg Am 86 A-(1):22–27

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hall JG (1997) Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: etiology, genetics, classification, diagnostic approach, and general aspects. J Pediatr Orthop B 6:159–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dimeglio A, Bensahel H, Souchet P, Mazeau P, Bonnet F (1995) Classification of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B 4:129–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dyer PJ, Davis N (2006) The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(8):1082–1084. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88B8.17482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fripp AT, Shaw NE (1967) Clubfoot. E and S Livingstone, Edinburgh and London

  20. Turco VJ (1981) Clubfoot. Current Problems in Orthopaedics. Churchill Livingstone

  21. Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, Ponseti IV (2004) Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics 113(2):376–380. doi:10.1542/peds.113.2.376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gravev AM, Boal DK, Wallach DM, Segal LS (2001) Metaphyseal fractures mimicking abuse during treatment for clubfoot. Pediatr Radiol 31(8):559–563. doi:10.1007/s002470100497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thacker MM, Scher DM, Sala DA, van Bosse HJ, Feldman DS, Lehman WB (2005) Use of the foot abduction orthosis following Ponseti casts: is it essential? J Pediatr Orthop 25(2):225–228. doi:10.1097/01.bpo.0000150814.56790.f9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen RC, Gordon JE, Luhmann SJ, Shoenecker PL, Dobbs MB (2007) A new dynamic foot abduction orthosis for clubfoot treatment. J Pediatr Orthop 27(5):522–528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bensahel H, Kuo K, Duhaime M (2003) the International Clubfoot Study Group: Outcome evaluation of the treatment of clubfoot: the international language of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B 12(4):269–271. doi:10.1097/00009957-200307000-00006

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bartholomew Kowalczyk.

About this article

Cite this article

Kowalczyk, B., Lejman, T. Short-term experience with Ponseti casting and the Achilles tenotomy method for clubfeet treatment in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. J Child Orthop 2, 365–371 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-008-0122-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-008-0122-0

Keywords

Navigation