Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

4D Simulation Research in Construction: A Systematic Mapping Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a systematic literature review (SLR) of the referenced research on 4D simulation in the construction industry. It uses the community structure method and modularity optimization techniques to propose a mapping of the research efforts dedicated to 4D simulation in construction. A total of 674 normalized keywords from 386 publications are analyzed, providing a new perspective of the keywords’ co-occurrences, clusters and communities. The evolution of the terminology over time and the communities of authors addressing this domain are also analyzed. The analysis of the keywords identifies the relationships between some big players (i.e., “Building information modeling”, “4D CAD”, “Virtual design and construction”, “Scheduling”, “Simulation”, “Critical path method” and “Software engineering”); each of these keywords leading a specific community, with a total of seven communities identified and analyzed. The research provides a new perspective on the main subjects of interest. Amongst other findings, the analysis of the evolution of the terminology shows how the use of the “4D CAD” keyword started declining around 2014 with the rise of the “4D BIM” keyword. Regarding the analysis of the authors’ communities, the total number of authors is 721, with a total of 1127 links, showing that while multiple authors have been working on 4D-related subjects, only a few communities of authors account for most of the activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Sacks R, Eastman C, Ghang L, Teicholz P (2018) BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, designers, engineers, contractors, and facility managers, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Boton C, Forgues D (2017) The need for a new systemic approach to study collaboration in the construction industry. Procedia Eng 196:1043–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kreider R, Messner J, Dubler C (2010) Determining the frequency and impact of applying BIM for different purposes on building projects. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on innovation in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC), 2010, pp 1–10

  4. Zhang C, Zayed T, Hijazi W, Alkass S (2016) Quantitative assessment of building constructability using BIM and 4D simulation. Open J Civ Eng 06:442–461. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2016.63037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hartmann T, Fischer M (2007) Supporting the constructability review with 3D/4D models. Build Res Inf 35:70–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210600942218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang H, Lho B, Kim J (2004) Development of web-based interactive 4D block tower model for construction planning and scheduling education. In: Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education annual conference and exposition, 2004, Salt Lake City, Utah, pp 1–10

  7. Sampaio AZ, Henriques PG, Martins OP (2010) Virtual reality technology used in civil engineering education. Open Virtual Real J 2:18–25. https://doi.org/10.2174/1875323X01002010018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang L, Messner JI, Leicht R (2007) Assessment of 4D modeling for schedule visualization in construction engineering education. In: 24th CIB W78 conference, bridging ITC knowledge to work, 2007, Maribor, Slovenia, pp 737–742

  9. Kubicki S, Boton C (2011) 4D-based teaching of high-rise structural principles. In: Proceedings of the CIB W78–W102 2011 international conference, 2011, Sophia Antipolis

  10. Akinci B, Fischen M, Levitt R, Carlson R (2002) Formalization and automation of time–space conflict analysis. J Comput Civ Eng 16:124–134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2002)16:2(124)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yabuki N, Shitani T (2005) A management system for cut and fill earthworks based on 4D CAD and EVMS. In: Proceedings of computing in civil engineering conference, 2005, Cancun, Mexico, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/40794(179)152

  12. Shah RK, Dawood N, Castro S (2008) Automatic generation of progress profiles for earthwork operations using 4D visualisation model. Electron J Inf Technol Constr 13:491–506

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kubicki S, Boton C (2014) IT barometer survey in Luxembourg: first results to understand IT innovation in construction sector. In: Computing in civil and building engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, Orlando, pp 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413616.023

  14. Boton C, Kubicki S, Halin G (2013) Designing adapted visualization for collaborative 4D applications. Autom Constr 36:152–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kassem M, Brogden T, Dawood N (2012) BIM and 4D planning: a holistic study of the barriers and drivers to widespread adoption. J Constr Eng Proj Manag 2:1–10. https://doi.org/10.6106/jcepm.2012.2.4.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gledson BJ, Greenwood D (2017) The adoption of 4D BIM in the UK construction industry: an innovation diffusion approach. Eng Constr Archit Manag 24:950–967. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2016-0066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Collier E, Fischer M (1995) Four-dimensional modeling in design and construction. CIFE Technical Report #101. CIFE, Stanford

  18. Boton C (2018) Supporting constructability analysis meetings with Immersive Virtual Reality-based collaborative BIM 4D simulation. Autom Constr 96:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.08.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Boton C, Halin G, Kubicki S (2014) Characterizing collaborative 4D use contexts to improve interaction mechanisms design. In: Proceedings of CIB W78 2014, 2014, pp 1–8

  20. Dawood N, Sikka SS (2008) Measuring the effectiveness of 4D planning as a valuable communication tool. Electron J Inf Technol Constr 13:620–636

    Google Scholar 

  21. Staub-French S, Khanzode A (2007) 3D and 4D modeling for design and construction coordination: issues and lessons learned. Electron J Inf Technol Constr 12:381–407

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mahalingam A, Kashyap R, Mahajan C (2010) An evaluation of the applicability of 4D CAD on construction projects. Autom Constr 19:148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.11.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Akinci B, Fischer M, Levitt R (2000) Formalization and automation of time–space conflict analysis. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2002)16:2(124)

  24. Heesom D, Mahdjoubi L (2004) Trends of 4D CAD applications for construction planning. Constr Manag Econ 22:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619042000201376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Halin G, Kubicki S, Boton C, Zignale D (2011) From collaborative business practices to user’s adapted visualization services: towards a usage-centered method dedicated to the AEC sector. In: Luo Y (ed) Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6874. Springer, Berlin, pp 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23734-8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Boton C (2013) Conception de vues métiers dans les collecticiels orientés service: Vers des multi-vues adaptées pour la simulation collaborative 4D/nD de la construction

  27. Sacks R, Eastman C, Lee G, Teicholz P (2018) BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, designers, engineers, contractors, and facility managers. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Musa AM, Abanda FH, Oti AH, Tah JHM, Boton C (2016) The potential of 4D modelling software systems for risk management in construction projects. In: CIB world building congress, 2016, Tampere, Finland, pp 988–999

  29. Kassem M, Dawood N, Chavada R (2015) Construction workspace management within an Industry Foundation Class-Compliant 4D tool. Autom Constr 52:42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dietz AGH, Litle WA (1976) Education for construction. J Constr Div 102:347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Clayton M (2002) Virtual construction of architecture using 3D CAD and simulation. Autom Constr 11:227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(00)00100-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Elgohari T (n.d.) General comparison between BIM 4D softwares. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/general-comparison-between-bim-4d-software-tamer-mohammed/. Accessed 27 Sep 2022

  33. 4D Construction Group (2020) 4D solutions review. 4D Construction Group

  34. Di Donato D, Abita M (2019) Low-cost 4D BIM modelling a comparison between FreeCAD and commercial software. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci ISPRS Arch 42:107–114. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W17-107-2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nechyporchuk Y, Baskova R (2021) The level of detail for 4D BIM modeling. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 1209:012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1209/1/012002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ivson P, Nascimento D, Celes W, Barbosa SDJ (2018) CasCADe: a novel 4D visualization system for virtual construction planning. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 24:687–697. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2745105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Trebbe M, Hartmann T, Dorée A (2015) 4D CAD models to support the coordination of construction activities between contractors. Autom Constr 49:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fischer M, Stone M, Liston K, Kunz J, Singhal V (2002) Multi-stakeholder collaboration: the CIFE iRoom. In: International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction. CIB w78 conference, 2002. Aarhus School of Architecture, pp 12–14

  39. Waly AF, Thabet WY (2002) A Virtual Construction Environment for preconstruction planning. Autom Constr 12:139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(02)00047-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ku K, Mahabaleshwarkar PS (2011) Building interactive modeling for construction education in virtual worlds. Electron J Inf Technol Constr 16:189–208

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fernando T, Wu K-C, Bassanino M (2013) Designing a novel virtual collaborative environment to support collaboration in design review meetings. J Inf Technol Constr 18:372–396

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wu TH, Wu F, Liang CJ, Li YF, Tseng CM, Kang SC (2017) A virtual reality tool for training in global engineering collaboration. Univers Access Inf Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0594-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sampaio AZ, Martins OP (2014) The application of virtual reality technology in the construction of bridge: the cantilever and incremental launching methods. Autom Constr 37:58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cruz TV (2018) Virtual reality in the architecture, engineering and construction industry. Proposal of an interactive collaboration application. Master thesis, Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto. https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/111295/2/258986.pdf, Accessed 15 Mar 2021

  45. Getuli V, Capone P, Bruttini A, Isaac S (2020) BIM-based immersive Virtual Reality for construction workspace planning: a safety-oriented approach. Autom Constr 114:103160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lucas J (2020) Rapid development of virtual reality based construction sequence simulations: a case study. J Inf Technol Constr 25:72–86. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2020.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wolfartsberger J (2019) Analyzing the potential of Virtual Reality for engineering design review. Autom Constr 104:27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bourlon S, Boton C (2019) Automating the integration of 4D models in game engines for a virtual reality-based construction simulation. In: Cooperative design, visualization, and engineering. CDVE 2019. Lecture notes in computer science, 2019, vol 11792. Springer, pp 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30949-7_14

  49. Guevremont M, Hammad A (2018) Defining levels of development for 4D simulation of major capital construction projects. In: Advances in informatics and computing in civil and construction engineering—proceedings of the 35th CIB W78 2018 conference: IT in design, construction, and management, 2018. Springer, pp 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00220-6_10

  50. Boton C, Kubicki S, Halin G (2015) The challenge of level of development in 4D/BIM simulation across AEC project lifecycle. A case study. Procedia Eng 123:59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Butkovic B, Heesom D (n.d.) Towards a framework for multi-LOD 4D BIM simulations. http://usir.salford.ac.uk/44058/7/IRC2017_Proceedings_12102017_optimised.pdf#page=579. Accessed 27 June 2018

  52. Park J, Cai H, Perissin D (2018) Bringing information to the field: automated photo registration and 4D BIM. J Comput Civ Eng 32:04017084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kropp C, Koch C, König M (2018) Interior construction state recognition with 4D BIM registered image sequences. Autom Constr 86:11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Omar H, Mahdjoubi L, Kheder G (2018) Towards an automated photogrammetry-based approach for monitoring and controlling construction site activities. Comput Ind 98:172–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Hu D, Mohamed Y, Taghaddos H, Hermann UR (2017) A simulation-based method for effective workface planning of industrial construction projects. Constr Manag Econ 36:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2017.1390241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. He Q, Wang G, Luo L, Shi Q, Xie J, Meng X (2016) Mapping the managerial areas of Building Information Modeling (BIM) using scientometric analysis. Int J Proj Manag 35:670–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Li X, Wu P, Shen GQ, Wang X, Teng Y (2017) Mapping the knowledge domains of Building Information Modeling (BIM): a bibliometric approach. Autom Constr 84:195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Oraee M, Hosseini MR, Papadonikolaki E, Palliyaguru R, Arashpour M (2017) Collaboration in BIM-based construction networks: a bibliometric-qualitative literature review. Int J Proj Manag 35:1288–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Santos R, Costa AA, Grilo A (2017) Bibliometric analysis and review of Building Information Modelling literature published between 2005 and 2015. Autom Constr 80:118–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lemaire C, Rivest L, Boton C, Danjou C, Braesch C, Nyffenegger F (2019) Analyzing BIM topics and clusters through ten years of scientific publications. J Inf Technol Constr 24:273–298

    Google Scholar 

  61. Pezeshki Z, Ivari SAS (2018) Applications of BIM: a brief review and future outline. Arch Comput Methods Eng 25:273–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-016-9204-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Guo B, Feng T (2019) Mapping knowledge domains of integration in BIM-based construction networks: a systematic mixed-method review. Adv Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5161579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Martínez-Aires MD, López-Alonso M, Martínez-Rojas M (2018) Building information modeling and safety management: a systematic review. Saf Sci 101:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Jamil AHA, Fathi MS (2018) Contractual challenges for BIM-based construction projects: a systematic review. Built Environ Proj Asset Manag 8:372–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-12-2017-0131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ganbat T, Chong HY, Liao PC, Lee CY (2018) A cross-systematic review of addressing risks in building information modelling-enabled international construction projects. Arch Comput Methods Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-018-9265-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Vigneault M-A, Boton C, Chong H-Y, Cooper-Cooke B (2020) An innovative framework of 5D BIM solutions for construction cost management: a systematic review. Arch Comput Methods Eng 27:1013–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09341-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ivson P, Moreira A, Queiroz F, Santos W, Celes W (2019) A systematic review of visualization in building information modeling. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph X:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2019.2907583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Charef R, Alaka H, Emmitt S (2018) Beyond the third dimension of BIM: a systematic review of literature and assessment of professional views. J Build Eng 19:242–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.04.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Wang H, Pan Y, Luo X (2019) Integration of BIM and GIS in sustainable built environment: a review and bibliometric analysis. Autom Constr 103:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Lee CY, Chong HY, Wang X (2018) Streamlining digital modeling and building information modelling (BIM) uses for the oil and gas projects. Arch Comput Methods Eng 25:349–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-016-9201-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Pérez CT, Fernandes LLA, Costa DB (2016) A literature review on 4D BIM for logistics operations and workspace management. In: IGLC 2016—24th annual conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 2016, pp 53–62

  72. Desgagné-Lebeuf A, Lehoux N, Beauregard R, Desgagné-Lebeuf G (2019) Computer-assisted scheduling tools in the construction industry: a systematic literature review. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52:1843–1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Borges MLAE, Cavalcanti de Souza I, Melo RSS, Giesta JP (2018) 4D building information modelling: a systematic mapping study. In: ISARC 2018—35th international symposium on automation and robotics in construction and International AEC/FM Hackathon: the future of building things, 2018. https://doi.org/10.22260/isarc2018/0070

  74. Rivest L, Braesch C, Nyffenegger F, Danjou C, Maranzana N, Segonds F (2020) Identifying PLM themes and clusters from a decade of research literature. Int J Prod Lifecycle Manag 12:81–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A (2016) The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics 106:213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M (2009) Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: Proceedings of the third international ICWSM conference, 2009, pp 361–362

  77. Jacomy M, Venturini T, Heymann S, Bastian M (2014) ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS ONE 9:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Newman MEJ (2006) Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:8577–8582. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601602103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Guimerà R, Amaral LAN (2005) Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature 433:895–900. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Danon L, Díaz-Guilera A, Duch J, Arenas A (2005) Comparing community structure identification. J Stat Mech Theory Exp. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2005/09/P09008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ecole de technologie superieure, 1100, rue Notre-Dame Ouest, Montreal, QC, H3C 1K3, Canada

    Conrad Boton, Louis Rivest & Oussama Ghnaya

  2. Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, 5 avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, 4362, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

    Sylvain Kubicki

Authors
  1. Conrad Boton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Louis Rivest
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sylvain Kubicki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Oussama Ghnaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Conrad Boton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boton, C., Rivest, L., Kubicki, S. et al. 4D Simulation Research in Construction: A Systematic Mapping Study. Arch Computat Methods Eng 30, 2451–2472 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09873-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09873-x

Search

Navigation