Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 871–874 | Cite as

Artificial rainfall increases herbivory on an externally defended forb

Original Paper

Abstract

Plants have a variety of herbivore resistance traits, including a diverse array of chemicals, either inside plant tissues or on plant surfaces. External chemical defenses are common and widespread, though understudied as a class. One potential selective force on these defenses is their potential for abiotic dislodgement given their exposed position. I tested whether abiotic removal (artificial rainfall) leads to increased herbivory in the annual chenopod Atriplex rosea. This plant, like other chenopods, has specialized secretory trichomes, which secrete water-soluble herbivore resistance compounds onto the plant’s surfaces. Consistent with this hypothesis, I found significantly greater chewing herbivory in plants which received artificial rainfall compared to no-rainfall controls and a below-leaf water control. This simple experiment demonstrates that abiotic factors can directly change the efficacy of a resistance trait.

Keywords

External chemical defenses Herbivore resistance Salt bladders Atriplex Diabrotica 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Cathy Koehler and Paul Aigner supported this work at the McLaughlin reserve, as did the staff of Homestake Mining Company. Charley Eiseman identified Monoxia angularis. Rick Karban read and gave insightful comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by the Jastro-Shields fund through the graduate group in ecology at UC Davis.

References

  1. Baldwin BC, Goldman D, Keil D, Patterson R, Rosatti T, Wilken D (2012) The Jepson manual: vascular plants of California, 2nd edn. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  2. Dell B, McComb A (1979) Plant resins—their formation, secretion and possible functions. Adv Bot Res 6:277–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dussourd DE, Denno RF (1991) Deactivation of plant defense—correspondence between insect behaviour and secretory canal architecture. Ecology 72:1383–1396. doi: 10.2307/1941110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eiseman CS (2014) New host records and other notes on North American leaf-mining Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera). Coleopt Bull 68:351–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elle E, Hare JD (2000) No benefit of glandular trichome production in natural populations of Datura wrightii? Oecologia 123(1):57–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Elle E, van Dam N, Hare J (1999) Cost of glandular trichomes, a “resistance” character in Datura wrightii Regel (Solanaceae). Evolution (NY) 53:22–35Google Scholar
  7. Gimsing AL, Bælum J, Dayan FE et al (2009) Mineralization of the allelochemical sorgoleone in soil. Chemosphere 76:1041–1047. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.04.048 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gonzalez-Coloma A, Wisdom CS, Rundel PW (1988) Ozone impact on the antioxidant nordihydroguaiaretic acid content in the external leaf resin of Larrea tridentata. Biochem Syst Ecol 16:59–64. doi: 10.1016/0305-1978(88)90119-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gonzalez-Coloma A, Wisdom CS, Rundel PW (1990) Compound interactions effects of plant antioxidants in combination with carbaryl on performance of Trichoplusia ni (Cabbage Looper). J Chem Ecol 16:887–899. doi: 10.1007/BF01016498 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Karban R, Myers J (1989) Induced plant responses to herbivory. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kurashige N, Agrawal A (2005) Phenotypic plasticity to light competition and herbivory in Chenopodium album (Chenopodiaceae). Am J Bot 92:21–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lincoln DE, Mooney HA (1984) Herbivory on Diplacus aurantiacus shrubs in sun and shade. Oecologia 64:173–176. doi: 10.1007/BF00376867 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lopresti EF (2013) Chenopod salt bladders deter insect herbivores. Oecologia 174:921–930. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2827-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. LoPresti EF (2016) Chemicals on plant surfaces as a heretofore unrecognized, but ecologically informative, class for investigations into plant defence. Biol Rev 91:1102–1117. doi: 10.1111/brv.12212 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Martens SN, Boyd RS (1994) The ecological significance of nickel hyperaccumulation—a plant chemical defense. Oecologia 98:379–384. doi: 10.1007/bf00324227 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Osmond C, Bjorkman O, Anderson D (1980) Physiological processes in ecology: towards a synthesis with Atriplex. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Palmer TM, Brody AK (2007) Mutualism as reciprocal exploitation: african plant–ants defend foliar but not reproductive structures. Ecology 88:3004–3011. doi: 10.1890/07-0133.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Raguse CA, Young JA, Evans RE (1977) Germination of California annual range plants in response to a summer rain. Agron J 69:327–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shomer-Ilan A, Nissenbaum A, Waisel Y (1981) Photosynthetic pathways and the ecological distribution of the Chenopodiaceae in Israel. Oecologia 48:244–248. doi: 10.1007/BF00347970 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Thompson JN (2005) The geographic mosaic of coevolution. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Dam NM, Hare DJ (1998) Differences in distribution and performance of two sap-sucking herbivores on glandular and non-glandular Datura wrightii. Ecol Entomol 23:22–32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.1998.00110.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department EntomologyUC DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations