Advertisement

Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 273–282 | Cite as

Jasmonate-dependent plant defenses mediate soybean thrips and soybean aphid performance on soybean

  • Patrick Selig
  • Stacy Keough
  • Vamsi J. Nalam
  • Punya NachappaEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Insect herbivores from different feeding guilds induce different signaling pathways in plants. In this study, we examined the effects of salicylic acid (SA)- and jasmonic acid (JA)-mediated defenses on performance of insect herbivores from two different feeding guilds: cell-content feeders, soybean thrips and phloem feeders, soybean aphids. We used a combination of RT-qPCR analysis and elicitor-induced plant resistance to determine induction of SA and JA signaling pathways and the impact on herbivore performance. In the early interaction between the host plant and the two herbivores, SA and JA signaling seems to occur simultaneously. But overall, soybean thrips induced JA-related marker genes, whereas soybean aphids increased SA and ABA-related marker genes over a 24-h period. Populations of both soybean thrips and soybean aphids were reduced (47 and 25 %, respectively) in methyl jasmonate (MeJA)-pretreated soybean plants. SA treatment has no effect on either herbivore performance. A combination pretreatment of SA and MeJA did not impact soybean thrips population but reduced soybean aphid numbers which was comparable with MeJA treatment. Our data suggest that SA–JA antagonism could be responsible for the effect of hormone pretreatment on thrips performance, but not on aphid performance. By linking plant defense gene expression and elicitor-induced resistance, we were able to pinpoint the role for JA signaling pathway in resistance to two herbivores from different feeding guilds.

Keywords

Salicylic acid Jasmonic acid Abscisic acid Soybean thrips Soybean aphids 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Grants from the Indiana Academy of Sciences and Indiana Soybean Alliance. We thank Jenna Davidson, Lee Danels and Dominic Snowball for their help with the insect performance assays. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their feedback that significantly improved the manuscript.

Supplementary material

11829_2016_9437_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (27 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 1 Expression of salicylate-responsive PR1 and jasmonate-responsive JAR1 in plants treated with SA or MeJA. Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed on RNA extracted from leaves of soybean plants 24 h after they were treated with 0.1 or 0.5 mM salicylic acid and 0.5 or 1.5 mM MeJA. RNA was also collected from plants that were treated with water as a control (C). Each lane on the gel image represents pooled RNA extracted from leaf tissue collected from three individual plants. Expression of soybean FBOX gene provided the control for RT-PCR (JPEG 27 kb)

References

  1. Abe H, Ohnishi J, Narusaka M, Seo S, Narusaka Y, Tsuda S, Kobayashi M (2008) Function of jasmonate in response and tolerance of Arabidopsis to thrips feeding. Plant Cell Physiol 49:68–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abe H et al (2009) Jasmonate-dependent plant defense restricts thrips performance and preference. BMC Plant Biol 9:97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Accamando A, Cronin J (2012) Costs and benefits of jasmonic acid induced responses in soybean. Environ Entomol 41:551–561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ali JG, Agrawal AA (2012) Specialist versus generalist insect herbivores and plant defense. Trends Plant Sci 17:293–302CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bansal R, Mittapelly P, Cassone BJ, Mamidala P, Redinbaugh MG, Michel A (2015) Recommended reference genes for quantitative PCR analysis in soybean have variable stabilities during diverse biotic stresses. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134890 Google Scholar
  6. Bari R, Jones JDG (2009) Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol Biol 69:473–488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boughton AJ, Hoover K, Felton GW (2005) Methyl jasmonate application induces increased densities of glandular trichomes on tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. J Chem Ecol 31:2211–2216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Broekgaarden C, Voorrips RE, Dicke M, Vosman B (2011) Transcriptional responses of Brassica nigra to feeding by specialist insects of different feeding guilds. Insect Sci 18:259–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2010.01368.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cao HH, Wang SH, Liu TX (2014) Jasmonate- and salicylate-induced defenses in wheat affect host preference and probing behavior but not performance of the grain aphid, Sitobion avenae. Insect Sci 21:47–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper WC, Jia L, Goggin FL (2004) Acquired and R-gene mediated resistance against the potato aphid in tomato. J Chem Ecol 30:2527–2542. doi: 10.1007/s10886-004-7948-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Duffey S (1986) Plant glandular trichomes: their partial role in defence against insects. In: Juniper B, Southwood R (eds) Insects and the plant surface. Edward Arnold, London, pp 151–172Google Scholar
  12. El-Wakeil NE, Volkmar C, Sallam AA (2010) Jasmonic acid induces resistance to economically important insect pests in winter wheat. Pest Manag Sci 66:549–554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ford KA et al (2010) Neonicotinoid insecticides induce salicylate-associated plant defense responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:17527–17532CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Foyer CH, Verrall SR, Hancock RD (2015) Systematic analysis of phloem-feeding insect-induced transcriptional reprogramming in Arabidopsis highlights common features and reveals distinct responses to specialist and generalist insects. J Exp Bot 66:495–512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Harwood JD, Desneux N, Yoo HJS, Rowley DL, Greenstone MH, Obrycki JJ (2007) Tracking the role of alternative prey in soybean aphid predation by Orius insidiosus: a molecular approach. Mol Ecol 16:4390–4400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Heidel-Fischer HM, Musser RO, Vogel H (2014) Plant transcriptomic responses to herbivory. Annu Plant Rev Insect Plant Interact 47:155–196. doi: 10.1002/9781118829783.ch5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hodgson E, McCornack B, Tilmon K, Knodel J (2012) Management recommendations for soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in the United States. J Integr Pest Manag 3:E1–E10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howe GA, Jander G (2008) Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:41–66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Huckaba RM, Coble HD, Van Duyn JW (1988) Joint effects of acifluorfen applications and soybean thrips (Sericothrips variabilis) feeding on soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci 36:667–670Google Scholar
  20. Irwin ME, Yeargan KV, Marston NL (1979) Spatial and seasonal patterns of phytophagous thrips in soybean fields with comments on sampling techniques. Environ Entomol 8:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2002) Plant responses to insect herbivory: the emerging molecular analysis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:299–328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein AT et al (2015) Investigation of the chemical interface in the soybean-aphid and rice-bacteria interactions using MALDI-mass spectrometry imaging. Anal Chem 87:5294–5301Google Scholar
  23. Le DT, Aldrich DL, Valliyodan B, Watanabe Y, Ha CV, Nishiyama R et al (2012) Evaluation of candidate reference genes for normalization of quantitative RT-PCR in soybean tissues under various abiotic stress conditions. PLoS ONE 7:e46487Google Scholar
  24. Li Y, Zou J, Li M, Bilgin DD, Vodkin LO, Hartman GL, Clough SJ (2008) Soybean defense responses to the soybean aphid. New Phytol 179:185–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCΤ method. Methods 25:402–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mason HS, DeWald DB, Mullet JE (1993) Identification of a methyl jasmonate-responsive domain in the soybean vspB promoter. Plant Cell 5:241–251PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Mewis I, Appel HM, Hom A, Raina R, Schultz JC (2005) Major signaling pathways modulate arabidopsis glucosinolate accumulation and response to both phloem-feeding and chewing insects. Plant Physiol 138:1149–1162CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Momol M, Olson S, Funderburk J, Stavisky J, Marois J (2004) Integrated management of tomato spotted wilt on field-grown tomatoes. Plant Dis 88:882–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mueller AJ (1994) Soybean thrips. In: Higley LG, Boethel DJ (eds) Handbook of soybean pests. Entomological Society of America, Lanham, MDGoogle Scholar
  30. Nalam VJ et al (2015) Facilitation of Fusarium graminearum infection by 9-lipoxygenases in Arabidopsis and wheat. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 28:1142–1152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Novotny V et al (2010) Guild-specific patterns of species richness and host specialization in plant–herbivore food webs from a tropical forest. J Anim Ecol 79:1193–1203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pieterse CMJ, Leon-Reyes A, Van der Ent S, Van Wees SCM (2009) Networking by small-molecule hormones in plant immunity. Nat Chem Biol 5:308–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Prochaska TJ, Donze-Reiner T, Marchi-Werle L, Palmer NA, Hunt TE, Sarath G, Heng-Moss T (2015) Transcriptional responses of tolerant and susceptible soybeans to soybean aphid (Aphis glycines Matsumura) herbivory. Arthropod Plant Interact 9:347–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ragsdale DW, Landis DA, Brodeur J, Heimpel GE, Desneux N (2011) Ecology and management of the soybean aphid in North America. Annu Rev Entomol 56:375–399CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Reisig DD, Herbert DA, Malone S (2012) Impact of neonicotinoid seed treatments on thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and soybean yield in Virginia and North Carolina. J Econ Entomol 105:884–889CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Robert-Seilaniantz A, Grant M, Jones JD (2011) Hormone crosstalk in plant disease and defense: more than just jasmonate-salicylate antagonism. Annu Rev Phytopathol 49:317–343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Schoonhoven LM, Loon JJA, Dicke M (2005) Insect-plant biology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Stam JM, Kroes A, Li Y, Gols R, van Loon JJ, Poelman EH, Dicke M (2014) Plant interactions with multiple insect herbivores: from community to genes. Plant Biol 65:689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Studham ME, MacIntosh GC (2012) Phytohormone signaling pathway analysis method for comparing hormone responses in plant–pest interactions. BMC Res Notes 5:392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Studham ME, MacIntosh GC (2013) Multiple phytohormone signals control the transcriptional response to soybean aphid infestation in susceptible and resistant soybean plants. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 26:116–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Szczepaniec A, Raupp MJ, Parker RD, Kerns D, Eubanks MD (2013) Neonicotinoid insecticides alter induced defenses and increase susceptibility to spider mites in distantly related crop plants. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062620 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Tally A, Oostendorp M, Lawton K, Staub T, Bassy B (1999) Commercial development of elicitors of induced resistance to pathogens. In: Agarwal AA, Tuzun S, Bent E (eds) Induced plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores: biochemistry, ecology, and agriculture, APS Press, St. Paul, pp 357–369Google Scholar
  43. Thaler JS, Stout MJ, Karban R, Duffey SS (2001) Jasmonate-mediated induced plant resistance affects a community of herbivores. Ecol Entomol 26:312–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thaler JS, Agrawal AA, Halitschke R (2010) Salicylate-mediated interactions between pathogens and herbivores. Ecology 91:1075–1082. doi: 10.1890/08-2347.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Thaler JS, Humphrey PT, Whiteman NK (2012) Evolution of jasmonate and salicylate signal crosstalk. Trends Plant Sci 17:260–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Thompson GA, Goggin FL (2006) Transcriptomics and functional genomics of plant defence induction by phloem-feeding insects. J Exp Bot 57:755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Walling LL (2000) The myriad plant responses to herbivores. J Plant Growth Regul 19:195–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ward EW, Cahill DM, Bhattacharyya MK (1989) Abscisic acid suppression of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity and mRNA, and resistance of soybeans to Phytophthora megasperma f. sp. glycinea. Plant Physiol 91:23–27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu Y et al (2012) The Arabidopsis NPR1 protein is a receptor for the plant defense hormone salicylic acid. Cell Rep 1:639–647CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Zarate SI, Kempema LA, Walling LL (2007) Silverleaf whitefly induces salicylic acid defenses and suppresses effectual jasmonic acid defenses. Plant Physiol 143:866–875CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhou J, Tzanetakis IE (2013) Epidemiology of Soybean vein necrosis-associated virus. Phytopathology 103:966–971CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Selig
    • 1
  • Stacy Keough
    • 1
  • Vamsi J. Nalam
    • 1
  • Punya Nachappa
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Indiana University-Purdue University Fort WayneFort WayneUSA

Personalised recommendations