Skip to main content
Log in

Floral damage induces resistance to florivory in Impatiens capensis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many plants produce defense chemicals that are induced in response to damage. In spite of the tight links between floral tissue and plant reproduction, very little is known about whether floral defenses are induced in response to floral damage. We manipulated Impatiens capensis flowers to determine whether floral damage reduces subsequent florivory, whether it induces anthocyanins or condensed tannins in floral tissues, and whether responses are localized or systemic. We damaged one flower per plant at one of three damage levels (0, 30, or 60 % tissue removal), collected subsequent flowers at set time intervals and branch locations, and measured whole-plant florivory for 3 weeks following damage. We also observed a flower color polymorphism and analyzed responses separately for red- and yellow-flowered plants. Moderate damage to a single flower reduced subsequent whole-plant florivory, but heavy damage did not. Moderate damage to a focal flower also increased anthocyanins in subsequent flowers on the same branch of red-flowered plants, but decreased anthocyanins on parallel-branch flowers of yellow-flowered plants. Damage did not affect floral tannins. Because the reduction in florivory was systemic and induced anthocyanins were not consistently induced systemically, there may be other secondary compounds not measured in this study that were systemically induced, or effects of visual or olfactory cues of damage itself that reduced subsequent florivory. This is the first study demonstrating that damage to a single flower can reduce subsequent whole-plant florivory in the field, indicating that initial damage can have cascading effects on subsequent interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank W. Anthony, S. Cortez-Grieg, K. Henry, L. Tomaszewski, and A. Tomaszewski for their assistance in the field, Nancy Hansen and Hampshire Farm for allowing access to the study site, and the Adler lab and one anonymous reviewer for their comments on the manuscript. This project was supported by the National Research Initiative (NRI) Arthropod and Nematode Biology and Management Program of the USDA Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service (CSREES) Grant No. 2008-02346 and by the National Science Foundation NSF-DEB-0742923 and NSF-DEB-1258096. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or United States Department of Agriculture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn S. Adler.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Lars Chittka.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 172 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boyer, M.D.H., Soper Gorden, N.L., Barber, N.A. et al. Floral damage induces resistance to florivory in Impatiens capensis . Arthropod-Plant Interactions 10, 121–131 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-015-9411-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-015-9411-y

Keywords

Navigation