Advertisement

Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 93–98 | Cite as

Resource pulses of dead periodical cicadas increase the growth of American bellflower rosettes under competitive and non-competitive conditions

  • Louie H. YangEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This experiment investigates how pulsed nutrient resources interact with intraspecific competition to influence biomass production and nutrient use efficiency in the American bellflower (Campanulastrum americanum). The competitive environment of these plants was manipulated by growing plants alone or with neighboring conspecifics, and the occurrence of pulsed nutrient resources was manipulated through the addition of 17-year periodical cicada (Magicicada septendecim) carcasses in order to simulate naturally occurring pulsed resources in this system. The addition of cicada carcasses increased mean plant biomass by 61 % compared to non-supplemented plants, while competition decreased mean plant biomass by 44 % compared to plants grown without competition; these effects were additive. In comparison, nutrient use efficiency decreased in fertilized plants (cicada-supplemented plants showed 20 % greater foliage nitrogen concentrations compared to non-supplemented plants), but was not significantly affected by the plant’s competitive environment. In addition, cicada supplementation did not significantly increase the biomass asymmetry in competing pairs of plants. These results suggest that these plants increased their total nutrient uptake at a timescale commensurate with the pulsed increase in nutrient availability due to cicada carcass decomposition.

Keywords

Resource pulses Competition Nutrient use efficiency Foliage nitrogen Periodical cicadas (MagicicadaseptendecimAmerican bellflowers (Campanulastrum americanum

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank the Mountain Lake Biological Station and Blandy Experimental Farm at the University of Virginia for field site assistance. Thanks to David Carr, T’ai Roulston, and Rick Karban for assistance in the field, and Rick Karban, Tom Schoener, Kevin Rice, Jonathan Levine and Tabatha Bruce for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. This research was supported by the Center for Population Biology and Section of Evolution and Ecology at the University of California, Davis and the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program.

References

  1. Baskin JM, Baskin CC (1984) The ecological life-cycle of Campanula americana in north central Kentucky. Bull Torrey Bot Club 111:329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berendse F, Aerts R (1987) Nitrogen-use-efficiency: a biologically meaningful definition? Funct Ecol 1:293–296Google Scholar
  3. Birk EM, Vitousek PM (1986) Nitrogen availability and nitrogen use efficiency in loblolly pine stands. Ecology 67:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boutin S, Wauters LA, McAdam AG et al (2006) Anticipatory reproduction and population growth in seed predators. Science 314:1928–1930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapin FS (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen B, Wise DH (1999) Bottom-up limitation of predaceous arthropods in a detritus-based terrestrial food web. Ecology 80:761–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dybas HS, Davis DD (1962) A population census of seventeen-year periodical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada). Ecology 43:432–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galloway LF (2001a) The effect of maternal and paternal environments on seed characters in the herbaceous plant Campanula americana (Campanulaceae). Am J Bot 88:832–840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galloway LF (2001b) Parental environmental effects on life history in the herbaceous plant Campanula americana. Ecology 82:2781–2789Google Scholar
  10. Galloway LF, Etterson JR (2009) Plasticity to canopy shade in a monocarpic herb: within- and between-generation effects. New Phytol 182:1003–1012. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02803.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gebauer R, Schwinning S, Ehleringer J (2002) Interspecific competition and resource pulse utilization in a cold desert community. Ecology 83:2602–2616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gratton C, Denno RF (2003) Inter-year carryover effects of a nutrient pulse on Spartina plants, herbivores, and natural enemies. Ecology 84:2692–2707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harpole WS, Tilman D (2007) Grassland species loss resulting from reduced niche dimension. Nature 446:791–793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hodge A (2004) The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients. New Phytol 162:9–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoekman D, Dreyer J, Jackson RD et al (2011) Lake to land subsidies: experimental addition of aquatic insects increases terrestrial arthropod densities. Ecology 92:2063–2072. doi: 10.1890/11-0160.1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holt RD (2008) Theoretical perspectives on resource pulses. Ecology 89:671–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jankju-Borzelabad M, Griffiths H (2006) Competition for pulsed resources: an experimental study of establishment and coexistence for an arid-land grass. Oecologia 148:555–563. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0408-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karban R (1984) Opposite density effects of nymphal and adult mortality for periodical cicadas. Ecology 65:1656–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koenig WD, Liebhold AM (2003) Regional impacts of periodical cicadas on oak radial increment. Can J for Res 33:1084–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miao SL, Bazzaz FA (1990) Responses to nutrient pulses of two colonizers requiring different disturbance frequencies. Ecology 71:2166–2178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nowlin WH, González MJ, Vanni MJ et al (2007) Allochthonous subsidy of periodical cicadas affects the dynamics and stability of pond communities. Ecology 88:2174–2186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ostfeld RS, Keesing F (2000) Pulsed resources and community dynamics of consumers in terrestrial ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 15:232–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peek MS, Forseth IN (2003) Microhabitat dependent responses to resource pulses in the arid land perennial, Cryptantha flava. J Ecol 91:457–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Austria, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  25. Shaver GR, Melillo JM (1984) Nutrient budgets of marsh plants—efficiency concepts and relation to availability. Ecology 65:1491–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weiner J (1986) How competition for light and nutrients affects size variability in Ipomoea tricolor populations. Ecology 67:1425–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weiner J (1990) Asymmetric competition in plant-populations. Trends Ecol Evol 5:360–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weiner J, Solbrig OT (1984) The meaning and measurement of size hierarchies in plant populations. Oecologia 61:334–336Google Scholar
  29. Whiles MR, Callaham MA, Meyer CK et al (2001) Emergence of periodical cicadas (Magicicada cassini) from a Kansas riparian forest: densities, biomass and nitrogen flux. Am Midl Nat 145:176–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Williams KS, Simon C (1995) The ecology, behavior, and evolution of periodical cicadas. Annu Rev Entomol 40:269–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Williams KS, Smith KG, Stephen FM (1993) Emergence of 13-year periodical cicadas (Cicadidae, Magicicada)—phenology, mortality, and predator satiation. Ecology 74:1143–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilson SD, Tilman D (1993) Plant competition and resource availability in response to disturbance and fertilization. Ecology 74:599–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang LH (2004) Periodical cicadas as resource pulses in North American forests. Science 306:1565–1567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang LH (2006) Interactions between a detrital resource pulse and a detritivore community. Oecologia 147:522–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang LH (2008) Pulses of dead periodical cicadas increase herbivory of American bellflowers. Ecology 89:1497–1502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang LH, Karban R (2009) Long-term habitat selection and chronic root herbivory: explaining the relationship between periodical cicada density and tree growth. Am Nat 173:105–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang LH, Bastow JL, Spence KO, Wright AN (2008) What can we learn from resource pulses? Ecology 89:621–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang LH, Edwards K, Byrnes JE et al (2010) A meta-analysis of resource pulse–consumer interactions. Ecol Monogr 80:125–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations