Why ant pollination is rare: new evidence and implications of the antibiotic hypothesis
- 892 Downloads
The antibiotic hypothesis proposes that ant pollination is rare at least in part because the cuticular antimicrobial secretions of ants are toxic to pollen grains. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the effects of ants and bees on pollen in two regions: a tropical rainforest in Amazonian Peru and temperate forests and old fields in Canada. We found support for three predictions that follow from the antibiotic hypothesis. (1) For all 10 ant and 11 plant species in our study, contact with ants significantly reduced pollen germination, confirming the generality of this effect. (2) Contact with two bee species did not have similar effects; pollen exposed to bees germinated as well as control pollen. (3) Consistent with the presumed greater abundance of entomopathogens in the tropics, which may have selected for stronger antibiotic secretions in tropical ants, tropical ants had more negative effects on pollen than temperate ants. We speculate that the antibiotic hypothesis contributes not only to the rarity but also to the biogeography of ant pollination, and we discuss whether the negative effects of ants on pollen have resulted in selection for floral defenses against ants.
KeywordsAnt–plant interactions Cuticular antimicrobial secretions Disease resistance Insect immunity Hymenoptera Tropical rainforests
We thank Lina Arcila Hernández, Adam Cembrowski, Antonio Coral, Eddie Ho, Gabriel Miller, and Jon Sanders for field/laboratory assistance; Frank Azorsa Salazar, Laurence Packer, and Claus Rasmussen for identifying our Peruvian ants and bee; Takashi Makino, Alison Parker, and James Thomson for their comments and for supplying the B. impatiens; the residents of Port Whitby for allowing us to collect flowers; the directors and staff at CICRA/the Amazon Conservation Association and the Koffler Scientific Reserve at Jokers Hill for logistics and permission to work at these sites; and the Peruvian Ministry of Agriculture for issuing a research permit (No. 299-2011-AG-DGFFS-DGEFFS). We are also grateful to the AE and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft. A Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant to MEF funded this research; EMD was also supported by an NSERC Undergraduate Student Research Award.
- Hoffman AA, Clancy DJ, Merton E (1994) Cytoplasmic incompatibility in Australian populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 136:993–999Google Scholar
- Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Junker RR, Blüthgen N (2008) Floral scents repel potentially nectar-thieving ants. Evol Ecol Res 10:295–308Google Scholar
- Peakall R, Angus CJ, Beattie AJ (1990) The significance of ant and plant traits for ant pollination in Leporella fimbriata. Oecologia 84:457–460Google Scholar
- Pitman NCA (2008) An overview of the Los Amigos watershed, Madre de Dios, southeastern Peru. http://cicra.acca.org.pe/espanol/paisaje_biodiversidad/los-amigos-overview9.pdf
- Proctor M, Yeo P (1972) The Pollination of Flowers. Taplinger Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Raine NE, Willmer P, Stone GN (2002) Spatial structuring and floral avoidance behavior prevent ant-pollinator conflict in a Mexican ant-acacia. Ecology 83:3086–3098Google Scholar
- Rico-Gray V, Oliveira PS (2007) The ecology and evolution of ant-plant interactions. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Turillazzi S, Mastrobuoni G, Dani FR, Moneti G, Pieraccini G, la Marca G (2006) Dominulin A and B: two new antibacterial peptides identified on the cuticle and in the venom of the social paper wasp Polistes dominulus using MALDI-TOF, MALDI-TOF/TOF, and ESI-Ion trap. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 17:376–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar