Abstract
Solitary bees often form specialised mutualisms with particular plant species, while honeybees are considered to be relatively opportunistic foragers. Thus, it may be expected that solitary bees are more effective pollinators than honeybees when foraging on the same floral resource. To test this, we studied two Wahlenbergia species (Campanulaceae) in South Africa that are visited by both social honeybees and solitary bees, and which are shown here to be genetically self-incompatible and thus reliant on pollinator visits for seed production. Contrary to expectation, the solitary bee Lipotriches sp. (Halictidae) and social bee Apis mellifera (Apidae), which were the two most frequent visitors to flowers of the study species, were equally effective pollinators in terms of the consequences of single visits for fruit and seed set. Both bee species preferentially visited female phase flowers, which contain more nectar than male phase flowers. Male solitary bees of several genera frequently shelter overnight in flowers of both Wahlenbergia species, but temporal exclusion experiments showed that this behaviour makes little contribution to either seed production or pollen dispersal (estimated using a dye particle analogue). Manipulation of flower colour using a sunscreen that removed UV reflectance strongly reduced visits by both bee groups, while neither group responded to Wahlenbergia floral odour cues in choice tests. This study indicates that while flowers of Wahlenbergia cuspidata and W. krebsii are pollinated exclusively by bees, they are not under strong selection to specialise for pollination by any particular group of bees.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aigner PA (2001) Optimality modeling and fitness trade-offs: when should plants become pollinator specialists? Oikos 95:177–184
Alves-dos-Santos I, Gaglianone MC, Naxara SRC, Engels MS (2009) Male sleeping aggregations of solitary oil-collecting bees in Brazil (Centridini, Tapinotaspidini, and Tetrapediini; Hymenoptera: Apidae). Gene Mol Res 8:515–524
Anderson GJ, Bernardello G, Stuessy TF, Crawford DJ (2001) Breeding system and pollination of selected plants endemic to Juan Fernandez Islands. Am J Bot 88:220–233
Andersson S, Amundsen T (1997) Ultraviolet colour vision and ornamentation in bluethroats. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1587–1591
Arnold SEJ, Savolainen V, Chittka L (2009) Flower colours along an alpine altitude gradient, seen through the eyes of fly and bee pollinators. Arthropod Plant Interact 3:27–43
Beattie AJ (1971) A technique for the study of insect-borne pollen. Pan Pac Entomol 47:82
Bell G (1985) On the function of flowers. Proc R Soc of Lond B Biol Sci 224:223–265
Bernardello G, Anderson GJ, Stuessy TF, Crawford DJ (2001) A survey of floral traits, breeding systems, floral visitors, and pollination systems of the angiosperms of the Juan Fernandez Islands (Chile). Bot Rev 67:255–308
Bogdan AV (1962) Grass pollination by bees in Kenya. Proc Linn Soc Lond 173:57–60
Butz Huryn VM (1997) Ecological impacts of introduced honey bees. Q Rev Biol 72:275–297
Carthew SM (1993) An assessment of pollinator visitation to Banksia spinulosa. Aust J Ecol 18:257–268
Chittka L (1992) The colour hexagon: a chromaticity diagram based on photoreceptor excitations as a generalized representation of colour opponency. J Comp Physiol A (Sens Neural Behav Physio) 170:533–543
Chittka L, Kevan PG (2005) Flower colour as advertisement. In: Dafni A, Kevan PG, Husband BC (eds) Practical pollination biology. Enviroquest Ltd, Cambridge, pp 157–196
Chittka L, Wells H (2004) Color vision in bees: mechanisms, ecology, and evolution. In: Prete FR (ed) Complex worlds from simpler nervous systems. The MIT Press, Massachusetts, pp 165–191
Chittka L, Thomson JD, Waser NM (1999) Flower constancy, insect psychology, and plant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 86:361–377
Dafni A, Ivri Y, Brantjes NBM (1981) Pollination of Serapias vomeracea Briq. (Orchidaceae) by imitation of holes for sleeping solitary male bees (Hymenoptera). Acta Bot Neerl 30:69–73
Dyer AG, Chittka L (2004) Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) sacrifice foraging speed to solve difficult colour discrimination tasks. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 190:759–763
Free JB (1963) The flower constancy of honeybees. J Anim Ecol 32:119–131
Freitas BM, Paxton RJ (1998) A comparison of two pollinators: the introduced honey bee Apis mellifera and an indigenous bee Centris tarsata on Cashew Anacardium occidentale in its native range of NE Brazil. J Appl Ecol 35:109–121
Gess SK (1999) South African Bluebells. Wasps and bees, stars and bells: an intricate pollination study of Wahlenbergia. Veld Flora 85:80–81
Giurfa M (2004) Conditioning procedure and color discrimination in the honeybee Apis mellifera. Naturwissenschaften 91:228–231
Goulson D (2003) Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:1–26
Grant V (1950) The flower constancy of bees. Bot Rev 16:379–398
Gumbert A, Kunze J (2001) Colour similarity to rewarding model plants affects pollination in a food deceptive orchid, Orchis boryi. Biol J Linn Soc 72:419–433
Hargreaves AL, Harder LD, Johnson SD (2010) Native pollen thieves reduce the reproductive success of a hermaphroditic plant, Aloe maculate. Ecology 91:1693–1703
Heinrich B (1979) Resource heterogeneity and patterns of movement in foraging bumblebees. Oecologia 40:235–245
Hood GM (2008) PopTools version 3.0.6. Available on the internet. URL:http://www.csl.csiro.au/poptools
Howell AD, Alarcon R (2007) Osmia bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) can detect nectar-rewarding flowers using olfactory cues. Anim Behav 74:199–205
Immelman K, Eardley CD (2000) Gathering of grass pollen by solitary bees (Halictidae, Lipotriches) in South Africa. Mitt Mus Nat.kd Berl Zool Reihe 76:263–268
Johnson SD (2000) Batesian mimicry in the non-rewarding orchid Disa pulchra, and its consequences of pollinator behaviour. Biol J Linn Soc 71:119–132
Johnson SD, Hargreaves AL, Brown M (2006) Dark, bitter-tasting nectar functions as a filter of flower visitors in a bird-pollinated plant. Ecology 87:2709–2716
Kevan PG (1972) Insect pollination of high arctic flowers. J Ecol 60:831–847
Klein A-M, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003) Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees. Pro Roy Soc Lon B 270:955–961
Larsson M (2005) Higher pollinator effectiveness by specialist than generalist flower-visitors of unspecialized Knauita arvensis (Dipsacaceae). Oecologia 146:394–403
Lau JA, Galloway LF (2004) Effects of low-efficiency pollinators on plant fitness and floral trait evolution in Campanula americana (Campanulaceae). Oecologia 141:577–583
Le Corff J, Agren J, Schemske DW (1998) Floral display, pollination discrimination and female reproductive success in two monoecious Begonia species. Ecology 79:1610–1619
Linsley EG (1958) The ecology of solitary bees. Hilgardia 27:543–599
Lloyd DG, Yates JMA (1982) Intrasexual selection and the segregation of pollen and stigmas in hermaphrodite plants, exemplified by Wahlenbergia albomarginata (Campanulaceae). Evolution 36:903–913
Loper GM, Berdel RL (1980) The effects of nine pollen diets on brood rearing of honeybees. Apidologie 11:351–359
Michener CD (1965) A classification of the bees of the Australian and South Pacific regions. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 130:1–324
Michener CD (2000) The bees of the world. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Moritz RFA, Southwick EE (1992) Bees as superorganisms: an evolutionary reality. Springer, Berlin
Müller A (1996) Host-plant specialization in western palearctic anthidiine bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Megachilidae). Ecol Monogr 66:235–257
Olsen KM (1997) Pollination effectiveness and pollinator importance in a population of Heterotheca subaxillaris (Asteraceae). Oecologia 109:114–121
Pellmyr O (2002) Pollination by animals. In: Herrara CM, Pellmyr O (eds) Plant-animal interactions: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 157–184
Peter CI, Johnson SD (2008) Mimics and magnets: the importance of colour and ecological facilitation in floral deception. Ecology 89:1583–1595
Petterson JA (1997) Revision of the genus Wahlenbergia (Campanulaceae) in New Zealand. New Zeal J Bot 35:9–54
Pimentel De Carvalho A, Message D (2004) A scientific note on the toxic pollen of Stryphnodendron polyphyllum (Fabaceae, Mimosoideae) which causes sacbrood-like symptoms. Apidologie 35:89–90
Rader R, Howlett BG, Cunninghams SA, Westcott DA, Newstrom-Lloyd LE, Walker MK, Teulon DAJ, Edwards W (2009) Alternative pollinator taxa are equally efficient but not as effective as the honeybee in a mass flowering crop. J Appl Ecol 46:1080–1087
Raine NE, Ings TC, Dornhaus A, Saleh N, Chittka L (2006) Adaptation, genetic drift, pleiotropy, and history in the evolution of bee foraging behavior. Adv Stud Behav 36:305–354
Ribbands CR (1953) The behaviour and social life of honeybees. Bee Research Associates, London
Sapir Y, Shmida A, Ne’eman G (2005) Pollination of Oncocylus irises (Iris: Iridaceae) by night-sheltering male bees. Plant Biol 7:417–424
Schlindwein C, Wittman D, Martins CF, Hamm A, Siqueira JA, Schiffler D, Machado IC (2005) Pollination of Campanula rapunculus L. (Campanulaceae): how much pollen flows into pollination and into reproduction of oligolectic pollinators? Plant Syst Evol 250:147–156
Scopece G, Cozzolino S, Johnson SD, Schiestl FP (2010) Pollination efficiency and the evolution of specialized deceptive pollination systems. Am Nat 175:98–105
Sedivy C, Müller A, Dorn S (2001) Closely related pollen generalist bees differ in their ability to develop on the same pollen diet: evidence for physiological adaptations to digist pollen. Funct Ecol 25:718–725
Seeley TD (1985) Honeybee ecology: a study of adaptation in social life. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Seeley TD (1989) The honey bee colony as a superorganism. Am Sci 77:546–553
Shuttleworth A, Johnson SD (2009) The importance of scent and nectar filters in a specialized wasp-pollination system. Funct Ecol 23:931–940
Simpson BB, Neff JL (1981) Floral rewards: alternatives to pollen and nectar. Ann Mo Bot Gard 68:301–322
Snodgrass RE (1956) Anatomy of the honey bee. Cornell University Press, New York
Soderstrom TR, Calderon CE (1971) Insect pollination in tropical rain forests. Biotropica 3:1–16
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1994) Biometry: the principles and practices of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman, New York
Spears EE Jr (1983) A direct measure of pollinator effectiveness. Oecologia 57:196–199
Stebbins GL (1970) Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms, I: pollination mechanisms. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:307–326
Steiner KE, Whitehead VB (1988) The association between oil-producing flowers and oil-collecting bees in the Drakensberg of southern Africa. Monogr Syst Bot Mo Bot Gard 25:259–277
Strickler K (1979) Specialization and foraging efficiency of solitary bees. Ecology 60:998–1009
Thomson JD, Goodell K (2001) Pollen removal and deposition by honeybee and bumblebee visitors to apple and almond flowers. J Appl Ecol 38:1032–1044
von Frisch K (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Waser NM (1983) The adaptive nature of floral traits: ideas and evidence. In: Real LK (ed) Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 242–286
Waser NM (1986) Flower constancy: definition, cause, and measurement. Am Nat 127:593–603
Weatherwax PB (1986) Why do honeybees reject certain flowers? Oecologia 69:567–570
Wells H, Wells PH (1983) Honey bee foraging ecology: optimal diet, minimal uncertainty or individual constancy? J Anim Ecol 52:829–836
Westerkamp C (1991) Honeybees are poor pollinators—why? Plant Syst Evol 177:71–75
Williams NM (2003) Use of novel pollen species by specialists and generalist solitary bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Oecologia 134:228–237
Wilson P, Thomson JD (1991) Heterogeneity among floral visitors leads to discordance between removal and deposition of pollen. Ecology 72:1503–1507
Winston L (1991) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Wright GA, Schiestl FP (2009) Floral scent in a whole-plant context. The evolution of floral scent: the influence of olfactory learning by insect pollinators on the honest signalling of floral rewards. Funct Ecol 23:841–851
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to C. Eardley, ARC-plant protection research institute for identifying the bees to species. For their valuable assistance in this study, Dr. A. Juergens, S-L. Steenhuisen, A. Shutterworth, J. Rodger and M. Mgobozi are thanked. Ezumvelo KZN Wildlife, in particular Dr. I. Rushworth, the Pierce family and Mondi-Shanduka are thanked for permission to work at Midmar Reserve, Midmar farmlands and Gilboa Estate, respectively. Lars Chittka and three anonymous reviewers are thanked for their comments and suggestions. R. Welsford is thanked for his company and support during field work at Gilboa Estate. This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of South Africa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Lars Chittka.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Welsford, M.R., Johnson, S.D. Solitary and social bees as pollinators of Wahlenbergia (Campanulaceae): single-visit effectiveness, overnight sheltering and responses to flower colour. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 6, 1–14 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-011-9149-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-011-9149-0