Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Behavioral plasticity of a grass-feeding caterpillar in response to spiny- or smooth-edged leaf blades

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ontogenetic changes in feeding behavior of armyworms, Pseudaletia unipucta (Haworth), were compared on tall fescue [Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort] cultivars with spiny-, intermediate-, or smooth-edged leaf blades to clarify whether the edge spines deter caterpillars, in which case release of modified, smooth-edged forage grasses for improved livestock performance might aggravate armyworm damage to pastures. Edge biting, success initiating edge-feeding, and propensity to window- or edge-feed were observed for individual 2nd, 3rd, or 4th instars on grass leaf blades with intact margins. Early second instars bit smooth and spiny leaf edges with equal frequency but were unable to initiate edge-feeding. They fed on leaf edges after margins were cut away, but not when leaf juice was applied to intact edges, indicating the leaf margin is a barrier. Third and 4th instars mostly edge-fed on smooth leaves, but on the grasses with spiny margins they compensated for the difficulty of edge-feeding by prolonging their window-feeding. There was no developmental cost to window-feeding by 3rd instars, but 4th instars suffered reduced weight gain on spiny grass apparently because, unlike earlier instars, their mandibles are too large and not well shaped for efficient window-feeding between the parallel vascular bundles. Armyworms display behavioral plasticity in feeding mode in response to spiny- versus smooth-edged grasses. Greater use of smooth-bladed pasture grasses may result in proportionately more edge-feeding by armyworms but is unlikely to result in markedly greater pasture losses because this grass-feeding specialist so effectively exploits conventional tall fescue despite its structural characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Analytical Software (2008) Statistix 9.0. Analytical software, Tallahassee, FL

  • Bernays EA (1986) Diet-induced head allometry among foliage-chewing insects and its importance for graminivores. Science 231:495–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA (1991) Evolution of insect morphology in relation to plants. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 333:257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Barbehenn R (1987) Nutritional ecology of grass foliage-chewing insects. In: Slansky F Jr, Rodriguez JG (eds) Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, spiders, and related invertebrates. Wiley, New York, pp 147–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxton DR, Mertens DR (1995) Quality-related characteristics of forages. In: Barnes RF, Miller DA, Nelson CJ (eds) Forages, vol. II an introduction to grassland agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 83–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso MZ (2008) Herbivore handling of a plant’s trichome: the case of Heliconius charithonia (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) and Passiflora lobata (Killip) Hutch. (Passifloraceae). Neotrop Entomol 37:247–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choong MF, Lucas PW, Ong JSY, Pereira B, Tan HTW, Turner IM (1992) Leaf fracture toughness and sclerophylly: their correlations and ecological implications. New Phytol 121:597–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clissold FJ (2007) The biomechanics of chewing and plant fracture: mechanisms and implications. Adv Plant Physiol 34:317–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley PD (1983) Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a lowland tropical forest. Ecol Monogr 53:209–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon PM, Lowrie S, McKey D (1983) Disarming the “evil woman”: petiole constriction by a sphingid larva circumvents mechanical defenses of its host plant, Cnidoscolus urens (Euphorbiaceae). Biotropica 15:112–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockter DE (1993) Developmental changes and wear of larval mandibles in Heterocampa guttivitta and H. subrotata (Notodontidae). J Lepid Soc 47:32–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussourd DE (1993) Foraging with finesse: caterpillar adaptations for circumventing plant defenses. In: Stamp NE, Casey T (eds) Caterpillars: ecological and evolutionary constraints on foraging. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 92–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton HS, Lee CK, Fitzgerald RD (1994) Tall fescue in Australia and New Zealand. N Z J Agric Res 37:405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeny P (1970) Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. Ecology 51:565–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry GL, Dyer LA (2002) On the conditional nature of neotropical caterpillar defenses against their natural enemies. Ecology 83:3108–3119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey GL, Miller JS, Carter DJ (1989) Two mouthpart modifications in larval Notodontidae (Lepidoptera)—their taxonomic distributions and putative functions. J NY Entomol Soc 97:455–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Guppy JC (1961) Life history and behavior of the armyworm, Pseudaletia unipuncta (Haw.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in eastern Ontario. Can Entomol 93:1141–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen RH, Chabot JF (1986) Leaf anatomy of maples (Acer) and host use by Lepidoptera larvae. Oikos 47:335–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley ME, Lamont BB, Fairbanks MM, Rafferty CM (2007) Plant structural traits and their role in anti-herbivore defence. Perspect Plant Ecol 8:157–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochuli DF (2001) Insect herbivory and ontogeny: how do growth and development influence feeding behavior, morphology and host use? Austral Ecol 26563–570

  • Hulley PE (1988) Caterpillar attacks plant mechanical defence by mowing trichomes before feeding. Ecol Entomol 13:239–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keathley CP, Potter DA (2011) Does modification of tall fescue leaf texture and forage nutritive value for improved livestock performance increase suitability for a grass-feeding caterpillar? Crop Sci 51:370–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson S, Ohmart CP (1988) Leaf age and larval performance of the leaf beetle Paropsis atomaria. Ecol Entomol 13:19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin D (1973) The role of trichomes in plant defense. Q Rev Biol 48:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mithöfer A, Wanner G, Boland W (2005) Effects of feeding Spodoptera littoralis on lima bean leaves. II. continuous mechanical wounding resembling insect feeding is sufficient to elicit herbivory-related volatile emission. Plant Physiol 137:1160–1168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols-Orians CM, Schultz JC (1990) Interactions among leaf toughness, chemistry, and harvesting by attine ants. Ecol Entomol 15:311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmart CP, Edwards PB (1991) Insect herbivory on eucalyptus. Annu Rev Entomol 36:637–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters PJ (2002) Correlations between leaf structural traits and the densities of herbivorous insect guilds. Biol J Linn Soc 77:43–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters PJ, Sanson G, Read J (2007) Leaf biomechanical properties and the densities of herbivorous insect guilds. Func Ecol 21:246–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathcke BJ, Poole RW (1975) Coevolutionary race continues: butterfly larval adaptation to plant trichomes. Science 187:175–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reavey D (1993) Why body size matters to caterpillars. In: Stamp NE, Casey T (eds) Caterpillars: ecological and evolutionary constraints on foraging. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 248–278

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2003) SAS 9.1. SAS institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven LM, van Loon JJA, Dicke M (2005) Insect-plant biology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shade RE, Wilson MC (1967) Leaf-vein spacing as a factor affecting larval feeding behavior of the cereal leaf beetle, Oulema melanopus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 60:493–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Turlings TCJ, Loughrin JH, McCall PJ, Röse USR, Lewis WJ, Tumlinson JH (1995) How caterpillar-damaged plants protect themselves by attracting parasitic wasps. Proc Natl Acad Sci 92:4169–4174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent JFV (1991) Strength and fracture of grasses. J Mat Sci 26:1947–1950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenk P (2002) Great new grasses. Hay and Forage Grower, March 1, 2002

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank C. Redmond, E. Dobbs, C. Elder, J. Houle, V. Jacquier, and E. Avet for technical assistance, T. Phillips for advice selecting grass cultivars, D. Brown for advice establishing grasses, M. Sharkey and S. Clutts for assistance with microscope photography, D. Yu for electron microscope training, and A. Boring for wasp identification. This work was supported by USDA FAPRU grant number 6440-21000-001-00. This is paper number 10-08-131 of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, S-225 Agriculture Science Building North, Lexington, KY, 40546-0091, USA

    Craig P. Keathley & Daniel A. Potter

Authors
  1. Craig P. Keathley
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel A. Potter
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel A. Potter.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Stanislav Gorb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keathley, C.P., Potter, D.A. Behavioral plasticity of a grass-feeding caterpillar in response to spiny- or smooth-edged leaf blades. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 5, 339–349 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-011-9138-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-011-9138-3

Keywords