Skip to main content
Log in

Why do many galls have conspicuous colours? An alternative hypothesis revisited

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been proposed that the colour of many plant galls evolved as an aposematic signal to protect the contained gall-maker from attack by chewing herbivores. But the evidence would suggest the more likely hypothesis is that the colour is caused by the galler inducing the gall to senesce early, thus releasing nutrients from the dying tissues of the gall to the benefit of the gall-maker. External agents, like chewing herbivores or natural enemies of the gall-maker, may subsequently learn to use these colours as signals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Crawford SA, Wilkens S (1996) Ultrastructural aspects of damage to leaves of Eucalyptus camaldulensis by the psyllid Cardiaspina retator. Micron 27:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inbar M, Izhaki I, Koplovich A, Lupo I, Silanikove N, Glasser T, Gerchman Y, Perevolotsky A, Lev-Yadun S (2010) Why do many galls have conspicuous colors? A new hypothesis. Arthropod Plant Interact 4:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White TCR (1993) The inadequate environment: nitrogen and the abundance of animals. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • White TCR (2009) Plant vigour versus plant stress: a false dichotomy. Oikos 118:807–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. C. R. White.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Heikki Hokkanen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, T.C.R. Why do many galls have conspicuous colours? An alternative hypothesis revisited. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 4, 149–150 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-010-9096-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-010-9096-1

Keywords

Navigation