Skip to main content
Log in

Is a mango just a mango? Testing within-fruit oviposition site choice and larval performance of a highly polyphagous fruit fly

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For fruit flies, fully ripe fruit is preferred for adult oviposition and is superior for offspring performance over unripe or ripening fruit. Because not all parts of a single fruit ripen simultaneously, the opportunity exists for adult fruit flies to selectively choose riper parts of a fruit for oviposition and such selection, if it occurs, could positively influence offspring performance. Such fine scale host variation is rarely considered in fruit fly ecology, however, especially for polyphagous species which are, by definition, considered to be generalist host users. Here we study the adult oviposition preference/larval performance relationship of the Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae), a highly polyphagous pest species, at the “within-fruit” level to see if such a host use pattern occurs. We recorded the number of oviposition attempts that female flies made into three fruit portions (top, middle and bottom), and larval behavior and development within different fruit portions for ripening (color change) and fully-ripe mango, Mangifera indica L. (Anacardiaceae). Results indicate that female B. dorsalis do not oviposit uniformly across a mango fruit, but lay most often in the top (i.e., stalk end) of fruit and least in the bottom portion, regardless of ripening stage. There was no evidence of larval feeding site preference or performance (development time, pupal weight, percent pupation) being influenced by fruit portion, within or across the fruit ripening stages. There was, however, a very significant effect on adult emergence rate from pupae, with adult emergence rate from pupae from the bottom of ripening mango being approximately only 50% of the adult emergence rate from the top of ripening fruit, or from both the top and bottom of fully-ripe fruit. Differences in mechanical (firmness) and chemical (total soluble solids, titratable acidity, total non-structural carbohydrates) traits between different fruit portions were correlated with adult fruit utilisation. Our results support a positive adult preference/offspring performance relationship at within-fruit level for B. dorsalis. The fine level of host discrimination exhibited by B. dorsalis is at odds with the general perception that, as a polyphagous herbivore, the fly should show very little discrimination in its host use behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abreu AG, Prado PI, Norrbom AL, Solferini VN (2005) Genetic and morphological diagnosis and description of two cryptic species of flower head-infesting Tephritidae (Diptera). Insect Sys Evol 36:361–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Allwood AJ, Chinajariyawong A, Drew RAI, Hamacek EL, Hancock DL, Hengsawad C, Jipanin JC, Jirasurat M, Kong Krong C, Kritsaneepaiboon S, Leong CTS, Vijaysegaran S (1999) Host plant records for fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in South East Asia. Raffles Bull Zool Supplement No. 7:1–92

  • Aluja M, Díaz-Fleischer F, Arredondo J (2004) Non-host status of commercial Persea americana ‘Hass’ to Anastrepha ludens, Anastrepha obliqua, Anastrepha serpentina, Anastrepha striata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Mexico. J Econ Entomol 97:293–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balagawi S, Vijaysegaran S, Drew RAI, Raghu S (2005) Influence of fruit traits on oviposition preference and offspring performance of Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on three tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum) cultivars. Aust J Entomol 44:97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Chapman RF (1994) Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidwell RGS (1979) Plant physiology, 2nd edn. Macmillan Publishing, New York, pp 165–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruzzone ND, Economopoulos AP, Wang H-S (1990) Mass rearing Ceratitis capitata: reuse of the finisher larval diet. Entomol Exp Appl 56:103–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey JR (1984) Host-specific demographic studies of the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata. Ecol Entomol 9:261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CL, Kurashima R, Albrecht C (2000) Effect of limiting concentrations of growth factors in mass rearing diets for Ceratitis capitata larvae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 93:898–903

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke AR, Allwood A, Chinajariyawong A, Drew RAI, Hengsawad C, Jirasurat M, Kong Krong C, Kritsaneepaiboon S, Vijaysegaran S (2001) Seasonal abundance and host use patterns of seven Bactrocera Macquart species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Thailand and Peninsular Malaysia. Raffles Bull Zool 49:207–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke AR, Armstrong KF, Carmichael AE, Milne JR, Raghu S, Roderick GK, Yeates DK (2005) Invasive phytophagous pests arising through a recent tropical evolutionary radiation: The Bactrocera dorsalis complex of fruit flies. Annu Rev Entomol 50:293–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Condon M, Adams DC, Bann D, Flaherty K, Gammons J, Johnson J, Lewis ML, Marsteller S, Scheffer SJ, Serna F, Swensen S (2008) Uncovering tropical diversity: six sympatric cryptic species of Blepharoneura (Diptera: Tephritidae) in flowers of Gurania spinulosa (Cucurbitaceae) in eastern Ecuador. Biol J Linn Soc 93:779–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Fleischer F, Aluja M (2003) Clutch size in frugivorous insects as a function of host firmness: the case of the tephritid fly Anastrepha ludens. Ecol Entomol 28:268–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Fleischer F, Papaj DR, Prokopy RJ, Norrbom AL, Aluja M (2001) Evolution of fruit fly oviposition behavior. In: Aluja M, Norrbom AL (eds) Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC Press, New York, pp 811–842

    Google Scholar 

  • DiTommaso A, Losey JE (2003) Oviposition preference and larval performance of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) on two invasive swallow-wort species. Entomol Exp Appl 108:205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economopoulos AP, Al-Taweel AA, Bruzzone ND (1990) Larval diet with a starter phase for mass-rearing Ceratitis capitata: substitution and refinement in the use of yeasts and sugars. Entomol Exp Appl 55:239–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes-Da-Silva PG, Zucoloto FS (1993) The influence of host nutritive value on the performance and food selection in Ceratitis capitata (Diptera, Tephritidae). J Insect Physiol 39:883–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitt GP (1981) The ecology of Northern Australian Dacinae I. Host phenology and utilisation of Opilia amentacea Roxb. (Opiliaceae) by Dacus (Bactrocera) opiliae Drew & Hardy, with notes on some other species. Aust J Zool 29:691–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher BS (1989) Life history strategies of tephritid fruit flies. In: Robinson AS, Hooper G (eds) Fruit flies their biology, natural enemies and control, vol 3B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontellas-Brandalha TML, Zucoloto FS (2004) Selection of oviposition sites by wild Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart) (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on the nutritional composition. Neotrop Entomol 33:557–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham GC (2006) Phylogenetics of the Australasian Dacinae. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Queensland

  • Greany PD, Shaw PE, Davis PL, Hatton TT (1985) Senescence-related susceptibility of march grape fruit to laboratory infestation by Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla Entomol 68:144–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock DL, Hamacek EL, Lloyd AC, Elson-Harris MM (2000) The distribution and host plants of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Australia. DPI Publications, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM (1982) Defense of ripe fruit from pests: its significance in relation to plant-disperser interactions. Am Nat 120:218–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge JE, Hofreiter BT (1962) Determination of reducing sugars and carbohydrates. In: Whislter RL, Wolfron ML (eds) Method in carbohydrate chemistry, vol I. Academic Press, New York, pp 380–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme AC (1971) The mango. In: Hulme AC (ed) The biochemistry of fruits and their products, vol II. Academic Press, London, pp 233–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang EB, Light DM (1991) Behavioral responses of female oriental fruit flies to the odor of papayas at three ripeness stages in a laboratory flight tunnel (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Insect Behav 4:751–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joachim-Bravo IS, Zucoloto FS (1998) Performance and feeding behavior of Ceratitis capitata: comparison of a wild population and a laboratory population. Entomol Exp Appl 87:67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joachim-Bravo IS, Fernandes OA, de Bortoli SA, Zucoloto FS (2001) Oviposition behavior of Ceratitis capitata Wiedemann (Diptera: Tephritidae): association between oviposition preference and larval performance in individual females. Neotrop Entomol 30:559–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joel DM (1978) The secretory ducts of mango fruits: a defense system effective against the Mediterranean fruit fly. Isr J Bot 27:44–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaspi R, Parrella MP (2003) The feasibility of using the sterile insect technique against Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae) infesting greenhouse chrysanthemum. Ann Appl Biol 143:25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaspi R, Taylor PW, Yuval B (2000) Diet and size influence sexual advertisement and copulatory success of males in Mediterranean fruit fly leks. Ecol Entomol 25:279–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaspi R, Mossinson S, Drezner T, Kamensky B, Yuval B (2002) Effects of larval diet on development rates and reproductive maturation of male and female Mediterranean fruit flies. Physiol Entomol 27:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil H, Wasserman D, Dawson CR (1946) Mango dermatitis and its relationship to poison-ivy hypersensitivity. Ann Allergy 4:268–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Knio KM, Goeden RD, Headrick DH (2007a) Genetic differentiation between the sibling and sympatric flower-head infesting tephritids: The polyphage, Trupanea nigricornis (Coquillett), and the narrowly oligophagous, T-bisetosa (Coquillett) (Diptera : Tephritidae). Proc Entomol Soc Wash 109:295–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Knio KM, White IM, Al-Zein MS (2007b) Host-race formation in Chaetostomella cylindrica (Diptera : Tephritidae): Morphological and morphometric evidence. J Nat Hist 41:1697–1715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krainacker DA, Carey JR, Vargas RI (1987) Effect of larval host on life history traits of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. Oecologia 73:583–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linskens HF, Jackson JF (eds) (1995) Modern methods of plant analysis volume 18: fruit analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp 112–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Liquido NJ, Chan HT Jr, McQuate GT (1995) Hawaiian tephritid fruit flies (Diptera): integrity of the infestation-free quarantine prodedure for ‘Sharwil’ avocado. J Econ Entomol 88:85–96

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macheix J-J, Fleuriet A, Billot J (eds) (1990) Fruit phenolics. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, pp 152–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsteller S, Adams DC, Collyer ML, Condon M (2009) Six cryptic species on a single species of host plant: morphometric evidence for possible reproductive character displacement. Ecol Entomol 34:66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medlicott AP, Thompson AK (1985) Analysis of sugars and organic acids in ripening mango fruits (Mangifera indica L. var Keitt) by high performance liquid chromatography. J Sci Food Agric 36:561–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Messina FJ, Jones VP (1990) Relationship between fruit phenology and infestation by the apple maggot (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Utah. Ann Entomol Soc Am 83:742–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Messina FJ, Alston DG, Jones VP (1991) Oviposition by the Western cherry fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in relation to host development. J Kans Entomol Soc 64:197–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Navrozidis EI, Tzanakakis ME (2005) Tomato fruits as an alternative host for a laboratory strain of the olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae. Phytoparasitica 33:225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaj DR, Alonso-Pimentel H (1997) Why walnut flies superparasitize: time savings as a possible explanation. Oecologia 109:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaj DR, Katsoyannos BI, Hendrichs J (1989) Use of fruit wounds in oviposition by Mediterranean fruit flies. Entomol Exp Appl 53:203–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck SL, McQuate GT (2004) Ecological aspects of Bactrocera latifrons (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Maui, Hawaii: movement and host preference. Environ Entomol 33:1722–1731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rattanapun W, Amornsak W, Clarke AR (2009) Bactrocera dorsalis preference for and performance on two mango varieties at three stages of ripeness. Entomol Exp Appl 131:243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo ST, Farias GJ, Harris EJ (1982) Oriental fruit fly: ripening of fruit and its effect on index of infestation of Hawaiian papayas. J Econ Entomol 75:173–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith D, Paulsen GM, Raguse CA (1964) Extraction of total available carbohydrates from grass and legume tissue. Plant Physiol 39:960–962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CA, Al-Zein MS, Sayar NP, Knio KM (2009) Host races in Chaetostomella cylindrica (Diptera: Tephritidae): genetic and behavioural evidence. Bull Entomol Res 99:425–432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stireman JO, Nason JD, Heard SB (2005) Host-associated genetic differentiation in phytophagous insects: General phenomenon or isolated exceptions? Evidence from a goldenrod-insect community. Evolution 59:2573–2587

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DB (2004) Hot peppers as a host for the Mexican fruit fly Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla Entomol 87:603–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Nouhuys S, Singer MC, Nieminen M (2003) Spatial and temporal patterns of caterpillar performance and the suitability of two plant species. Ecol Entomol 28:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas RI, Walsh WA, Nishida T (1995) Colonization of newly planted coffee fields: Dominance of Mediterranean fruit fly over Oriental fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Econ Entomol 88:620–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter GH (2003) Insect pest management and ecological research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson K (1988) Egg laying decisions by the bean weevil Callosobruchus maculatus. Ecol Entomol 13:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods B, Lacey IB, Brockway CA, Johnstone CP (2005) Hosts of Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) from Broome and the Broome Peninsula, Western Australia. Aust J Entomol 44:437–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuval B, Kaspi R, Shloush S, Warburg MS (1998) Nutritional reserves regulate male participation in Mediterranean fruit fly leks. Ecol Entomol 23:211–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucoloto FS (1987) Feeding habits of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae): can larvae recognize a nutritionally effective diets? J Insect Physiol 33:349–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucoloto FS (1991) Effects of flavour and nutritional value on diet selection by Ceratitis capitata larvae (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Insect Physiol 37:21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the National Biological Control Research Center (NBCRC), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand, for allowing us to carry out the experiment in the laboratory and Dr. Kriengkrai Jumroenma, Entomology and Zoology Group, Plant Protection Research and Development Office, Department of Agriculture, Bangkok, Thailand, for providing the initial fruit fly colony. We are also grateful to Dr. Kawit Wanichkul from Department of Horticulture and to staff of Postharvest Research Unit, Central Laboratory and Greenhouse Complex, Kampheangsean Campus, Kasetsart University, Nakhonpathom, Thailand, for suggestions and help on fruit property analysis. This study was funded by the Graduate School of Kasetsart University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wigunda Rattanapun.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Gimme Walter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rattanapun, W., Amornsak, W. & Clarke, A.R. Is a mango just a mango? Testing within-fruit oviposition site choice and larval performance of a highly polyphagous fruit fly. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 4, 35–44 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-009-9083-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-009-9083-6

Keywords

Navigation