Skip to main content

Grundlagen der pränatalen Diagnostik

Basics of prenatal diagnostics

Zusammenfassung

Pränatale Diagnostik kann heute mit unterschiedlichen Methoden, nichtinvasiv und invasiv, erfolgen. Gute humangenetische Grundkenntnisse sind erforderlich, um die Rat suchende Schwangere mit ihrem Partner umfassend zu informieren, damit von diesen auf der Grundlage des „informed consent“ alle notwendigen Entscheidungen getroffen werden können.

Abstract

Prenatal diagnosis now can be offered with different methods – noninvasive and invasive. Excellent knowledge of human genetics is needed to provide the pregnant woman and her partner with adequate information so that decisions can be made based on informed consent.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. 1.

    Brun JL, Gangbo F, Wen ZQ et al. (2004) Prenatal diagnosis and management of sex chromosome aneuploidy: a report on 98 cases. Prenat Diagn 24: 213–218

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Braude P (2006) IVF results: optimize not maximize. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194: 322–331

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ferguson-Smith MA, Yates JR (1984) Maternal age specific rates for chromosome aberrations and factors influencing them: report on a collaborative European study on 52965 amniocenteses. Prenat Diagn 4: 5–44

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Shaffer LG, Bui TH (2007) Molecular cytogenetic and rapid aneuploidy detection methods in prenatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet 145C: 87–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Slater HR, Bruno DL, Ren H et al. (2003) Rapid, high-throughput prenatal detection of aneuploidy using a novel quantitative method (MLPA). J Med Genet 40: 907-912

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Spencer K, Souter V, Tul N et al. (1999) A screening program for trisomy 21 at 10–14 weeks using fetal nuchal translucency, maternal serum free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13: 231–377

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Steele MW, Breg WR Jr (1966) Chromosome analysis of human amniotic-fluid cells. Lancet 1: 383–385

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Stengel-Rudkowski S, Stene J, Gallano P (1988) Risk estimates in balanced parental reciprocal translocations. Analysis of 1120 pedigrees. Monographie des Annales de Génétique, Paris

  9. 9.

    Wald NJ, Watt HC, Hackshaw AK (1999) Integrated screening for Down’s syndrome on the basis of tests performed during the first and second trimesters. N Engl J Med 341: 461–467

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Murken J (2006) Pränatale Diagnostik. In: Murken J, Grimm T, Holinski-Feder E (Hrsg) Taschenlehrbuch Humangenetik. Thieme, Stuttgart

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Grimm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aichinger, E., Zerres, K. & Grimm, T. Grundlagen der pränatalen Diagnostik. medgen 20, 315–325 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11825-008-0125-8

Download citation

Schlüsselwörter

  • Pränataldiagnostik
  • Präimplantationsdiagnostik
  • Polkörperdiagnostik
  • Chorionzottenbiopsie
  • Amniozentese
  • Ersttrimester-Screening

Keywords

  • Prenatal diagnosis
  • Preimplantation genetic diagnosis
  • Polar body analysis
  • Chorionic villus sampling
  • Amniocentesis
  • First-trimester screening