Skip to main content
Log in

Global evaluation of economics of microalgae-based biofuel supply chain using GIS-based framework

  • Biotechnology
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A microalgae-based biofuel supply chain was designed for different geographic regions, considering the local environmental conditions of sunlight, temperature, and available resources of water and CO2. The supply chain was designed in three distinct areas, Texas, U.S., Northern Territory of Australia, and La Guajira, Colombia, selected through a global analysis of suitable land based on GIS. A three-stage design framework developed in our previous research was improved to include a biomass productivity estimation model based on operating data provided by Algenol, a new photobioreactor (PBR) cultivation technology, direct air capture of CO2 as a feedstock option, and functional-unit based optimization. The framework focuses on the comparison of two major cultivation platforms, open raceway pond (ORP) and photobioreactor (PBR) using a net present value metric. A mixed-integer fractional programming (MIFP) model was formulated to make multi-period strategic and tactical decisions related to the supply chain design and operation under the objective of minimizing the total cost per gasoline gallon equivalent of products (GGE). Under the same assumptions, the supply chain was designed for seven years and the cost was estimated to be $15.5, $13.5, and $14.0/GGE for the U.S., Colombia, and Australia, respectively. While various processing pathways were considered in the model, only a single pathway involving PBR, an algae strain AB1166, and hydrothermal lique-faction was selected in all regions owing to its cost-efficiency. Direct air capture and hypothetical saline water species scenarios were examined to analyze the effect of alternative resource sources on the supply chain design and economics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Z. Navas-Anguita, D. García-Gusano and D. Iribarren, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 112, 11 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. World Energy Outlook 2019, International Energy Agency (2019).

  3. Z. Zhang, L. Lohr, C. Escalante and M. Wetzstein, Energy Policy, 38, 445 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Tayari, R. Abedi and A. Rahi, Renew. Energy, 147, 1058 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Schwab, Bioenergy Technologies Office Multi-Year Program Plan. March 2016, Bioenergy Technologies Office (2016).

  6. J. C. Quinn and R. Davis, Bioresour. Technol., 184, 444 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Banerjee and S. Ramaswamy, Bioresour. Technol. Rep., 8, 100328 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. F. Correa, H. L. Beyer, H. P. Possingham, S. R. Thomas-Hall and P. M. Schenk, Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy, 11, 914 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K. G. Nodooshan, R. J. Moraga, S.-J. G. Chen, C. Nguyen, Z. Wang and S. Mohseni, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 57, 6910 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Kang, S. Heo, M. J. Realff and J. H. Lee, Appl. Energy, 265, 114773 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Mohseni, M. S. Pishvaee and H. Sahebi, Energy, 111, 736 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Kang, S. Heo and J. H. Lee, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 58, 944 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Chance and P. Roessler, Production of Biocrude in an Advanced Photobioreactor-Based Biorefinery, Algenol Biotech (2020).

  14. A. Karemore, Y. Yuan, W. Porubsky and R. Chance, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 117, 3081 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Z. Zhong and F. You, Comput. Chem. Eng., 61, 90 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative Land Cover https://www.esa-landcover-cci.org/ (accessed July 2020).

  17. CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90m Digital Elevation Database v4.1, https://cgiarcsi.community/data/srtm-90m-digital-elevation-database-v4-1/ (accessed March 2020).

  18. J. Ferrell and V. Sarisky-Reed, National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Biomass Program. (2010).

  19. NASA Prediction Of Worldwide Energy Resources, https://power.larc.nasa.gov/data-access-viewer/ (accessed November 2020).

  20. J. N. Clippinger and R. E. Davis, Techno-Economic Analysis for the Production of Algal Biomass via Closed Photobioreactors: Future Cost Potential Evaluated Across a Range of Cultivation System Designs, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2019).

  21. Q. Li and C. E. Canter, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy and Water Use of Photobioreactors for Algal Cultivation and Biofuels Production, Argonne National Laboratory (2017).

  22. J. C. Quinn, K. B. Catton, S. Johnson and T. H. Bradley, Bioenergy Res., 6, 591 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. E. R. Venteris, R. C. McBride, A. M. Coleman, R. L. Skaggs and M. S. Wigmosta, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 3559 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. The European Commission Joint Research Center, Global Surface Water Explorer, https://global-surface-water.appspot.com/#data (accessed October 2020).

  25. Natural Earth, 1:10m Urban areas, https://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/ (accessed March 2020).

  26. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center, Global Roads Open Access Dataset v1, https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/groads-global-roads-open-access-v1 (accessed August 2020).

  27. Natural Earth, 1:10m Railroads, https://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/ (accessed March 2020).

  28. International Union for Conservation of Nature, The World Database on Protected Areas, https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/the-matic-areas/wdpa (accessed May 2020).

  29. World Resources Institute, Global Power Plant Database, https://datasets.wri.org/dataset/globalpowerplantdatabase (accessed October 2020).

  30. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center, Global Reservoir and Dam v1.3, https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/grand-v1-dams-rev01 (accessed August 2020).

  31. Natural Earth, 1:10m Coastline, https://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/ (accessed March 2020).

  32. H. J. Herzog and H. Javedan, Development of a Carbon Management Geographic Information System (GIS) for The United States, Massachusetts Institutes of Technology, Energy Laboratory (2010).

  33. R. S. C. Barone, D. Y. Sonoda, E. K. Lorenz and J. E. P. Cyrino, Sci. Agric., 75, 184 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. D. W. Keith, G. Holmes, D. S. Angelo and K. Heidel, Joule, 2, 1573 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. H. Azarabadi and K. S. Lackner, Appl. Energy, 250, 959 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. H. Alishah Aratboni, N. Rafiei, R. Garcia-Granados, A. Alemzadeh and J. R. Morones-Ramírez, Microb. Cell Factories, 18, 178 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. R. S. Gour, V. K. Garlapati and A. Kant, Curr. Microbiol., 77, 779 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This works was supported by the Carbon-to-X (C2X) R&D project (project no. 2020M3H7A1096361) sponsored by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of the Ministry of Science and ICT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay Hyung Lee.

Additional information

Supporting Information

Additional information as noted in the text. This information is available via the Internet at http://www.springer.com/chemistry/journal/11814.

Supporting Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, S., Realff, M.J., Yuan, Y. et al. Global evaluation of economics of microalgae-based biofuel supply chain using GIS-based framework. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 39, 1524–1541 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-021-1053-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-021-1053-4

Keywords

Navigation