Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of a mitigation system for leakage accidents using mathematical modeling

  • Process Systems Engineering, Process Safety
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chemical accidents generated during maintenance, repair, and normal operation, such as dispersion, fire, and explosions, can cause massive losses within and outside workplaces. Since a 2012 hydro fluorine leak in Gumi, South Korea, many studies have investigated mitigation systems for reducing accident impact. However, due to potential costs, and lack time and expertise, most companies have hesitated to install mitigation systems without accurate impact evaluations. Therefore, it is essential to analyze mitigation system efficacy under various possible accident scenarios. We considered a mitigation system incorporating a reserve vessel installed next to a storage vessel. When a leakage accident occurs, the chemical in the main vessel is transferred to the reserve vessel by a pump. Simulation results based on Torricellis’ theorem indicate that this mitigation system could significantly reduce leakage, and reduce leakage consequences in terms of maximum diffusion distance and hazardous gas concentrations based on consequence analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Meysami, T. Ebadi, H. Zohdirad and M. Minepur, J. Loss. Prevent. Proc., 26, 1407 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. J. Parker, The Flixborough Disaster. Report of the Court of Inquiry, Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. J. Assael and K. E. Kakosimos, Fires, explosions, and toxic gas dispersions: effects calculation and risk analysis, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, New York, U. S. A. (2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. M. A. Rana, Y. Guo and M. S. Mannan, J. Loss. Prevent. Proc., 23, 77 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. McQuaid and R. D. Fitzpatrick, North Western branch paper, Inst. Chem. E. (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. McQuaid and R. D. Fitzpatrick, J. Occup. Accid., 5, 121 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Moodie, Process Saf. Prog., 4, 234 (1985).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. A. Suardin, R. Qi, B. R. Cormier, M. Rana and Y. Zhang, J. Loss. Prevent. Proc., 24, 63 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. V. Busini and R. Rota, J. Loss. Prevent. Proc., 29, 13 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Liu and J. Wei, J. Loss. Prevent. Proc., 48, 14 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. R. Swain, J. Shriber and M. N. Swain, Energy Fuels, 12, 1 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. US Environment Protection Agency, Federal Emergency Management Agency, and US Department of Transportation, Technical guidance for hazard analysis - emergency planning for extremely hazardous substances, U. S. A. (1987).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Jun Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, K.O., Park, J.Y. & Lee, C.J. Evaluation of a mitigation system for leakage accidents using mathematical modeling. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 35, 348–354 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-017-0288-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-017-0288-6

Keywords

Navigation