Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of physically mixed and separated MgO and WO3/SiO2 catalyst for propylene production via 1-butene metathesis

  • Catalysis, Reaction Engineering
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the catalyst bed design of MgO and WO3/SiO2 for production of propylene via metathesis of 1-butene. WO3/SiO2 was used as a bi-functional catalyst for isomerization and metathesis reactions. Addition of MgO was proposed to help improve the isomerization activity and hence the propylene yield. Experimental studies were carried out to determine activity and reaction kinetics of 1-butene isomerization over MgO isomerization catalyst and 1-butene metathesis over WO3/SiO2 bi-functional catalyst for designing a suitable catalyst bed. Two types of catalyst bed arrangement—physically mixed bed and separated bed—were considered and compared by computer simulation. The simulations reveal that adding MgO in the separated bed by packing MgO before WO3/SiO2 offers superior propylene yield to the physically mixed bed. The appropriate %MgO loading in catalyst bed which offers a maximum propylene yield was found to vary (3 and 23%), depending on operating condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Z. Nawaz, X. Tang, Q. Zhang, D. Wang and W. Fei, Catal. Commun., 10, 1925 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Towfighi, A. Niaei, R. Karimzadeh and G. Saedi, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 23, 8 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Eisenacher and A.A. Adesina, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 17, 71 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. R. M. Venner and S. I. Kantorowicz, Petroleum Technology Quarterly., 6, 141 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Taoufik, E. Le Roux, J. Thivolle-Cazat and J.-M. Basset, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 46, 7202 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. C. Mol, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 213, 39 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. K. J. Ivin and J.C. Mol, Olefin Metathesis and Metathesis Polymerization, Academic Press, London (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. J. Connon and S. Blechert, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 42, 1900 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. C. P. Amigues, D. Commereuc, C. C. Lai, Y. H. Liu, J. M. Pan, Hydrocarb Process., 69, 79 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Cosyns, J. Chodorge, D. Commereuc and B. Torck, Hydrocarb Process., 77, 61 (1998).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. G. G. Podrebarac, US Patent, 6,583,329 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.B. Halsey and S.T. Coleman, US Patents, 20,090,203,950 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Phongsawat, B. Netivorruksa, K. Suriye, S. Dokjampa, P. Praserthdam and J. Panpranot, J. Nat. Gas Chem., 21, 83 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. S. Bureau, China statistical yearbook 2014, China Statistical Press, Beijing (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. W.H. Meyer, M. M.D. Radebe, D.W. Serfontein, U. Ramdhani, M. d. Toit and C. P. Nicolaides, Appl. Catal., A, 340, 236 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Liu, L. Zhang, X. Li, S. Huang, S. Liu, W. Xin, S. Xie and L. Xu, J. Nat. Gas Chem., 18, 331 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. E.A. Lombardo, W. C. Conner Jr., R. J. Madon, W. K. Hall, V.V. Kharlamov and K.M. Minachev, J. Catal., 53, 135 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Goldwasser and W.K. Hall, J. Catal., 71, 53 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. M.A. Aramendia, J. A. Benitez, V. Borau, C. Jimenez, J. M. Marinas, J.R. Ruiz and F. Urbano, Langmuir, 15, 1192 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Spamer, T. I. Dube, D. J. Moodley, C. van Schalkwyk and J. M. Botha, Appl. Catal., A, 255, 133 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. R. L. Banks, D. S. Banaslak, P. S. Hudson and J.R. Norell, J. Mol. Catal., 15, 21 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. G.C. Bailey, Catal. Rev., 3, 37 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. E. L.G. Oliveira, C. A. Grande and A. E. Rodrigues, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 87, 945 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. M.M. Hossain and H. I. de Lasa, AIChE J., 53, 1817 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. H. S. Fogler, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Princeton Hall International, New Jersey (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  26. T. I. Bhuiyan, P. Arudra, M.M. Hossain, M. N. Akhtar, A.M. Aitani, R.H. Abudawoud and S. S. Al-Khattaf, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 92, 1271 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. D. Hua, S.-L. Chen, G. Yuan, Y. Wang, Q. Zhao, X. Wang and B. Fu, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 143, 320 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suttichai Assabumrungrat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kasempremchit, N., Praserthdam, P. & Assabumrungrat, S. Comparison of physically mixed and separated MgO and WO3/SiO2 catalyst for propylene production via 1-butene metathesis. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 33, 2842–2848 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0134-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0134-2

Keywords

Navigation