Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation-based optimization of gas condensate wells to mitigate the heavy hydrocarbon condensation through supercritical CO2 injection

  • Catalysis, Reaction Engineering
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

−In gas-condensate reservoirs suffering from condensate banking, the supercritical CO2 injection process is regarded as one of the most effective technical remedies to reduce the liquid formation and achieve higher quality gas production. With proper well configuration and spacing designs, the injected CO2 can decrease the loss of heavy components effectively. The main goal of this study was to minimize the loss of heavy components during CO2 injection by implementing a proper well configuration. The results show that the integration of pressure maintenance and chemical reactions, including reduced viscosity and interfacial tension, improves the C7+ component recovery by 42.9, 49.4, and 49.3% for the base five-spot, inverted five-spot, and line drive cases, respectively. The total recovery is the highest for the line drive pattern with a recovery factor of 72.7%. The results also indicate that there is a critical length maximizing the effect of gas cycling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. H. Yousefi, A. Eslamian and F. Rashidi, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 31, 1 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. S. Barnum, F. P. Brinkman, T.W. Richardson and A.G. Spillette, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, October 22-25 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. W.W. P. Wang, M. Delshad, C. Wang, G. A. Pope and M. M. Sharma, SPE Asia Pacific Conference on Integrated Modelling for Asset Management, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, March 23-24 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.K. Ali, P. J. McGauley and C. J. Wilson, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, October 5-8 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Mahbub, M.Y. Al-Qahtani and R. Zillur, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, September 29-October 2 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. M. M. Smits, N. Van der Post and S. M. Al Shaidi, SPE Middle East Oil Show, Bahrain, March 17-20 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. A. Al-Anazi, J.R. Solares and M. Al-Faifi, SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, April 5-7 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Shi, R. N. Horne and K. Li, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, September 24-27 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Kamath, J. Petroleum Technol., 59, 04, 94 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. S. Al-Abri and R. Amin, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, October 4-7 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Kurdi, J. Xiao and J. Liu, SPE Saudi Arabia section Young Professionals Technical Symposium, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, March 19-21 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A.A. Zick, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, October 5-8 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Moradi, J. Tangsirifard, M.R. Rasaei, A.M. Maklavani and M.B. Bagheri, Trinidad and Tobago Energy Conference, Port of Spain, Trinidad, June 27-30 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Gachuz-Muro, B. Gonzalez-Valtierra, E. Luna-Rojero, B. Aguilar-Lopez and A. Pineda-Munoz, SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, July 19-21 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Soroush, L. Hoier and J. Kleppe, 18 th SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, April 14-18 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Taheri, EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, London, United Kingdom, June 10-13 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Liu, International Oil Conference and Exhibition, Veracruz, Mexico, June 27-30 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  18. D.Y. Peng and D.B. Robinson, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry: Fundamentals, 15, 59 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Sugden, J. Chem. Soc., 125, 1177 (1924).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. C.H. Whitson and M.R. Brulé, Phase Behavior, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc. (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.A. Jossi, L. I. Stiel and G. Thodos, American Institute Chem. Engineers J., 8, 1 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. N.C. Izuwa and B. Obah, SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Lagos, Nigeria, August 5-7 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.A. Heidemann and A.M. Khalil, American Institute Chem. Engineers J., 26, 05, 769 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. M.A. Sayed and G. A. Al-Muntasheri, SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, February 26-28 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  25. L. Fan, B.W. Harris, A. Jamaluddin, J. Kamath, R. Mott, G. Pope, A. A. Shandrygin and C.H. Whitson, Oilfield Review, 17, 04, 14 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Khanal, M. Khoshghadam and W. J. Lee, SPE Liquids-Rich Basins Conference, Midland, Texas, September 2-3 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. V. Sahai, G. Jackson, R. Rai and L. Coble, Americas Unconventional Resources Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 5-7 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. F. Lalehrokh and J. Bouma, SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, September 30-October 2 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kun Sang Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, J., Choi, B., Lee, J. et al. Simulation-based optimization of gas condensate wells to mitigate the heavy hydrocarbon condensation through supercritical CO2 injection. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 33, 2308–2318 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0075-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0075-9

Keywords

Navigation