Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of 2,4-D removal via activated carbon from pomegranate husk/polymer composite hydrogel: Optimization of process parameters through face centered composite design

  • Separation Technology, Thermodynamics
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new type of polymer composite hydrogel was prepared by introducing activated carbons from pomegranate husk into poly ((2-dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate) network. The removal of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) from aqueous solution was studied with respect to pH of the media, initial 2,4-D concentration and activated carbon content into the polymeric network. Face centered composite design (FCCD) through response surface methodology (RSM) was used for designing the experiments as well as for studying the effects of the process parameters. A quadratic model and a two factor interaction design model were developed for the removal of 2,4-D and adsorption capacity, respectively. The optimum pH of the pesticide solution, activated carbon content into the polymeric network and initial concentration of 2,4-D were found as 3, 2.5 wt% and 100mg/L. 63.245% and 68.805 (mg/g) for the removal of 2,4-D and adsorption capacity were obtained by using Simplex optimization method. Furthermore, the surface characteristics of the adsorbent prepared under optimized conditions were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. K. Gupta, I. Ali and V. K. Suhas Saini, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 299, 556 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. D. J. Lapworth, N. Baran, M. E. Stuart and R. S. Ward, Environ. Pollut., 163, 287 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Agrawall, R. S. Pandey and B. Sharma, Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2, 432 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K.R. Munkittrick, M.R. Servos, J. L. Parrott, V. Martin, J. H. Carey, P.A. Flett, G. Potashnik and A. Porath, J. Occup. Env. Med., 37, 1287 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Q. Wang, J. Li, Y. Song and X. Wang, Chem. Asian J., 8, 225 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Zhao, L. Jiang, Y. He, J. Li, H. Dong, X. Wang and W. Hu, Adv. Mater., 23, 3959 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Sun, S. Yang, G. Zhao, Q. Wang and X. Wang, Chem. Asian J., 8, 2755 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. B. H. Hameed, J. M. Salman and A. L. Ahmad, J. Hazard. Mater., 163, 121 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. M. Salman and B. H. Hameed, Desalination, 256, 129 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Piera, J.C. Calpe, E. Brillas, X. Domènech and J. Peral, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 27, 169 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Brillas, J. C. Calpe and J. Casado, Water Res., 34, 2253 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Zipper, C. Bolliger, T. Fleischmann, M. J-F. Suter, W. Angst, M.D. Müller and H.-P. E. Kohler, Biodegradation, 10, 271 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. L. Ahmad, L. S. Tan and S. R. A. Shukor, J. Hazard. Mater., 151, 71 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Z. Aksu and E. Kabasakal, J. Environ. Sci. Health B., 40, 545 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J.M. Salman and K. A. Al-Saad, Int. J. Chem. Sci., 10, 677 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. V.K. Gupta, A. Mittal, V. Gajbe and J. Mittal, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45, 1446 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. B. H. Hameed and A. A. Rahman, J. Hazard. Mater., 160, 576 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Kumar and R. Tamilarasan, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 58, 517 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. U.K. Garg, M.P. Kaur, V. K. Garg and D. Sud, Bioresour. Technol., 99,1325 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. N. Seeram, R. Lee, M. Hardy and D. Heber, Sep. Purif. Technol., 41, 49 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. G. Kyriakopoulosa, D. Doulia and E. Anagnostopoulos, Chem. Eng. Sci., 60, 1177 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. C.-F. Chang, C.-Y. Chang, K.-E. Hsu and S.-C. Lee, W. Höll, J. Hazard. Mater., 155, 295 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. E. Bojemueller, A. Nennemann and G. Lagaly, Appl. Clay. Sci., 18, 277 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Liu, Y. Zheng and A. Wang, J. Env. Sci., 22, 486 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Dalaran, S. Emik, G. Güçlü, T.B. Iyim and S. Özgümüs, Poly. Bull., 63, 159 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. H. Tokuyama and N. Ishihara, React Funct Polym., 70, 610 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. A. S. Franca, L. S. Oliveira, A. A. Nunes, C. C. O. Alves, Bioresour. Technol., 101, 1068 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. M. Mahramanlioglu, I. Kizilcikli, I.Ö. Biçer and M. Tunçay, J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part B, 35, 187 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. D. C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 4th Ed., John Wiley and Sons. New York, NY (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. Neter, M. H. Kutner, C.J. Nachtsheim and W. Wasserman, Applied Linear Statistical Models, (4th Ed.) McGraw-Hill, Chicago (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Q. Beg, V. Sahai and R. Gupta, Process Biochem., 39, 203 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. I. Pavlovic, C. Barriga, M. C. Hermosín, J. Cornejo and M. A. Ulibarri, Appl. Clay. Sci., 30, 125 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. U.-B. Cheah, R. C. Kirkwoodb and K.-Y. Luma, Pestic. Sci., 50, 53 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. G.M. Walker, L. Hansen, J.-A. Hanna and S. J. Allen, Water Res., 37, 2081 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Z. Aksu and E. Kabasakal, Sep. Purif. Technol., 35, 223 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. N. K. Amin, J. Hazard. Mater., 165, 52 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. P.A. Kavakli, Z. Yilmaz and M. Sen, Sep. Sci., 42, 1245 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. S. Zhu, N. Yang and D. Zhang, Mater. Chem. Phys., 113, 784 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. S. J. Kim, T.Y. Kim, S. J. Kim and S.Y. Cho, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 19, 1050 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. S. Deng, R. Ma, Q. Yu, J. Huang and G. Yu, J. Hazard. Mater., 165, 408 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Y. Qui, X. Xiao, H. Cheng, Z. Zhou and G.D. Sheng, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 4973 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeynep İlbay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taktak, F., İlbay, Z. & Şahin, S. Evaluation of 2,4-D removal via activated carbon from pomegranate husk/polymer composite hydrogel: Optimization of process parameters through face centered composite design. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 32, 1879–1888 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-015-0010-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-015-0010-5

Keywords

Navigation