Skip to main content
Log in

Constructing a unique two-phase compressibility factor model for lean gas condensates

  • Separation Technology, Thermodynamics
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Generating a reliable experimental model for two-phase compressibility factor in lean gas condensate reservoirs has always been demanding, but it was neglected due to lack of required experimental data. This study presents the main results of constructing the first two-phase compressibility factor model that is completely valid for Iranian lean gas condensate reservoirs. Based on a wide range of experimental data bank for Iranian lean gas condensate reservoirs, a unique two-phase compressibility factor model was generated using design of experiments (DOE) method and neural network technique (ANN). Using DOE, a swift cubic response surface model was generated for two-phase compressibility factor as a function of some selected fluid parameters for lean gas condensate fluids. The proposed DOE and ANN models were finally validated using four new independent data series. The results showed that there is a good agreement between experimental data and the proposed models. In the end, a detailed comparison was made between the results of proposed models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. M. Elsharkawy, Y. S.K. S. Hashem and A. Abbas, Compressibility factor for gas condensates, Alikhan Kuwait University, Paper SPE 59702 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. E. Arthur, Essien Consulting Engineers Ltd., China, H. S, Material Balance Modeling and Performance Prediction of a Composite Gas Reservoir, AEC Oil & Gas Co., and, K.O. Temeng, Mobil E&P Services Co, Paper SPE 26194 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elsharkawy, Adel M., MB Solution for High Pressure Gas Reservoirs, Petroleum Engineering Department-Kuwait University, Paper SPE 35589-MS (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elsharkawy, Adel M. and Salah G. Foda, EOS simulation and GRNN modeling of the behavior of retrograde-gas condensate reservoirs, Kuwait University, Paper SPE 38855 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D.G. Rayes, L. D. Piper, W. D. McCain, Jr. and S.W. Poston, Twophase compressibility factors for retrograde gases; SPE Formation Evaluation, 87 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. P. Sutton, Compressibility factors for high-molecular-weight reservoir gases, in 60th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineering, Las Vegas, September (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. O. A. Osborne, Oil Gas J., 28, 80 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Mohaghegh, R. Arefi, S. Ameri, K. Aminiand and R. Nutter, J. Petroleum Sci. Eng., 16(4), 263 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. C.D. Zhou, X. L. Wu and J. A. Cheng, Determining reservoir properties in reservoir studies using a fuzzy neural network, in 68th Ann. Tech. Meeting, Houston (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. A. Arehart, Drill bit diagnosis using neural networks, in Artificial Intelligence in Exploration and Production, Texas A&M (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. J. Epping and G. Nitters, Neural network for analysis and improvement of gas well production, in Computer Simulation Conf, Calgary (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. F. Briones, G. A. Rojas, J.A. Moreno and E.R. Martinez, Application of neural network in the prediction of reservoir hydrocarbon mixture composition from production data, in 69th Ann. Tech. Meeting, New Orleans (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. A. Habiballah, R. A. Starzman and M. A. Barrufet, Use of neural networks for prediction of vapor/liquid equilibrium K-values for light-hydrocarbon mixtures, SPE Reservoir Engineering, 121 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R.B. Gharibi and A. M. Elsharkawy Universal neural network based model for estimating the PVT properties of crude oil systems, in Asia Pacific Conf., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. W. Al-Kaabi and J. W. Lee, An artificial neural network approach to identify the well test interpretation model, in 65th Ann. Tech. Meeting, New Orleans (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. I.R. Juniardi and I. Ershaghi, Complexities of using neural network in well test analysis of faulted reservoir, in West Reg. Meeting, Alaska (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A.O. Kumoluyi, T. S. Daltaban and J. S. Archer, Identification of well test models using high order neural networks, in European Comp. Conf., SPE 27558, Aberdeen (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. Sung, I. Yoo, S. Ra and H. Park, Development of the HT-BP Neural Network System for the Identification of a Well-Test Interpretation Model, SPE Computer Applications (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Accarian and R. Desbrandes, Neuro-computing help pore pressure determination, Pet. Eng. Int., (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Anderson, Design of Experiments, American Institute of Physics (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  21. I. E. Lagaris, A. Likas and D. I. Fotiadis, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 9(5), 987 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. O. A. Osborne, Oil Gas J., 28, 80 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmood Moayyedi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moayyedi, M., Azamifard, A., Gharesheikhlou, A. et al. Constructing a unique two-phase compressibility factor model for lean gas condensates. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 32, 323–327 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-014-0233-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-014-0233-x

Keywords

Navigation