Skip to main content
Log in

Design and analysis of multi-stage expander processes for liquefying natural gas

  • Process Systems Engineering, Process Safety
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multi-stage expander refrigeration cycles were proposed and analyzed in order to develop an efficient natural gas liquefaction process. The proposed dual and cascade expander processes have high efficiency and the potential for larger liquefaction capacity and are suitable for small-scale and offshore natural gas liquefaction systems. While refrigeration cycles of conventional expander processes use pure nitrogen or methane as a refrigerant, the proposed refrigeration cycles use one or more mixtures as refrigerants. Since mixed refrigerants are used, the efficiency of the proposed multi-stage expander processes becomes higher than that of conventional expander processes. However, the proposed liquefaction processes are different from the single mixed refrigerant (SMR) and dual mixed refrigerant (DMR) processes. The proposed processes use mixed refrigerants as a form of gas, while the SMR and DMR processes use mixed refrigerants as a form of gas, liquid- or two-phase flow. Thus, expanders can be employed instead of Joule-Thomson (J-T) valves for refrigerant expansion. Expanders generate useful work, which is supplied to the compressor, while the high-pressure refrigerant is expanded in expanders to reduce its temperature. Various expander refrigeration cycles are presented to confirm their feasibility and estimate the performance of the proposed process. The specific work, composite curves and exergy analysis data are investigated to evaluate the performance of the proposed processes. A lower specific work was achieved to 1,590 kJ/kg in the dual expander process, and 1,460 kJ/kg in the cascade expander process. In addition, the results of exergy analysis revealed that cycle compressors with associated after-coolers and companders are main contributors to total exergy losses in proposed expander processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The outlook for energy: A view to 2040, Exxon Mobil (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Kumar, H. T. Kwon, K. H. Choi, J.H. Cho, W. Lim and I. Moon, Energy Policy, 39, 4097 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Kumar, H. T. Kwon, K. H. Choi, W. Lim, J. H. Cho, K. Tak and I. Moon, Appl. Energy, 88, 4264 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Lim, K. Choi and I. Moon, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52, 3065 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. J. Roberts and R. Agrawal, US Patent, 6,308,531 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Boutelant, OAPEC-IFP Joint Seminar, Rueil-Malmaison, France (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. M. v. d. Graaf and B. Pek, Business Briefing: LNG Review (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P.-Y. Martin, J. Pigourier and B. Fischer, Hydrocarb. Engineering (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. L. Andress, Phillips Petroleum Company (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. J. Vink and R. K. Nagelvoort, 12th International Conference and Exhibition on Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG-12), Perth, Australia (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. J. Finn, G. L. Johnson and T. R. Tomlinson, 79th Annual GPA Convention, GPA, Atlanta, USA (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. J. Finn, 81st Annual GPA Convention, Dallas, USA (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. H. Foglietta, AIChE Spring National Meeting, New Orleans, USA (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. H. Foglietta, Hydrocarb. Process (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C.W. Remeljej and A. F. A. Hoadley, Energy, 31, 2005 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Barclay and N. Denton, LNG Journal (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  17. The Kryopak EXP LNG process, Kryopak (2012).

  18. Small scale and MiniLNG systems for LNG production and emission recovery, Hamworthy (2012).

  19. I. B. Waldmann, Tekna Conference (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. E. Susan Walther, International Gas Union Research Conference, Paris, France (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. A. Gaggioli, Int. J. Appl. Thermodynam., 1, 1 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  22. I. b. Dincer and M. Rosen, Elsevier, Boston (2007).

  23. M. Kanoglu, I. Dincer and M. A. Rosen, Int. J. Energy Res., 32, 35 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Kanoglu, Int. J. Energy Res., 26, 763 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. G. Venkatarathnam and K. D. Timmerhaus, Springer, New York (2008).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Il Moon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lim, W., Lee, I., Lee, K. et al. Design and analysis of multi-stage expander processes for liquefying natural gas. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 31, 1522–1531 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-014-0098-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-014-0098-z

Keywords

Navigation