Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of size-resolved aerosol components using proton induced X-ray emission, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry and ion chromatography

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Size-resolved aerosol monitoring for PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 was performed to qualify and quantify the elements and ions by using proton induced X-ray emission (PIXE), inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), and ion chromatography (IC) analysis. Time-resolved aerosol samplings based on 2-hour and 14-hour intervals were carried out during daytime and nighttime, respectively. Physical and chemical properties of size-resolved aerosols were investigated to characterize air quality in the national park area of Gyeongju, Korea. The PIXE and ICPOES methods made elemental mass of Al, Si, S, K, Ca, Ti, Cr, Fe, Sr, and Pb. And ions of Na+, NH4 +, Ca2+, Cl, NO 3 , and SO 2−4 were analyzed by the IC method. The mass concentrations of Si, S, Ti, and Pb determined by PIXE showed relatively good correlation with those determined by ICP-OES. But Fe and Sr had worse correlations with an average R2 of 0.4703 and 0.4825, respectively. The PIXE method was a good alternative to measure chemical species of Al, Si, S, K, Ca, Ti, Cr, and Pb for size-resolved aerosols except Fe and Sr in this study. The average relative errors of sizeresolved elements for 2-hour and 14-hour interval collections were 10.1±5.7% (0.1–28.3%) and 9.9±7.7% (1.3–38.4%). Ammonium sulfates (AS), mineral dust (MD), and sea salt (SS) aerosols were reconstructed from the elements determined by PIXE and ICP-OES and ions obtained by IC. The mass concentration of MD was calculated with crustal elements of Al, Si, Ca, Ti, and Fe, which are associated with soil erosion. The average relative error of MD was the lowest value of 0.8% in the PM10 regime and the highest value of 10.0% in the PM1.0 regime. The average relative errors of AS for PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 determined by PIXE, ICP-OES, and IC showed relatively lower values of 0.8–5.7%, 1.7–5.9%, and 3.3–8.3%, respectively. The average mass concentrations of AS, MD, and SS of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 except submicron SS determined by PIXE were comparable to those determined by ICP-OES and IC within the acceptable relative errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. H. Schroeder, M. Dobson, D.M. Kane and N. D. Johnson, JAPCA, 37, 1267 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. K.W. Kim, JKPS, 59(1), 189 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Lesins, P. Chylek and U. Lohmann, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4094 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D.D. Cohen, E. Stelcer and D. Garton, Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. B, 190, 466 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Menzel, P. Schramel and K. Wittmaack, Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. B, 189, 94 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Salcedo, A. Laskin, V. Shutthanandan and J. L. Jimenez, Aerosol. Sci. Technol., 46, 1187 (2012).0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Saitoh, K. Sera, T. Gotoh and M. Nakamura, Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. B, 189, 86 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. K.W. Kim, Y. J. Kim and M. Youn, JKPS, 52(4), 1143 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. National Institute of Standards & Technology, Certificate of Analysis, Standard Reference Material 1648, Urban Prticulate Matter, National Institute of Standards & Technology (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Beaulieu, Z. Nejedly, J. L. Campbell, G. C. Edwards and G. M. Dias, Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. B, 189, 289 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. C. Freitas, S. M. Almeida, M. A. Reis and O. R. Oliveira, Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. A, 505, 430 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Pozzer, P. Zimmermann, U.M. Doering, J. van Aardenne, H. Tost, F. Dentener, G. Janssens-Maenhout and J. Lelieveld, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6915 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. W.C. Malm, K. A. Gebhart, J.V. Molenar, T.A. Cahill, R. A. Eldred and D. Huffman, Atmos. Environ., 28, 347 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Artaxo, M. L. C. Rabello, W. Maenhaut and R. van Grieken, Tellus, 44B, 318 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. B. Guinot, H. Cachier and K. Oikonomou, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1657 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Pitchford, W. Malm, B. Schichtel, N. Kumar, D. Lowenthal and J. Hand, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 57(11), 1326 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyung Won Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, K.W. Characterization of size-resolved aerosol components using proton induced X-ray emission, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry and ion chromatography. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 30, 1436–1442 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0059-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0059-y

Key words

Navigation