Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of chemical accident database: Considerations, accident trend analysis and suggestions

  • Process Systems Engineering, Process Safety
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Traditionally, regulations, standards, codes and management systems were established after major accidents such as Seveso Directive by Seveso accident, Italy, in 1976, etc. Also, several chemical material and process accident databases were developed and implicated in the world. In this paper, we introduce a set of recently developed databases, such as eMARS (EC), HSEES (USA) and PEC-SAFER (Japan), and describe current development of a chemical accident tracking system in Korea. Especially, we intensively focused on general classification codes, simplified and effective database structure, user friendly interface and intuitional searching methods. Additionally, the chemical accident trends were analyzed by using third grade of accident casualties and property’s loss. Finally, suggestions for applicability improvement of database are proposed. To improve the management and operability of hazardous materials and chemical processes, the systemic approaches are essential using accident database. The developed database and suggested issues in this study can perform an important function in the chemical industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Inherent safer chemical process: A life cycle approach, second edition, Wiley & Son, Inc. (2009).

  2. David T. Allen and David R. Shonnard, Green engineering: Environmentally conscious design of chemical processes, Prentice-Hall Inc. (2002).

  3. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Guideline for chemical process quantitative risk analysis, second edition, American Institute of Chemical Engineering (2000).

  4. D. A. Crowl and J. F. Louvar, Chemical process safety: Fundamentals with applications, second edition, Prentice-Hall Inc. (2002).

  5. K. S. Han, W. So, S. J. Choi, N. Jang, Y. Yoon and E. S. Yoon, Proc. of World Conference on Safety of Oil & Gas Industry, 654–671, College Station, USA (2008).

  6. N. Jang, K. Han, J. Koo, Y. Yoon, J. Yong and E. S. Yoon, J. Chem. Eng. Jap., 42(10), 742 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Division of Health Studies, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Hazardous Substances Emergency Events Surveillance (HSEES) Protocol (2004).

  8. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entity-relationship_model.

  9. F. E. Bird and G. L. Germain, Practical loss control leadership, New York: American Management Associations, Inc. (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. S. Park and J.Y. Kim, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 18(3), 285 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to En Sup Yoon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jang, N., Koo, J., Shin, D. et al. Development of chemical accident database: Considerations, accident trend analysis and suggestions. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 29, 36–41 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-011-0149-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-011-0149-7

Key words

Navigation