Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of various settling velocity functions and non-Newtonian fluid models in circular secondary clarifiers

  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An axisymmetric single-phase model that predicts the sedimentation of activated sludge in a circular secondaryclarifier is developed. The k-ɛ turbulence model is used on a two-dimensional, orthogonal and stepwise grid. The concentration equation, which is extended to incorporate the sedimentation of activated sludge in the field of gravity, governs the mass transfer in the clarifier. The computational domain includes the sludge blanket where the viscosity is affected by the rheological behavior of the sludge. Results in case of non-Newtonian fluid model are compared with another numerical approach provided by Lakehal et al. Non-Newtonian fluid models—Bingham, Casson, and Herschel-Bulkley—are used. The influence of settling velocity functions and non-Newtonian models on the flow behavior isinvestigated. Finally, the best models are introduced and the ways that the non-Newtonian model introduces the plastic viscosity are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. DeClercq, Computational fluid dynamics of settling tanks: Development of experiments and rheological, settling and scraper sub models, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ghent (2003).

  2. L. Szalai, P. Krebs and W. Rodi, J. Hydraulic Eng., 120, 4 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Deininger, E. Holthausen and P. A. Wilderer, J. Water Res., 32, 2951 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Lakehal, P. Krebs, J. Krijgsman and W. Rodi, J. Hydraulic Eng., 125, 253 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. A. McCorquodale, E. J. La Motta, A. Griborio, D. Homes and I. Georgiou, Development of software for modeling activated sludge clarifier systems, A Technology Transfer Report, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New Orleans, LA 70148 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Weiss, B. Plósz, K. Essemiani and J. Meinhold, J. Chem. Eng., 132, 1 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.A. McCorquodale, A. Griborio, J. Li, H. Horneck and N. Biswas, J. Environ. Eng., 133, 263 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. N. Chun, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20, 670 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. S.W. Lee, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 9, 199 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. C. Choi and M. Garcia, J. Hydraulic Eng., 128, 55 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G.C. Vradis and A. L. Protopapas, J. Hydraulic Eng., 119, 95 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Battistoni, Pre-Treatment, Water Sci. Tech., 36, 33 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. Lotito, L. Spinosa, G. Mininni and R. Antonacci, Water Sci. Tech., 36, 79 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. D. Sanin, Water SA, 28, 207 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehrzad Shams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saffarian, M.R., Hamedi, M.H. & Shams, M. Comparison of various settling velocity functions and non-Newtonian fluid models in circular secondary clarifiers. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 27, 1497–1508 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-010-0253-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-010-0253-0

Key words

Navigation