Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 1106–1111 | Cite as

Production of pure ethanol from azeotropic solution by pressure swing adsorption



Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) is attractive for final separation in the process of water removal especially for fuel ethanol production. Despite many researches on simulation and experimental works on adsorption of water on 3A zeolite in a fixed bed, none have studied a process with the actual PSA system. The purpose of this research was to study the PSA process with two adsorbers and effects of several parameters. The research also included analysis of kinetic and thermodynamic data of ethanol-water adsorption on commercial 3A zeolites in a single fixed bed. A two-level factorial design experiment was used in this research work to preliminarily screen the influence and interaction among the factors. Effects of important parameters such as initial temperature, feed concentration and feed rate were investigated. It was proven that the Langmuir isotherm could best predict the experimental results. In the PSA pilot test, the principal factors, which had effects on the performance, were feed rate, feed concentration, adsorption pressure and the cycle time. Prediction of the process efficiency in terms of ethanol recovery and enrichment was proposed in the form of regression models. The results of the study in a fixed bed adsorber could help designing a pilot-scale PSA unit. The experiments proved to be successful in terms of producing high concentration ethanol with high percentage of ethanol recovery. With further simulation work the process could be scaled up for an industrial use.

Key words

PSA Adsorption Separation 3A Zeolites 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W. K. Choi, K. Ti, Y. K. Yeo, H. Lee, H. K. Song and B. K. Na, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20, 617 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Jain, A. S. Moharir, P. Lo and G. Wozny, Separation and Purification Technology, 33, 25 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. M. Kim and S. S. Suh, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 16, 401 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Simo, C. J. Brown and V. Hlavacek, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 31, 1635 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. J. Carmo and J. C. Gubulin, Adsorption, 8, 235 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. Pozas, R. L. Cordero, J. A. Morales, N. Travieso and R. R. Malherbe, Journal of Molecular Catalysis, 83, 145 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W.K. Teo and D. M. Ruthven, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 25, 17 (1986).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. J. Carberry, Chemical and catalytic reaction engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York (1976).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P.W. Madson and D. A. Monceaux, The alcohol textbook: Fuel ethanol production, Wiley & Sons, New York (1994).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Sowerby and B. D. Crittenden, Gas separation and Purification, 2, 77 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H.M. Kvarmsdal and T. Hertzberg, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 21, 819 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Lalik, R. Mirek, J. Rakorczy and A. Groszek, Catalysis Today, 114, 242 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Salem and B. Shebil, Chemical Engineering Journal, 74, 197 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers, Seoul, Korea 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical Technology, Faculty of ScienceChulalongkorn UniversityPatumwan, BangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations