Abstract
Uncertainty characterization has become increasingly recognized as an integral component in thematic mapping based on remotely sensed imagery, and descriptors such as percent correctly classified pixels (PCC) and Kappa coefficients of agreement have been devised as thematic accuracy metrics. However, such spatially averaged measures about accuracy neither offer hints about spatial variation in misclassification, nor are useful for quantifying error margins in derivatives, such as the areal extents of different land cover types and the land cover change statistics. Such limitations originate from the deficiency that spatial dependency is not accommodated in the conventional methods for error analysis.
Geostatistics provides a good framework for uncertainty characterization in land cover information. Methods for predicting and propagating misclassification will be described on the basis of indicator samples and covariates, such as spectrally derived posteriori probabilities. An experiment using simulated datasets was carried out to quantify the error in land cover change derived from postclassification comparison. It was found that significant biases result from applying joint probability rules assuming temporal independence between misclassifications across time, thus emphasizing the need for the stochastic simulation in error modeling. Further investigations, incorporating indicators and probabilistic data for mapping and propagating misclassification, are anticipated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Skole D, Tucker C (1993) Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: satellite data from 1978 to 1988[J]. Science, 260:1 905–1 909
DeFries R S, Townshend J R G (1994) NDVI-derived land cover classification at a global scale[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 15: 3 567–3 586
Goodchild M F (1994) Integrating GIS and remote sensing for vegetation analysis and modeling: methodological issues[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 5:615–626
Bruzzone L, Serpico B (1997) An interative technique for the detection of land-cover transitions in multitemporal remote-sensing images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 35(4): 858–867
Tso B, Mather P M (2001) Classification methods for remotely sensed data[M]. London: Taylor & Francis
Muchoney D, Strahler A (2002) Regional vegetation mapping and direct land surface parameterization from remotely sensed and site data[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(6):1 125–1 142
Coppin P, Jonckheere I, Nackaerts K, et al. (2004) Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review[ J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(9):1 565–1 596
Lambin E F, Ehrlich D (1996) The surface temperature-vegetation index space for land cover and land cover change analysis[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17: 463–487
Stehman S V, Sohl T L, Loveland T R (2003) Statistical sampling to characterize recent United States land-cover change[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86(4): 517–529
Hunsaker C T, Goodchild M F, Friedl M A, et al. (2001) Spatial uncertainty in ecology: implications for remote sensing and GIS applications[M].New York: Springer-Verlag
Foody G M (2002) Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80(1): 185–201
Zhang J, Goodchild M F (2002) Uncertainty in geographical information[M]. London and New York: Taylor & Francis
Kyriakidis P C, Zhang J (2003) A geostatistical framework for accuracy assessment of remotely sensed land-cover information[C]. Presented at Geocomputation, Southampton
Chrisman N R (1989) Modeling error in overlaid categorical maps[M]//Goodchild M F, Gopal S (eds). Accuracy of Spatial Databases. London: Taylor & Francis
Congalton R G (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37: 35–46
Steele B M, Patterson D A, Redmond R L (2003) Towards estimation of map accuracy without a probability test sample[J]. Ecological and Environmental Statistics, 10:333–356
Ripley B D (1996) Pattern recognition and neural networks[ M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Arbia G, Griffith D, Haining R P (2003) Spatial error propagation when computing linear combination of spectral bands: the case of vegetation indices[J]. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 10(3): 375–396
Journel A G, Huijbregts C J (1978) Mining geostatistics[ M]. London: Academic Press
Deutsch C V, Journel A G (1998) GSLIB: geostatistical software library and user’s guide[M]. New York: Oxford University Press
Atkinson P M (2001) Geostatistical regularization in remote sensing[M]//Tate N J, Atkinson P M (eds). Modelling Scale in Geographical Information Science. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the National 973 Program of China (No. 2006CB701302),the Hubei Department of Science and Technology (No. 2007ABA276).
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, J., Zhang, J. & Yao, N. Uncertainty characterization in remotely sensed land cover information. Geo-spat. Inf. Sci. 12, 165–171 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11806-009-0072-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11806-009-0072-9