Cavitation passive control on immersed bodies
- 67 Downloads
This paper introduces a new idea of controlling cavitation around a hydrofoil through a passive cavitation controller called artificial cavitation bubble generator (ACG). Cyclic processes, namely, growth and implosion of bubbles around an immersed body, are the main reasons for the destruction and erosion of the said body. This paper aims to create a condition in which the cavitation bubbles reach a steady-state situation and prevent the occurrence of the cyclic processes. For this purpose, the ACG is placed on the surface of an immersed body, in particular, the suction surface of a 2D hydrofoil. A simulation was performed with an implicit finite volume scheme based on a SIMPLE algorithm associated with the multiphase and cavitation model. The modified k-ε RNG turbulence model equipped with a modification of the turbulent viscosity was applied to overcome the turbulence closure problem. Numerical simulation of water flow over the hydrofoil equipped with the ACG shows that a low-pressure recirculation area is produced behind the ACG and artificially generates stationary cavitation bubbles. The location, shape, and size of this ACG are the crucial parameters in creating a proper control. Results show that the cavitation bubble is controlled well with a well-designed ACG.
Keywordsflow control artificial cavitation bubble generator cavitation bubble hydrofoil passive controller Re-entrant jet immersed bodies
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alajbegovic A, Gorger HA, Philip H, 1999. Calculation of transient cavitation in nozzle using the two-fluid model. 12th Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Indianapolis, USA.Google Scholar
- ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, Release 15.0, ANSYS, Inc. November, 2013.Google Scholar
- ANSYS Fluent User's Guide. Release 15.0. ANSYS, Inc. November, 2013.Google Scholar
- Ji B, Luo XW, Arndt RE, Peng X, Wu Y, 2015. Large eddy simulation and theoretical investigations of the transient cavitating vortical flow structure around a NACA66 hydrofoil. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 68, 121–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.10.008MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kim SE, 2009. A Numerical study of unsteady cavitation on a hydrofoil. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Cavitation, Michigan, USA, No. 56.Google Scholar
- Li DQ, Grekula M, Lindell P, 2009. A modified SST k-? turbulence model to predict the steady and unsteady sheet cavitation on 2D and 3D hydrofoils. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Cavitation, Michigan, USA, No. 107.Google Scholar
- Mostafa NE, Karim M, Sarker MA, 2012. Numerical study of unsteady behavior of partial cavitation on two dimensional hydrofoils. Journal of Shipping and Ocean Engineering, 2, 10–17.Google Scholar
- Reboud JL, Stutz B, Coutier O, 1998. Two-phase flow structure of cavitation: experiment and modelling of unsteady effects. Third International Symposium on Cavitation, Grenoble, France.Google Scholar
- Seo JH, Lele SK, 2009. Numerical investigation of cloud cavitation and cavitation noise on a hydrofoil section. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Cavitation, Michigan, USA.Google Scholar
- Wu J, Utturkar Y, Shyy W, 2003. Assessment of modeling strategies for cavitating flow around a hydrofoil. Fifth International Symposium on Cavitation (Cav2003), Osaka, No. cav03-OS-1-7, 1-4.Google Scholar