Effect of bed vicinity on vortex shedding and force coefficients of fluid flow on an offshore pipeline
- 69 Downloads
The effect of rigid bed proximity on flow parameters and hydrodynamic loads in offshore pipelines exposed to turbulent flow is investigated numerically. The Galerkin finite volume method is employed to solve the unsteady incompressible 2D Navier–Stokes equations. The large eddy simulation turbulence model is solved using the artificial compressibility method and dual time-stepping approach. The proposed algorithm is developed for a wide range of turbulent flows with Reynolds numbers of 9500 to 1.5×104. Evaluation of the developed numerical model shows that the proposed technique is capable of properly predicting hydrodynamic forces and simulating the flow pattern. The obtained results show that the lift and drag coefficients are strongly affected by the gap ratio. The mean drag coefficient slightly increases as the gap ratio increases, although the mean lift coefficient rapidly decreases. The vortex shedding suppression happen at the gap ratio of less than 0.2.
KeywordsNavier–Stokes equations artificial compressibility method dual time stepping gap ratio flat seabed offshore pipelines vortex shedding
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The authors would like to thank Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS for the funding support and facilities. This paper was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (grant number: 10053121) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MI, Korea) and by the Energy Efficiency & Resource of Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy of Korea (grant number: 2014301002-1870).
- Buresti G, Launaro F, 1980. Pressure measurements around a circular cylinder in cross flow near a plane boundary. University of Pisa, Institute of Aerodynamics, 1–101.Google Scholar
- Kiya M, 1968. Study on the turbulent shear flow past a circular cylinder. Bulletin of the Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, 50, 1–101.Google Scholar
- Lee YG, Hong SW, Kang KJ, 1994. A numerical simulation of vortex motion behind a circular cylinder above a horizontal plane boundary. The Fourth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Osaka, Japan, 428–433.Google Scholar
- Li Y, Chen B, Lai G, 1997. The numerical simulation of wave forces on seabed pipeline by three-step finite element method and large eddy simulation. The Seventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Honolulu, USA, 273–277.Google Scholar
- Namazi-Saleh F, John KV, Mustaffa ZB, 2016. Numerical evaluation of galerkin finite volume solver for laminar/turbulent flow over flat plate. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(4), 2393–2399.Google Scholar
- Roshko A, Steinolfson A, Chattoorgoon V, 1975. Flow forces on a cylinder near a wall or near another cylinder. DTIC Document.Google Scholar
- Sabbagh-Yazd R, Mastorakis N, Meysami F, Namazi-Saleh F, 2008. 2D Galerkin finite volume solution of steady inviscid/viscous/turbulent artificial compressible flow on triangular meshes. International Journal of Computers, 2(1), 39–46.Google Scholar
- Zhao X, Zhang S, Meganathan A, 2009. Implicit time accurate method for unsteady computations. 47th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Orlando, AIAA 2009-2166. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-166Google Scholar