Skip to main content
Log in

A finite volume algorithm based on overlapping meshes for simulation of hydrodynamic problems

  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Application Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A finite volume algorithm was established in order to investigate two-dimensional hydrodynamic problems. These include viscous free surface flow interaction with free rigid bodies in the case of large and/or relative motions. Two-phase flow with complex deformations at the interface was simulated using a fractional step-volume of fluid algorithm. In addition, body motions were captured by an overlapping mesh system. Here, flow variables are transferred using a simple fully implicit non-conservative interpolation scheme which maintains the second-order accuracy of implemented spatial discretisation. Code was developed and an appropriate set of problems investigated. Results show good potential for development of a virtual hydrodynamics laboratory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FERZIGER J, PERIC M. Computational methods for fluid dynamics[M]. 3rd Rev. Ed., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. UBBINK O, ISSA R I. A method for capturing sharp fluid interfaces on arbitrary meshes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1999, 153(1):26–50.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. PANAHI R, JAHANBAKHSH E, SEIF M S. Development of a VoF fractional step solver for floating body motion simulation[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2006, 28(3):171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. CHENTANEZ N, GOKTEKIN T G, FELDMAN B E, O’BRIEN J F. Simultaneous coupling of fluids and deformable bodies[C]//CANI M P and O’BRIEN J F. ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation. Vienna, Austria, 2006: 83–89.

  5. TREMEL U, SORENSEN K A, HITZEL S, RIGER H, HASSAN O. WEATHERILL N P. Parallel remeshing of unstructured volume grids for CFD applications[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2007, 53(8):1361–1379.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. BLADES E, MARCUM D L. A sliding interface method for unsteady unstructured flow simulations[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2007, 53:507–529.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. CARRICA P M, WILSON R V, NOACK R W, STERN F. Ship motions using single-phase level set with dynamic overset grids[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2007, 36(9):1415–1433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. MITTAL M, IACCARINO G. Immersed boundary methods[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2005, 37:239–261.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. JAHANBAKHCH E, PANAHI R, SEIF M S. Numerical simulation of three-dimensional interfacial flows[J]. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, 2007, 17(4):384–404.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. JASAK H. Error analysis and estimation for finite volume method with application to fluid flows[D]. London: University of London, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. RHIE CM, CHOW WL A numerical study of the turbulent flow past an isolated airfoil with trailing edge separation [J]. AIAA Journal, 1983, 21:1525–1532.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. KIM D, CHOI H. A second-order time-accurate finite volume method for unsteady incompressible flow on hybrid unstructured grids[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000, 162(2):411–428.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. TOGASHI F, NAKAHASHI K, ITO Y, IWAMIYATA T, SHIMBO Y. Flow simulation of NAL experimental supersonic airplane/booster separation using overset unstructured grids[J]. Computers and Fluids, 2001, 30(6):673–688.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. HADZIC H. Development and application of a finite volume method for the computation of flows around moving bodies on unstructured, overlapping grids[D]. Hamburg: Teschniche Universitat Hamburg-Harburg, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ATTA E H. Component adaptive grid interfacing[J]. AIAA Paper, 1981, 81–0382.

  16. BUNING P G, WONG T C, DILLEY A D, PAO J L. Prediction of hyper-x stage separation aerodynamics using CFD[J]. AIAA Paper, 2000, 2000–4009.

  17. CHEN, H C, LIN W M, HWANG W Y. Validation and application of chimera RANS method for ship-ship interactions in shallow water and restricted waterway[C]// PURTELL L P. 24th ONR Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics. Michigan: National Academy Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  18. NAKAHASHI K, TOGASHI F, SHAROV D. An intergrid-boundary definition method for overset unstructured grid approach[J]. AIAA Journal, 2000, 38(11):2077–2084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. MEAKIN R L. Object X-rays cutting holes in composite overset structured grids[J]. AIAA Paper, 2001, 2001–2537.

  20. SUHS N E, ROGERS S E, DIETZ W E. PEGASUS: An Automated pre-processor for overset grid CFD[J]. AIAA Paper, 2002, 2002–3186.

  21. LÖHNER R. Robust, vectorized search algorithms for interpolation on unstructured grids[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1995, 118(2):380–387.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. DRAKAKIS D, MAJEWSKI J, ROKICHKI J, ZOLTAK J. Investigation of blendingfunction-based overlapping-grid technique for compressible flows[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2001, 190:5173–5195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. PANAHI R, JAHANBAKHSH E, SEIF M S. Numerical investigation on the effect of baffle arrangement in tanker sloshing[C]//DELHOMMEAU G and VISONNEAU M. 9th Numerical Towing Tank Symposium (NuTTs), Nantes: Ecole Centrale de Nantes, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  24. JAHANBAKHSH E, PANAHI R, SEIF M S. Catamaran motion simulation based On moving grid technique[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2009, 17(2): 128–136.

    Google Scholar 

  25. SCHÄFER M, TUREK S. Benchmark computations of laminar flow around a cylinder[J]. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, 1996, 52:547–566.

    Google Scholar 

  26. TANIZAWA K, CLÉMENT A H. Report of the 2nd workshop of ISOPE numerical wave tank group: benchmark test cases of radiation problem[C]// CHUNG J S, FREDERKING R M W, SAEKI H and KOTERAYAMA W. 10th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference [C], Cupertino: ISOPE, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  27. PARK J C, MIYATA H. Numerical simulation of fully-nonlinear wave motions around arctic and offshore structures[J]. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 2001, 189:13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  28. GREENHOW M, LIN W. Nonlinear free surface effects: experiments and theory[R]. Report No. 83-19, Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Ocean Engineering, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  29. XING-KAEDING Y. Unified approach to ship seakeeping and maneuvering by a RANSE method[D]. Hamburg: Teschnichen Universitat Hamburg-Harburg, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Shfieefar.

Additional information

Roozbeh PANAHI was born in 1980. He is a PhD candidate at Tarbiat Modares University. His current research interests include development of a numerical wave tank.

Mehdi SHFIEEFAR was born in 1958. He is a professor at Tarbiat Modares University. His current research interests include marine hydrodynamics as well as design and analysis of coastal and offshore structures.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panahi, R., Shfieefar, M. A finite volume algorithm based on overlapping meshes for simulation of hydrodynamic problems. J. Marine. Sci. Appl. 8, 281–290 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-009-8082-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-009-8082-4

Keywords

CLC number

Navigation