Skip to main content
Log in

Risk management modeling and its application in maritime safety

  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Application Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantified risk assessment (QRA) needs mathematicization of risk theory. However, attention has been paid almost exclusively to applications of assessment methods, which has led to neglect of research into fundamental theories, such as the relationships among risk, safety, danger, and so on. In order to solve this problem, as a first step, fundamental theoretical relationships about risk and risk management were analyzed for this paper in the light of mathematics, and then illustrated with some charts. Second, man-machine-environment-management (MMEM) theory was introduced into risk theory to analyze some properties of risk. On the basis of this, a three-dimensional model of risk management was established that includes: a goal dimension; a management dimension; an operation dimension. This goal management operation (GMO) model was explained and then emphasis was laid on the discussion of the risk flowchart (operation dimension), which lays the groundwork for further study of risk management and qualitative and quantitative assessment. Next, the relationship between Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) and Risk Management was researched. This revealed that the FSA method, which the international maritime organization (IMO) is actively spreading, comes from Risk Management theory. Finally, conclusion were made about how to apply this risk management method to concrete fields efficiently and conveniently, as well as areas where further research is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SONG Mingzhe. Modern risk management[M]. Beijing: China Textile Press, 2003, 76–132(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  2. LU Na. Statistical issues in coherent risk management[D]. Raleigh: North Carolina State University, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. XUN Jinliang. Risk management[M] 2nd ed. Beijing: China Financial Publishing House, 2003, 1–2(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. IMO. Guidelines for formal safety assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process[EB/OL]. 2007-09-01. http://www.imo.org/home.asp

  5. CHEN Weijiong. Structure of the basic elements of safety science[M]// ZENG Qingxuan. Progress in Safety Science and Technology: Vol I. Beijing: Science Press, 1998: 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  6. TRIESCHMANN J S, GUSTAVSON S G, HOYT R E. Risk management and insurance[M]. 11th ed. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. WEIHRICH H, KOONTZ H. Management-A global perspective[M]. 11th ed. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2005: 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  8. DUBRIN A J. Essentials of management[M]. 6th ed. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2004, 7–8(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  9. HEAD G L, HORN S. Essentials of risk management[M]. 3rd ed. Simpsonville: Insurance Institute of America, 1997: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  10. QIN Tingrong, CHEN Weijiong, HAO Yuguo, et al. Formal safety assessment (FSA) methodology[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2005, 4: 88–92(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  11. ROSQVISTA T, TUOMINEN R. Qualification of formal safety assessment: an exploratory study[J]. Safety Science, 2004, (42): 99–120.

  12. VENTIKOS N P, PSARAFTIS H N. Spill accident modeling: a critical survey of the event-decision network in the context of IMO’s formal safety assessment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2004, 107: 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. HU Shenping, FANG Quangen, XIA Haibo, et al. Formal safety assessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2007, 92: 369–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ting-rong Qin  (秦庭荣).

Additional information

Foundation item: Supported by the Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project Foundation under Grant No. T0602, and Supported by the Shanghai Education Commission Project Foundation under Grant No. 05FZ10.

CHEN Wei-jiong was born in 1957. He is a captain, a professor and a PhD supervisor at Shanghai Maritime University. His current research interests include maritime safety, safety assessment and shipping logistic safety, etc.

QIN Ting-rong was born in 1976. He is a PhD at Shanghai Maritime University. His current research interests include safety assessment and risk assessment of maritime industry, etc.

ZENG Xiang-kun was born in 1980. He is a lecturer at Shanghai Maritime University. His current research interests include pattern recognition and digital image processing, etc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qin, Tr., Chen, Wj. & Zeng, Xk. Risk management modeling and its application in maritime safety. J. Marine. Sci. Appl. 7, 286–291 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-008-7076-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-008-7076-y

Keywords

CLC number

Navigation