Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic fragility of flexible pipeline connections in a base isolated medical building

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flexible pipelines are often used to connect hard pipes from a foundation to a superstructure to accommodate large deformation in the base isolation layer during an earthquake. Although Chinese seismic design guidelines suggest several configurations, they are different from the designs that have been proven in practice, e.g., Japanese styles, and extensive experimental investigation into their seismic performance is required. Three types of seals, rubber-, metal- and asbestine-based, were tested quasi-statically with infilled pressurized water at 2.5 MPa. The asbestine-based seal leaked at a smaller deformation than the other two types of seals. Based on the test results, three damage states were defined and the deformation capacity was estimated. To evaluate their performance, a three-dimensional model of a base-isolated medical building was developed using OpenSees, with the flexible pipelines simulated by a mechanical model calibrated from the experimental data. A probabilistic seismic demand model and the fragility function of the flexible pipelines were then developed to evaluate the seismic performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • 03SG610-1 (2003), Construction Details for Seismic Isolation Buildings, Beijing: China Planning Press. (in Chinese)

  • Ancheta T, Darragh R, Stewart J, Seyhan E, Silva W, Chiou B, Wooddell K, Graves R, Kottke A, Boore D, Kishida T, and Donahue J (2013), “PEER NGA-West2 Database,” Technical Report PEER 2013/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold C, Lyons J and Munger J (2010), Design Guide for Improving School Safety in Earthquakes, Floods, and High Winds, Risk Management Series, FEMA 424, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

  • ASCE 7–10 (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers.

  • Ayres JM and Ezer (1996), “Northridge Earthquake Hospital Water Damage Study,” Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, Sacramento, CA.

  • CECS126: 2001 (2001), Technical Specification for Seismic-Isolation with Laminated Rubber Bearing Isolators, Beijing: China Association for Engineering Construction Standardization. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Çelebi M (1996), “Successful Performance of a Base-Isolated Hospital Building during the 17 January 1994 Northridge Earthquake,” Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 5(2): 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Douglas AF (2002), “Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines,” Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), 128(4): 526–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 461 (2007), Interim Protocols for Determining Seismic Performance Characteristics of Structural and Nonstructural Components through Laboratory Testing, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

  • Fu Rong, Ye Kun and Li Shaojin (2012), “Investigation into the Seismic Isolation Coefficient of LRB Base-Isolated Structures for Structural Design,” Engineering Mechanics, 29(SI): 130–135. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • GB50011-2010 (2010), Code for Seismic Design of Buildings, Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2010. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • GB/T 14525-2010 (2010), General Specification for Corrugated Metal Hose Assemblies, Beijing: China Standards Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisham M and Yassin M (1994), “Nonlinear Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Structures under Monotonic and Cycling Loads,” PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques CC, McIntosh J, Giovinazzi S, Kirsch TD, Wilson T and Mitrani-Reiser J (2014), “Resilience of the Canterbury Hospital System to the 2011 Christchurch Earthquake,” Earthquake Spectra, 30(1): 533–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju BS (2011), “Seismic Fragility of Piping System,” PhD Dissertation, North Carolina State University.

  • Kato T, Mizuno Y and Sasaki K (2000), “An Experimental Study on Piping System with Universal Expansion Joint for Base Isolated Building,” Architectural Institute of Japan, 759–760.

  • Li Q and Ellingwood B (2008), “Damage Inspection and Vulnerability Analysis of Existing Buildings with Steel Moment-Resisting Frame,” Engineering Structures, 30(2): 338–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q and Ellingwood B (2007), “Performance Evaluation and Damage Assessment of Steel Frame Buildings under Mainshock-Aftershock Earthquake Sequence,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36(3): 405–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander JB, Priestley MJN and Park R (1988), “Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), 114(8): 1804–1826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazonni S, McKenna F, Scott MH and Fenves GL (2006), OpenSees Command Language Manual <https://doi.org/opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/manuals/usermanual>.

  • Menegotto M and Pinto P (1973), “Method of Analysis for Cyclically Loaded RC Plane Frames Including Changes in Geometry and Non-Elastic Behavior of Elements under Combined Normal Force and Bending, Symposium on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well-Defined Repeated Loads,” IABSE Reports 13, Lisbon.

  • Mizutani K, Kim H and Kikuchihara M (2012), “The Damage of the Building Equipment under the 2011 Tohoku Pacific Earthquake,” 9th International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering and 4th Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrtle RC, Masri SF, Nigbor RL and Caffrey JP (2005), “Classification and Prioritization of Essential Systems in Hospitals under Extreme Events,” Earthquake Spectra, 21(3): 779–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajaiah S and Sun XH (2000), “Response of Base-Isolated USC Hospital Building in Northridge Earthquake,” Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), 126(10): 1177–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitta Y, Mitsuru U and Junji S (1996), “A Study on Deformation Capacity of Pipes between Isolated and Non-isolated Structures,” Summaries of Technical Papers of Meeting Architectural Institute of Japan. B-2, Structures II, Structural Dynamics Nuclear Power Plants Architectural Institute of Japan, 1155–1156.

  • OpenSees Version 2.4.1 (2013), Open System for Earthquake Simulation Framework, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.

  • OpenSees (2012), Open System for Earthquake Simulation Framework, OpenSees Wiki: https://doi.org/opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page.

  • Porter K, Kennedy R and Bachman R (2007), “Creating Fragility Functions for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering,” Earthquake Spectra, 23(2): 471–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter K, Kennedy R and Bachman R (2006), “Developing Fragility Functions for Building Components for ATC-58,” ATC-58, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu Z, Kishiki S and Nakazawa T (2013), “Influence of Isolation Gap Size on the Collapse Performance of Seismically Base-Isolated Buildings,” Earthquake Spectra, 29(4): 1477–1494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares DH, Padgett JE and Paultre P (2012), “Fragility Curves of Typical as-Built Highway Bridges in Eastern Canada,” Engineering Structures, 40(7): 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timothy DA, Robert BD and Jonathan PS (2013), PEER NGA-West2 Database [DB/OL], PEER 2013, 03. https://doi.org/ngawest2.berkeley.edu/spectras/new?sourceDb_flag=1.

  • Wang Y, Xiong L and Xu W (2013), “Seismic Damage and Damage Enlightenment of Medical Buildings in Lushan M S 7.0 Earthquake,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 4(4): 44–53. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Wang T, Lin X, Qu Z and Mao C (2016), “Seismic Damages of RC Frames in Nepal M S 8.1 Earthquake,” Engineering Mechanics, 33(9): 59–68. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou F, Cui H and Shigetaka A (2012), “Inspection Report of the Disaster of the East Japan Earthquake by Sino-Japanese Joint Mission,” Building Structure, 42(4): 1–20. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was funded by Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, CEA (2016A05 and 2016A06), the International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China (2014DFA70950), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51378478), and the Program for Innovative Research Team in China Earthquake Administration. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Wang.

Additional information

Supported by: Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, CEA under Grant Nos. 2016A05 and 2016A06, the International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China under Grant No. 2014DFA70950, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51378478

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shang, Q., Wang, T. & Li, J. Seismic fragility of flexible pipeline connections in a base isolated medical building. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 18, 903–916 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0542-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0542-5

Keywords

Navigation