Abstract
The seismic performance of a self-centering precast reinforced concrete (RC) frame with shear walls was investigated in this paper. The lateral force resistance was provided by self-centering precast RC shear walls (SPCW), which utilize a combination of unbonded prestressed post-tensioned (PT) tendons and mild steel reinforcing bars for flexural resistance across base joints. The structures concentrated deformations at the bottom joints and the unbonded PT tendons provided the self-centering restoring force. A 1/3-scale model of a five-story self-centering RC frame with shear walls was designed and tested on a shake-table under a series of bi-directional earthquake excitations with increasing intensity. The acceleration response, roof displacement, inter-story drifts, residual drifts, shear force ratios, hysteresis curves, and local behaviour of the test specimen were analysed and evaluated. The results demonstrated that seismic performance of the test specimen was satisfactory in the plane of the shear wall; however, the structure sustained inter-story drift levels up to 2.45%. Negligible residual drifts were recorded after all applied earthquake excitations. Based on the shake-table test results, it is feasible to apply and popularize a self-centering precast RC frame with shear walls as a structural system in seismic regions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belleri A, Schoettler MJ, Restrepo JI and Fleischman RB (2014), “Dynamic Behaviour of Rocking and Hybrid Cantilever Walls in a Precast Concrete Building,” ACI Structural Journal, 111(3): 661–672.
Chancellor NB, Eatherton MR, Roke DA and Tuğçe A (2014), “Self-Centering Seismic Lateral Force Resisting Systems: High Performance Structures for the City of Tomorrow,” Buildings, 4(3): 520–548.
Cheok GS and Lew HS (1993), “Performance of Precast Concrete Beam-to-Column Connections Subject to Cyclic Loading,” PCI Journal, 36(3): 56–67.
Cui Y, Lu XL and Jiang C (2017), “Experimental Investigation of Tri-Axial Self-Centering Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures Through Shaking Table Tests,” Engineering Structures, 132: 684–694.
El-Sheikh MT, Sause R, Pessiki S and Lu LW (1999), “Seismic Behaviour and Design of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Frames,” PCI Journal, 44(3): 54–71.
Erkmen B and Schultz AE (2009), “Self-Centering Behaviour of Unbonded, Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Shear Walls,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 13(7): 1047–1064.
Hamid NH and Mander JB (2010), “Lateral Seismic Performance of Multipanel Precast Hollowcore Walls,” Journal Structural Engineering, 136(7): 795–804.
Holden T, Restrepo J and Mander JB (2003), “Seismic Performance of Precast Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Walls,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(3): 286–296.
Kurama YC (2005), “Seismic Design of Partially Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls,” PCI Journal, 50(4): 100–125.
Lu XL, Dang XL, Qian J, Zhou Y and Jiang HJ (2017), “Experimental Study of Self-Centering Shear Walls with Horizontal Bottom Slits,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 143(3): 04016183
Lu XL, Mao YJ, Chen Y, Liu JJ and Zhou Y (2013), “New Structural System for Earthquake Resilient Design,” Journal of Earthquake & Tsunami, 7(7): 132–141.
Marriott D, Pampanin S and Palermo A (2009), “Quasi-Static and Pseudo-Dynamic Testing of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Rocking Bridge Piers with External Replaceable Dissipaters,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 38(3): 331–354.
Mccormick J, Aburano H, Ikenaga M and Nakashima M (2008), “Permissible Residual Deformation Levels for Building Structures Considering Both Safety and Human Elements,” Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
Morgen BG and Kurama YC (2007), “Seismic Design of Friction-Damped Precast Concrete Frame Structures,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(11): 1501–1511.
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (2010), GB 50011-2010 Code for Seismic Design of Buildings, Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China. (in Chinese)
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (2012), GB 50009-2012 Load Code for the Design of Building Structures, Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China. (in Chinese)
Nagae T, Tahara K, Fukuyama K, Matsumori T, Shiohara H, Kabeyasawa T, Kono S, Nishiyama M, Moehle J, Wallace J and Ghannoum W (2012), “Test Results of Four-Story Reinforced Concrete and Post-Tensioned Concrete Buildings: The 2010 E-Defense Shaking Table Test,” Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
Perez FJ, Sause R and Pessiki S (2007), “Analytical and Experimental Lateral Load Behaviour of Unbonded Posttensioned Precast Concrete Walls,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 133: 1531–1540.
Priestley MJN, Sritharan S, Conley JR and Pampanin S (1999), “Preliminary Results and Conclusions from the PRESSS Five-Story Precast Concrete Test Building,” PCI Journal, 44(6): 42–67.
Smith BJ (2012), “Design, Analysis, and Experimental Evaluation of Hybrid Precast Concrete Shear Walls for Seismic Regions,” Indiana: University of Notre Dame.
Weng YK, Pampanin S, Palermo A and Carr AJ (2010), “Self-Centering Structural Systems with Combination of Hysteretic and Viscous Energy Dissipations,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39(10): 1083–1108.
Yang BY and Lu XL, “Displacement-Based Seismic Design Approach for Prestressed Precast Concrete Shear Walls and Its Application,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2017.1309607.
Acknowledgement
This research is sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (51638012 and 51578401). The support is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant Nos. 51638012 and 51578401
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, X., Yang, B. & Zhao, B. Shake-table testing of a self-centering precast reinforced concrete frame with shear walls. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 17, 221–233 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0436-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0436-y