Polynomial friction pendulum isolators (PFPIs) for seismic performance control of benchmark highway bridge
The seismic response of a benchmark highway bridge isolated with passive polynomial friction pendulum isolators (PFPIs) is investigated and subjected to six bidirectional ground motion records. The benchmark study is based on a lumped mass finite-element model of the 91/5 highway overcrossing located in Southern California. The PFPI system possesses two important parameters; one is horizontal flexibility and the other is energy absorbing capacity through friction. The evaluation criteria of the benchmark bridge are analyzed considering two parameters, time period of the isolator and coefficient of friction of the isolation surface. The results of the numerical study are compared with those obtained from the traditional friction pendulum system (FPS). Dual design performance of the PFPI system suppressed the displacement and acceleration response of the benchmark highway bridge. The dual design hysteresis loop of the PFPI system is the main advantage over the linear hysteresis loop of the FPS. The numerical result indicates that the seismic performance of the PFPI system is better than that of the traditional FPS isolated system. Further, it is observed that variations of the isolation time period and coefficient of friction of the FPS and PFPI systems have a significant effect on the peak responses of the benchmark highway bridge.
Keywordsbenchmark highway bridge seismic isolation FPS PFPI evaluation criteria
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Agrawal AK, et al. (2005), “Benchmark Structural Control Problem For a Seismically Excited Bridge, Part I; Problem Definition,” Available from: http://www-ce. emgr.ccny.cuny.edu/people/Agrawal, 2005 [Accessed 21 October 2014].Google Scholar
- Saha A, Saha P and Patro SK (2015), “Seismic Response Control of Benchmark Highway Bridge Using Nonlinear FV Spring Damper,” The IES Journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering, 8(4): 240–250.Google Scholar
- Saha P and Jangid RS (2008), “Comparative Performance of Isolation Systems for Benchmark Cable-stayed Bridge,” International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 6(2): 111–139.Google Scholar
- Wen YK (1976), “Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 102: 249–263.Google Scholar
- Yurchenko D (2015), “Tuned Mass and Parametric Pendulum Dampers under Seismic Vibrations,” Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg).Google Scholar