Experimental and analytical studies on multiple tuned mass dampers for seismic protection of porcelain electrical equipment
- 94 Downloads
Porcelain electrical equipment (PEE), such as current transformers, is critical to power supply systems, but its seismic performance during past earthquakes has not been satisfactory. This paper studies the seismic performance of two typical types of PEE and proposes a damping method for PEE based on multiple tuned mass dampers (MTMD). An MTMD damping device involving three mass units, named a triple tuned mass damper (TTMD), is designed and manufactured. Through shake table tests and finite element analysis, the dynamic characteristics of the PEE are studied and the effectiveness of the MTMD damping method is verified. The adverse influence of MTMD redundant mass to damping efficiency is studied and relevant equations are derived. MTMD robustness is verified through adjusting TTMD control frequencies. The damping effectiveness of TTMD, when the peak ground acceleration far exceeds the design value, is studied. Both shake table tests and finite element analysis indicate that MTMD is effective and robust in attenuating PEE seismic responses. TTMD remains effective when the PGA far exceeds the design value and when control deviations are considered.
Keywordscurrent transformer damping porcelain electrical equipment finite element analysis multiple tuned mass dampers shake table test
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Scientific Research Fund of IEM, CEA (Grant No. 2016B09, 2014B12) and China Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 51478442, 51408565). Also, the assistance provided by the technicians (Mr. Xia, Mr. Chen, Mr. Lin, Mr. Lu and Mr. He) of IEM during shake table tests is acknowledged.
- Araneda JC, Rudnick H, Mocarquer S and Miquel P (2010), “Lessons from the 2010 Chilean Earthquake and Its Impact on Electricity Supply,” 2010 International Conference on Power System Technology, Hangzhou, China, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
- Chen B, Xiao X, Li PY and Zhong WL (2015), “Performance Evaluation on Transmission Tower-line System with Passive Friction Dampers Subjected to Wind Excitations,” Shock and Vibration, 2015: 1–13.Google Scholar
- Cao MG, Cheng YF, Dai ZB, Lu ZC, Zhou FL and Tan P (2009), “Study of Seismic Performance and Damping Effects of Porcelain Column Circuit Breaker SF6,” Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2009(S1): 267–272. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Frahm H (1911), “Device for Damping Vibrations of Bodies,” US Patent 989,958.Google Scholar
- Gelfi P (2012), “SIMQKE_GR Version 2.7,” University of Brescia (Software).Google Scholar
- IEEE Recommended Practice for Seismic Design of Substations (2005), IEEE Standard 693-2005, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar
- Murota N, Feng MQ and Liu GY (2005), “Experimental and Analytical Studies of Base Isolation Systems for Seismic Protection of Power Transformers,” Report No. MCEER-05-0008, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of California, Irvine, CA.Google Scholar
- Ueta G, Kaneko S and Okabe S (2008), “Evaluation of Breakdown Characteristics of Gas Insulated Switchgears for Non-standard Lightning Impulse Waveforms— Breakdown Characteristics Under Non-uniform Electric Field,” IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 15(2): 407–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang XS, Dai ZB, Cao MG and Lu ZC (2013), “Dynamic Behavior of 500 kV Metal Oxide Arresters with a New Type of Lead Dampers,” Journal of Chongqing University, 36(7): 66–73. (in Chinese)Google Scholar