Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid seismic analysis methodology for in-service wind turbine towers

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The wind energy industry has been growing rapidly during the past decades. Along with this growth, engineering problems have gradually emerged in the wind power industry, including those related to the structural reliability of turbine towers. This study proposes a rapid seismic analysis methodology for existing wind turbine tower structures. The method is demonstrated and validated using a case study on a 1.5 MW tubular steel wind turbine tower. Three finite element (FE) models are developed first. Field tests are conducted to obtain the turbine tower's vibrational characteristics. The tests include (1) remotely measuring the tower vibration frequencies using a long range laser Doppler Vibrometer and (2) monitoring the tower structural vibration by mounting accelerometers along the height of the tubular structure. In-situ measurements are used to validate and update the FE models of the wind turbine tower. With the updated FE model that represents the practical structural conditions, seismic analyses are performed to study the structural failure, which is defined by the steel yielding of the tubular tower. This research is anticipated to benefit the management of the increasing number of wind energy converters by providing an understanding of the seismic assessment of existing tubular steel wind turbine towers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANSYS (2012), Release 14.5 Documentation for ANSYS®, Computer Software, ANSYS, Inc.

  • ASCE/AWEA (2011), Recommended Practice for Compliance of Large Land-based Wind Turbine Support Structures, American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) and American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Washington and Virginia, US.

  • Bazeos N, Hatzigeorgiou GD, Hondros ID, Karamaneas H, Karabalis DL and Beskos DE (2002), “Static, Seismic, and Stability Analyzes of a Prototype Wind Turbine Steel Tower,” Engineering Structures, 24(8): 1015–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2005), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Eurocode 8, EN 1998, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.

  • Chen Yong, Zhao Fengxin, Hu Yuxian, You Hongbin, and Zhang Yushan (2010), “Transfer Relationship among Response Spectra with Different Damping Ratios,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 30(4): 17–23. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou JS and Tu WT (2011), “Failure Analysis and Risk Management of a Collapsed Large Wind Turbine Tower,” Engineering Failure Analysis, 18(1): 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSDB (2010), Code for Seismic Design of Buildings, National Standard of People’s Republic of China (GB50011-2010), China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China.

  • CSDBS (2013), Code for Seismic Design of Buildings, Standard of Shanghai (DGJ08-9-2013), Shanghai Urban Construction and Communications Commission, Shanghai, China.

  • Dai KS, Boyajian D, Liu W, Chen S, Scott J, and Schmieder J (2013), “Laser-based Field Measurement for a Bridge Finite Element Model Validation,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai Kaoshan, Gong Changqing, Huang Yichao, and Ren Xiaosong (2013), “Response Spectra for Seismic Design of Low Damped Wind Turbine Towers,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 33(6): 128–134. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • GL (2003), Guidelines for the Certification of Wind Turbines, Hamburg, Germany: GL (Germanischer Llord).

  • Hansen MH, Thomsen K, and Fuglsang P (2006), “Two Methods for Estimating Aeroelastic Damping of Operational Wind Turbine Modes From Experiments,” Wind Energy, 9(1–2): 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He G and Li J (2008), “Seismic Analysis of Wind Turbine System Including Soil-structure Interaction,” Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICC (2012), International Building Code (IBC), International Code Council, Washington, DC, US. IEC (2005), Wind turbines–Part 1: Design Requirements. 3rd ed. Standard IEC 61400-1:2005-08, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Ishihara T, Takamoto G and Sarwar MW (2011), “Seismic Load Evaluation of Wind Turbine Support Structures with Consideration of Uncertainty in Response Spectrum and Higher Modes,” Proceedings of the EWEA Offshore 2011, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, http://windeng.t.utokyo. ac.jp/ishihara/proceedings/2011-4_paper.pdf(accessed April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara T, Yamaguchi A, Takahara K, Mekaru T, and Matsuura S (2005), “An Analysis of Damaged Wind Turbines by Typhoon Maemi in 2003,” Proceedings of the Sixth Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, Seoul, Korea, 1413–1428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaishi R and Ren WX (2005), “Structural Finite Element Model Updating Using Ambient Vibration Test Results,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(4): 617–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavassas I, Nikolaidis G, Zervas P, Efthimiou E, Doudoumis IN, and Baniotopoulos CC (2003), “Analysis and Design of the Prototype of a Steel 1-MW Wind Turbine Tower,” Engineering Structures, 25: 1097–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthew SA, Michael WS, Shashank C and Morten HH (2011), “Output-only Modal Analysis of Linear Timeperiodic Systems with Application to Wind Turbine Simulation Data,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 25: 1174–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miroslav P, Michal B and Tomáš H (2012), “Modal Assurance Criterion,” Procedia Engineering, 48: 543–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty P, Rixen DJ (2006), “Modified ERA Method for Operational Modal Analysis in the Presence of Harmonic Excitations,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20: 114–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nian Yankai, Li Guangjie, Tan Zhoudi and Liu Changsen (1997), “Construction of the Attenuation Relation of Ground Motion in Shanghai and Its Application in Predicting Earthquake Intensity,” Journal of Changchun University of Earth Sciences, 27(3): 317–322. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuta E, Christopoulos C and Packer JA (2011), “Methodology for Seismic Risk Assessment for Tubular Steel Wind Turbine Towers: Application to Canadian Seismic Environment,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 38(3): 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozbek M, Meng F and Rixen DJ (2013), “Challenges in Testing and Monitoring the In-operation Vibration Characteristics of Wind Turbines,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 41: 649–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozbek M and Rixen DJ (2013), “Operational Modal Analysis of a 2.5 MW Wind Turbine Using Optical Measurement Techniques and Strain Gauges,” Wind Energy, 16(3): 367–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozbek M, Rixen DJ, Erne O and Sanow G (2010), “Feasibility of Monitoring Large Wind Turbines Using Photogrammetry,” Energy, 35(12): 4802–4811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieraccini M, Parrini F, Fratini M and Atzeni Cand Spinelli P (2008), “In-service Testing of Wind Turbine Towers Using a Microwave Sensor,” Renewable Energy, 33: 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polytec (2013), RSV-150 Remote Sensing Vibrometer, Waldbronn, Germany, http://www.polytec.com/ us/products/vibration-sensors/special-applicationvibrometers/ rsv-150-remote-sensing-vibrometer/(Accessed, April 2013).

  • Prowell I (2011), “An Experimental and Numerical Study of Wind Turbine Seismic Behavior,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prowell I, Elgamal A, Lu J and Luco JE (2009b), “Modal Properties of a Modern Wind Turbine Including SSI,” Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Alexandria, Egypt, 1989–1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prowell I, Elgamal A, Uang CM, Luco JE, Romanowitz H and Duggan E (2014), “Shake Table Testing and Numerical Simulation of a Utility-scale Wind Turbine Including Operational Effects,” Wind Energy, 17(7): 997–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prowell I, Uang CM, Elgamal A, Luco JE and Guo L (2012), “Shake Table Testing of a Utility-scale Wind Turbine,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 138(7): 900–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prowell I, Veletzos M, Elamal A and Restrepo J (2009a), “Experimental and Numerical Seismic Response of a 65 kW Wind Turbine,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 13(8): 1172–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynders E (2012), “System Identification Methods for (Operational) Modal Analysis: Review and Comparison,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 19(1): 51–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaeian S, Bozorgnia Y, Idriss IM, Campbell K, Abrahamson N and Silva W (2012), “Spectral Damping Scaling Factors for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes in Active Tectonic Regions,” Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) Report, Berkeley, California, US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risf W (2001), Guidelines for Design of Wind Turbines, Wind Energy Department of Risf National Laboratory and Det Norske Veritas, Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumsey M, Hurtado J, Hansche B, Simmermacher T, Carne T and Gross E (1998), “In-filed Use of Laser Doppler Vibrometer on Wind Turbine Blade,” Technical Report SAND97-2745c, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smarsly K, Hartmann D and Law KH (2013), “A Computational Framework for Life-cycle Management of Wind Turbines Incorporating Structural Health Monitoring,” Structural Health Monitoring, 12(4): 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamatopoulos GN (2013), “Response of a Wind Turbine Subjected to Near-fault Excitation and Comparison with the Greek Aseismic Code Provisions,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 46: 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S and Allen MS (2012), “Output-only Modal Analysis Using Continuous-scan Laser Doppler Vibrometry and Application to a 20 kW Wind Turbine,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 31: 228–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S and Allen MS (2014), “Lifting Approach to Simplify Output-only Continuous-scan Laser Vibrometry,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 45(2): 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Tcherniak D, and Allen MS (2014), “Modal Analysis of Rotating Wind Turbine Using Multiblade Coordinate Transformation and Harmonic Power Spectrum,” Topics in Modal Analysis I, Volume 7, Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, 2014: 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaoshan Dai.

Additional information

Supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51208382, Shanghai Science Foundation under Grant No. 12ZR1433500, Shanghai Pujiang Scholar Program under Grant No. 13PJ1407900, Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education under Grant No. 20120072120001, State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment & System Security and New Technology under Grant No. 2007DA10512711414, State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering under Grant No. SLDRCE14-B-02, and Tongji University Testing Facility Funding under Grant No. 2012096

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dai, K., Huang, Y., Gong, C. et al. Rapid seismic analysis methodology for in-service wind turbine towers. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 14, 539–548 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0043-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0043-0

Keywords

Navigation